Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
View Poll Results: Which book should be the subject of the next CbC discussion? | |||
The Hobbit | 35 | 60.34% | |
The Silmarillion | 23 | 39.66% | |
Voters: 58. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-15-2005, 02:59 AM | #1 |
A Shade of Westernesse
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The last wave over Atalantë
Posts: 515
|
CbC: Silm or TH?
With the Lord of the Rings Chapter-by-Chapter Discussion being such a hit, there has emerged discussion of the possibility of another CbC some time after this one is wrapped up. This poll is to get a read on which other work of Tolkien's BDers would be most interested in discussing chapter-by-chapter. The two logical choices seem to be The Hobbit and The Silmarillion. I am assuming that HoME, UT, the Letters, etc. should be excluded from this poll, though doubtless there are some of us who would love to disect them page-by-page, letter-by-letter.
So what do you think? Bilbo or Beren? The two pieces are obviously dissimilar, and there are those who feel that neither is to be taken as wholly canonical. Regardless of their merit as pieces of the Legendarium, they both make for a sterling read. I would not be unhappy with either, and I suspect that the majority of Downers feels the same way. The Silmarillion, however, gets my vote: it has always been my favorite of Tolkien's works, edging out LotR on account of its grand scope and that indescribable hint of the mythic, of old dusty lorebooks and legends washed away by the Sea. (Sorry to wax faux poetic.) This is by no means the official poll to determine which work we read next, unless the moderators deem it to be. You need not substantiate your vote with a lengthy argument (though we all know prolix debate is welcomed here at the Downs if you wish to engage in it). Just choose whichever work you would have more fun reading and discussing. I will note that if The Silmarillion is chosen, I would be happy to take over Esty's role as discussion leader -- assuming she wishes to relinquish that power. Apologies if this thread was posted in the wrong place, or if it should not exist at all.
__________________
"This miserable drizzling afternoon I have been reading up old military lecture-notes again:- and getting bored with them after an hour and a half. I have done some touches to my nonsense fairy language - to its improvement." |
09-15-2005, 03:11 AM | #2 |
Princess of Skwerlz
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: where the Sea is eastwards (WtR: 6060 miles)
Posts: 7,500
|
Turning over a new leaf!
I voted for The Hobbit because of the experience I made with the LotR discussion. Very few members have continued discussing the chapters by now, so that I think a shorter work would have a better chance of getting widespread and hopefully lasting participation. I also think TH would get a bigger audience, as younger members might be more inclined to post there than on a book about which they don't feel as knowledgeable.
The whole idea is to get as many people as possible involved, and I think that could more likely be achieved with a discussion of The Hobbit.
__________________
'Mercy!' cried Gandalf. 'If the giving of information is to be the cure of your inquisitiveness, I shall spend all the rest of my days in answering you. What more do you want to know?' 'The whole history of Middle-earth...' Last edited by Estelyn Telcontar; 09-15-2005 at 03:17 AM. |
09-15-2005, 03:18 AM | #3 |
A Mere Boggart
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: under the bed
Posts: 4,737
|
I'll vote for The Hobbit, for all the reasons Esty has mentioned! But also because I think it is time we gave some serious thought to the book - and that can include where it does and does not 'fit' into the Legendarium.
I've discovered a lot more about LotR through these CbC discussions, they have added depth to my reading, and I would love to experience that with The Hobbit.
__________________
Gordon's alive!
|
09-15-2005, 03:19 AM | #4 |
Animated Skeleton
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 33
|
I've always loved The Hobbit and would very much like to get in on discussing it.
__________________
Outside a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside a dog, it's too dark to read. -- Groucho Marx Last edited by Koobdooga; 09-15-2005 at 04:06 AM. |
09-15-2005, 03:59 AM | #5 |
Byronic Brand
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: The 1590s
Posts: 2,778
|
I voted for the Silmarillion because I love it more than the rest of Tolkien put together, it has the Sons of Feanor and Maeglin in it, and-most importantly-I have a copy in my room here at school, which is not true of LOTR and the Hobbit...so my comments could actually have a textual basis...
