Game Thread: TIG XCII - Disaster by the Lake

[Pitchwife]

Originally Posted by Nogrod

Okay. I hate doing this but as you seem to be so willing to speak about it in every other post Pitchie, then let me rephrase what I said yesterDay.
But I must say I don't understand why - if you really think yourself like you say you think - so why do you bring this up time and time after time? Even trying to exhaust all possible scenarios one might take! (Well, happily you missed mine) So like I said yesterDay: I wasn't first to speculate on Gal and I hope the wolves have now harder time to guess and second-guess what I know or guess or don't know and what should they think about it.

Of course I think like I say, and I've brought it up time and again because, like you said yourself, "it's already been voiced over".
But actually, I've got to admit I'd skimmed over/neglected/forgotten Agan's teasing "night-scheming" comment to G55 until she just reminded me of it herself, so I was under the impression you had actually been the first to speculate about it. I now get what you seid to me yesterDay, so please disregard my #87 to you. My bad.

[quote=Nogrod;664653]And that's the end of this conversation on my part.[quote]
And mine.

[Pitchwife]

Originally Posted by Shasta

#79 - Agan dismisses outright Lottie's theory about Bom under her own theory that the risk of being dreamed is too great. Seems a bit silly to me - finding the cobbler is a nice bonus for the Seer, but not the main priority.

Can the Seer even see the cobbler? Admin thread just says

The raven then reports back to the Seer on that villager's role.

so that looks like yes, but usually they can't. Boro?
(This is just a minor point, though.)

Originally Posted by Shasta

Mentions Pitch is erroneous in saying "there was a wolf involved in the early talk". I agree here, but not to the extent that it makes Pitch looks suspicious like Agan thinks.
[...]
#58 - Defends Nog pretty passionately here, against Greenie (and this is in response to Inzil.) Puts more pressure on Pitch (and this looks somewhat like the beginning of a witchhunt.)

I appreciate the defense, but this is not how I read her. She was just questioning me on a statement I had made and made me explain it, which I think is normal procedure in WW. I've seen Agan witchhunting, and this isn't what it looks like (as you should actually know, if I'm not mistaken).
But Agan, how did Nog turn from someone you trusted enough to save his life yesterDay to a baddie you could imagine voting for toDay?

[Aganzir]

Originally Posted by Nogrod

Okay. Galadriel says I'm "plain illogical" and Agan says I'm "surprisingly illogical".

I didn't say you were illogical now, and I probably couldn't give you any examples off the top of my head. The illogicality I mean is more of the kind of looking at the world through strongly wolf-coloured glasses with a la-la-la-not-listening attitude which you tend to have at times.

I wasn't first to speculate on Gal and I hope the wolves have now harder time to guess and second-guess what I know or guess or don't know and what should they think about it.

Yes you were. My remark about it was about as relevant as, well, any of the first posts.

Originally Posted by A Little Green

You do annoy me, dear. I'm just trying very hard not to let that affect my opinion of your alignment. Actually, that's part of why I'm so undecided about you at the moment.

I always try that too but it never works, and laugh at me all you like, it worries me that you're not suspecting me. Last time I remember you doing this, you were a wolf and I wasn't.

Ahh now Shasta makes me feel special! Good thing he made the summary, otherwise I wouldn't remember what I thought on day 1.

Originally Posted by Shastanis Althreduin

For one, why assume Lottie didn't think of the other possibility and choose not to mention it (like an innocent should)? For another, why draw attention to a possible Gifted!Bom yourself in the first place? It doesn't sit right with me.

Because if I think someone is acting unusually (as opposed to suspiciously), I tend to keep it to myself until I've figured out if they're unusual in a good or a bad way. This means I don't accuse them before that - which Lottie basically did.
And Shasta might be a gifted. It's not even that unlikely, there's a 3/11 chance he's one. There. Am I drawing attention to a possible gifted? If I don't have an in-game reason for thinking someone is one, it can hardly be considered "drawing attention".

It's interesting to note that the only thing Agan has said about me thus far is that I "feel sneaky" and she still "feels bad" about me.

Yeah, I think so too. Usually I need a stronger suspicion to consider voting someone.

Mentions Inzil has already been voted for, but that she's "not sure if it was ever going to turn into a bandwagon" which is a comment I don't understand.

I believe it had to do with him being seemingly so concerned about saving his skin. He had been talked about but I wasn't sure if it was enough to earn him lots of votes yet, like he seemed to think.

Again, looks like a prelude to a wolf hunt - Agan looks like she's waiting to pounce on whatever answer Lottie gives, no matter what it is.

It was intended to be a prelude to a wolf hunt. If Shasta is a wolf, I suggest lynching Lottie next.

I'm thinking of leaving apple cores in her bed for this.

You think I'd take you into my bed so soon after Kath's death??

#94 - Votes Inzil (a far cry from a) where her suspicions were and b) who she said she'd vote.)

Actually one of my vote counts has my name missing from the Left to vote list. That's because I had typed plus plus Shasta but then counted the votes again and figured it would be a complete throwaway and besides, it would be very unlike me to wash my hands from the lynch.

Now Lommy and Legate wandered into my room and asked if I'd still like to do something fun with them before going to bed and I said yes, so I'll be back a bit later.