__________________
Among the friendly dead, being bad at games did not seem to matter -Il Lupo Fenriso |
09-15-2005, 07:00 AM | #6 |
Mischievous Candle
|
If it's possible that we'll eventually go through both the Sil and the Hobbit as CbC, I don't care which book we read first. I'd love to learn more about the Sil but I agree with Esty that the Hobbit might gather more participants than the Sil.
__________________
Fenris Wolf
|
09-15-2005, 07:53 AM | #7 |
Wight
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Nwy, land of the llamas
Posts: 109
|
I think that it'd work better to start with the Hobbit, though the Sil will eventually be more useful and interesting to those who have read it. The Hobbit would gather more participants for one thing. I also grew up on the hobbit from when I was starting reading chapter books on my own, so I may be biased towards it, but I feel discussing the hobbit would be better to go first between the two.
Of course I think after this Sil should also be done. |
09-15-2005, 12:27 PM | #8 |
Pilgrim Soul
Join Date: May 2004
Location: watching the wonga-wonga birds circle...
Posts: 9,458
|
While I feel the Silmarillion would appeal more personally, since it is richer, I do think the Hobbit would be a better choice and less liable to get tangled up with HoME. I think there might be a case for at least parts of UT though. But then I love UT.....
__________________
“But Finrod walks with Finarfin his father beneath the trees in Eldamar.”
Christopher Tolkien, Requiescat in pace |
09-15-2005, 12:36 PM | #9 |
Byronic Brand
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: The 1590s
Posts: 2,778
|
I don't suppose both in tandem would be an option?
__________________
Among the friendly dead, being bad at games did not seem to matter -Il Lupo Fenriso |
09-15-2005, 01:48 PM | #10 | |
Bittersweet Symphony
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the jolly starship Enterprise
Posts: 1,814
|
Quote:
|
|
09-15-2005, 03:39 PM | #11 | |
Wight
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Nwy, land of the llamas
Posts: 109
|
Quote:
|
|
09-15-2005, 04:12 PM | #12 |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Umbar, but before the corsairs took over. (Ave Maria University, FL, USA)
Posts: 632
|
I voted for The Hobbit just because it's a much less 'scary' work. To tell the truth, I've been curious about CbC, but frightened by the deep level of though being discussed. The Hobbit is a more accessible work than Silm, which would be very helpful to those like myself who would like toget involved, but are intimidated. Also, as Encai said, it would be much easier to do some worthwhile thinking on The Hobbit than Silm while a good number of us younger members are busy with school.
__________________
Gone for lentSeeyou at Easter! (And on Sundays too, maybe.)
|
09-16-2005, 11:53 AM | #13 |
A Northern Soul
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Valinor
Posts: 1,847
|
Both should be done, but The Hobbit ought to go first.
__________________
...take counsel with thyself, and remember who and what thou art. |
09-16-2005, 12:12 PM | #14 |
Beloved Shadow
|
I'm with Legolas.
__________________
the phantom has posted.
This thread is now important. |
09-16-2005, 12:40 PM | #15 |
Pugnaciously Primordial Paradox
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Birnham Wood
Posts: 800
|
I voted for the Silmarillion. Admittedly, I probably won't have a chance to participate, and I understand too well how bad it is to try and moderate a discussion that isn't happening (in fact I'm having that exact problem with a book group at the moment). I voted on my instincts. The Silmarillion has more to offer. The decision (in my mind) is like deciding between discussing Jack and the Beanstalk and Faust. While Jack has some interesting ethical problems and plot mechanisms, and is so short that it can be easily exhasted (comparatively), Faust has much more depth and participants stand to gain much more from discussion.
THe same goes here. Best wishes to all, Iarwain
__________________
"And what are oaths but words we say to God?" |
09-16-2005, 04:34 PM | #16 | |
Maniacal Mage
|
Hobbits, then sons of feanor
Quote:
__________________
'But Melkor also was there, and he came to the house of Fëanor, and there he slew Finwë King of the Noldor before his doors, and spilled the first blood in the Blessed Realm; for Finwë alone had not fled from the horror of the Dark.' |
|
09-16-2005, 06:21 PM | #17 |
Shadow of the Past
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Minas Mor-go
Posts: 1,007
|
I voted for The Silmarillion, but simply because I'm trying to get my mother to read it at the moment and I think a chapter-by-chapter discussion could motivate her a bit more.
|
09-16-2005, 06:29 PM | #18 |
Energetic Essence
|
I voted for The Hobbit for the reasons previously stated by Esty. Also, I think that if we start with a book wich is really closely related to LotR, more people would be motivated to talk about it. I know that if The Hobbit is chosen, I'll be participatin (if I can) in the CbC thread.
__________________
I'm going to buy you a kitty, I'm going to let you fall in love with the kitty, and one cold, winter night, I'm going to steal into your house and punch you in the face! Fenris Wolf
|
09-18-2005, 05:50 PM | #19 |
Dead Serious
|
The Hobbit
My reasoning is that the Silmarillion is quite possibly the better known work. We have dozens of threads all carefully going over all the little quirks and queries of the book, but The Hobbit seems a little neglected. We tend- or I tend- to think of it as more of a frivoulous read, not one that contains as much lore. But really, it does. There are whole sections of Middle-Earth history that are glimpsed primarily through The Hobbit, and there are many little snipets pertaining to the greater history that are among the few canonical statements about it. And, barring those readers who accept ONLY the Lord of the Rings as canonical, The Hobbit is the only definitive canonical source of any decent size pertaining to Middle-Earth that can be accepted as such close to definitely, except for the Lord of the Rings itself. It is the only other major work by the Professor that was published in his lifetime, according to his specs, that deals with Middle-Earth.
__________________
I prefer history, true or feigned.
|
09-19-2005, 02:35 AM | #20 |
Shady She-Penguin
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In a far land beyond the Sea
Posts: 8,093
|
The Silmarillion
In my opinion we'll get more interesting (?) and more in-depth discussion on Sil.
__________________
Like the stars chase the sun, over the glowing hill I will conquer Blood is running deep, some things never sleep Double Fenris
|
09-19-2005, 09:34 AM | #21 |
Everlasting Whiteness
|
I would agree with Encai and Esty (and others) that we should start with The Hobbit to get people interested and also to avoid scaring them away. I have been haunting the Cbc thread for a long time but have never felt brave enough to post because of the sheer intelligence of the discussion going on in there. To my mind there is less symbolism and fewer hidden messages within The Hobbit and so it might be easier to start with.
__________________
“If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world.” |
09-25-2005, 07:41 PM | #22 |
Pile O'Bones
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 16
|
The Hobbit, fourthing the reasons from Oromin, et. al. I think I could more meaningfully contribute to a Hobbit discussion; it's been some time for both books, but I really had to churn through Silmarillon
Also agree that I'd like to do both eventually, but I think it'd be easier to get used to the sort of analysis that tends to happen in CbC threads with the smaller work. |
09-26-2005, 01:25 AM | #23 |
Alive without breath
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: On A Cold Wind To Valhalla
Posts: 5,912
|
Rats in the Pipe
I've voted for The Hobbit. The Lord of the Rings was a mammoth task, I think we need a little break, to do something a little less daunting. I think that The Silmarilion should be done, but not just yet. I'd wait till a little later. Doing The Hobbit would be a good way for some who gave up (namely me) to get back into the discussions before we go on to something as huge (not in size, but in stature) as The Silmarillion. Save the best till last. What’s next? The History of Middle Earths? The Letters? Farmer Giles and other Tolkien books?
That’s what I think anyway,
__________________
I think that if you want facts, then The Downer Newspaper is probably the place to go. I know! I read it once. THE PHANTOM AND ALIEN: The Legend of the Golden Bus Ticket... |
09-27-2005, 06:24 AM | #24 | |
Shady She-Penguin
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In a far land beyond the Sea
Posts: 8,093
|
Quote:
__________________
Like the stars chase the sun, over the glowing hill I will conquer Blood is running deep, some things never sleep Double Fenris
|
|
09-27-2005, 02:58 PM | #25 |
Fair and Cold
|
I voted for Hobbit. If I can get myself in gear and actually participate this next time around, I think starting off with something that is both a fun and sweet book would really work for me and some others as well.
__________________
~The beginning is the word and the end is silence. And in between are all the stories. This is one of mine~ |
09-28-2005, 04:01 PM | #26 |
Memento Mori
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Past The Point Of No Return
Posts: 1,117
|
I too vote for The Hobbit. I have a particular affection for Bilbo's tale, it's true. But also I hope I'd be able to participate this time around.
I've tried, but found it impossible to keep up with the previous CbC discussion, I didn't have the time to do it justice I'm afraid. The thoughtful and insightful posts made by others have been fascinating reading though...Well done to those who did take part!
__________________
"Remember, hope is a good thing, maybe the best of things. And no good thing ever dies." |
09-29-2005, 06:59 AM | #27 | |
Shady She-Penguin
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In a far land beyond the Sea
Posts: 8,093
|
Quote:
__________________
Like the stars chase the sun, over the glowing hill I will conquer Blood is running deep, some things never sleep Double Fenris
|
|
09-29-2005, 12:31 PM | #28 | |
Dead Serious
|
Quote:
As for the Silmarillion... That's a different question. Some chapters are shorter, but some (if one counts the "Akallabeth" as a chapter) are quite large, if not in pages then in information.
__________________
I prefer history, true or feigned.
|
|
09-29-2005, 02:04 PM | #29 |
Relic of Wandering Days
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: You'll See Perpetual Change.
Posts: 1,480
|
The Silmarillion would be wonderful. And though I do think that it would be harder to keep up with, I think the rewards would be tremendous! But should we even be thinking of CbC discussions in terms of time. Can't they always be an ongoing thing, with one adding to the thread with every rereading?
|
10-02-2005, 03:34 PM | #30 |
Shade of Carn Dûm
|
I voted TH. I think that, while there is less "meat" there, it will be easier to get into for those of us who don't feel particularly confident with our degree of knowledge on the Sil.
A slower pace would be great, too. I have a very busy schedule and therefore don't really have the time to participate meaningfully in the CbC on LOTR. I wish I did, but I just don't have enough time to read every thread before posting. Sil might be interesting, though. I'm sure I'd learn a lot through discussing it. Either one we pick is pretty much fine with me, and now I'm wondering why I didn't want to go out for the challenge of discussing Sil...
__________________
"Wherever I have been, I am back." |
10-19-2005, 08:13 AM | #31 |
Wight
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: here, there, everywhere...
Posts: 121
|
The Hobbit for me
__________________
Reading this sig costs three Galleons, nine Sickles, and a Knut. Pay up! |
10-20-2005, 06:02 PM | #32 |
Wight
|
The Hobbit (ooohhh I have been away too long, now you have pretty green leaves!)
Although I think discussion would be more in-depth with The Sil; I have to say The Hobbit. Because it is so different from everything else it is certainly the most confusing of Tolkien's works for me. I'm never quite sure what to take seriously: all of it or not? I think that hearing other Downer's views would help me a great deal with deciding what to think about The Hobbit in general too... I've never really been 'into it' as I have LotR and The Sil and such like.
__________________
Ú cilith ‘war. Ú men ‘war. Boe min mebi. Boe min bango. |
11-02-2005, 03:35 AM | #33 |
Wight
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tottering about in the Wild
Posts: 130
|
Much as I love The Silm , if the idea is to engage more Downers in the discussion, I think The Hobbit is a 'friendlier' choice. It saddened me to think that some people were shy of posting on the LOTR CbC discussion because they thought they wouldn't sound intelligent enough. While well-thought-out posts should always be encouraged, everyone should feel free to comment within the guidelines of civilized discussion, even if it's their first reading of a book. New eyes can give us old-timers interesting perspectives on our favorite books & chapters.
Bother, I've gone off on a rant...but I think I'll leave it.
__________________
Not all those who wander are lost . . . because some of us know how to read a map. |
11-11-2005, 01:36 PM | #34 |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The Party Tree
Posts: 1,042
|
While I have no doubts that certain Down's members will still attain the highest levels of lengthy and annalytical posts equipped with well documented quotes for their debates (look what they did to a simple game of 'werewolf'! ), I have voted for The Hobbit because I myself would be able to dip a toe in the discussions.
__________________
Holby is an actual flesh-and-blood person, right? Not, say a sock-puppet of Nilp’s, by any chance? ~Nerwen, WWCIII |
11-13-2005, 02:44 PM | #35 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi
Well... I prefer The Hobbit, I think that is because is the first book I ever read... Anyway, The Silmarillion can be kind of 'thick' in some parts for me, specially in the beginning when it tells how Iluvatar created the Valars, etc, etc... The sotry of The Hobbit is such a classical story of fantasy but wiht a lot of little things that give flavour to the tale, I don't know if you can follow my "primitive" english... Whatever, my votes goes rightly to The Hobbit. |
11-13-2005, 04:10 PM | #36 |
Illustrious Ulair
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In the home of lost causes, and forsaken beliefs, and unpopular names,and impossible loyalties
Posts: 4,240
|
I wonder how deep an analysis of TH can go. Unlike LotR, TH was written as a straightforward entertainment for Tolkien's children. No-one has a greater love for TH than I do, but to be honest I think I'd struggle to come up with more than either an 'I really like the bit where...', or an exploration of Tolkien's sources/influences - which is just 'breaking a thing to find out what it is made of'.
All those wanting to go on to TH: have you thought of the kind of things you want to discuss? There are some books/movies that we love to bits because of the spell they weave on us, but, beyond the way they make us feel there's little to talk about. In short, I think there's much more mileage in 'Ainulindale' than in 'An Unexpected Party' (though personally I'd rather read the latter if its simply a matter of enjoyment). |
11-13-2005, 07:05 PM | #37 | |
Dead Serious
|
Quote:
After all, we have had a great deal of that in the LotR CbC. Perhaps a temporary change of pace to a more lighthearted "What I like here"/"What I don't like here" sort of discussion would be good for us. Furthermore, if the rousing number of posts on Master Fordhim's new "Calling All Women" thread is any indication, I think you can expect more deep discussion from The Hobbi than you think. Personally, although I agree that The Hobbit is a more child-oriented and simpler book than either the Lord of the Rings or the Silmarillion, it still has more to offer than you are suggesting. Furthermore, although some people (I am recalling Mithalwen) on the other thread have basically said that there is nothing new in The Hobbit for them, I rather disagree. By getting the perspectives of a whole number of people, you are bound to get some new thoughts, and opinions unthought of. I stick by my original vote for The Hobbit.
__________________
I prefer history, true or feigned.
|
|
11-16-2005, 04:29 AM | #38 |
Hauntress of the Havens
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: IN it, but not OF it
Posts: 2,538
|
I have to read The Hobbit again. Maybe this time I'll finally appreciate it, as my love for LotR grew by leaps and bounds thanks to CbC.
Besides, I think a CbC of The Silm would be bloody. And it would probably be inevitable to include a lot of HoME, and that could turn some off from the discussion... |
11-16-2005, 08:02 AM | #39 | |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lurking in the shadows.
Posts: 711
|
Quote:
I'd vote the Hobbit, anyway, but that's mostly because the Silmarillion seems far too scary. |
|
01-11-2006, 07:17 AM | #40 |
Princess of Skwerlz
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: where the Sea is eastwards (WtR: 6060 miles)
Posts: 7,500
|
The majority voted for The Hobbit; as that's what I was planning to do any way it is the next book we'll be discussing chapter-by-chapter. We begin this coming weekend - I hope all those of you who voted and many more will join in!
__________________
'Mercy!' cried Gandalf. 'If the giving of information is to be the cure of your inquisitiveness, I shall spend all the rest of my days in answering you. What more do you want to know?' 'The whole history of Middle-earth...' |
|
|