Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
04-15-2005, 05:36 PM | #1 |
Shade of Carn Dűm
|
The Doom of Eucatastrophe
A single thought occurred to me, and as my original thoughts tend to be already in play I will happily concede to the closing of this thread if the topic is already used.
To bring us to the theme of my thread, I ask the question: Does Tolkien's idea of Eucatastrophe lead to the undeniable destruction of the story itself? Does a good, all-engrossing story create its own demise? To explain, in LoTR the plot centers around the quest for the destruction of the ring. Trials and obstruction occur, but are overcome. When the ring is destroyed, the entire plot vanishes. To continue the story would only prolong the inevitable end, and the introduction of another large plot-twisting dilemna would seem too obvious, too soap-opera-ish. So, the question is, can their be a story that is enjoyable, wonderful, eucatastrophic, and yet not lead to a foreseeable end? b_b
__________________
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow, and with more knowledge comes more grief." |
04-15-2005, 09:02 PM | #2 | |
Bittersweet Symphony
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the jolly starship Enterprise
Posts: 1,814
|
Quotage that seems appropriate.
The tale of the Ring's existence is over when it is destroyed, but the plot is not over. Its effects are still evident and the aftermath of the main plot remains to be told.
Quote:
|
|
04-15-2005, 10:42 PM | #3 |
Itinerant Songster
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Edge of Faerie
Posts: 7,066
|
A fascinating, and dire, question, bilbo_baggins; and the answer you provided, Encaitare, is the same that occurred to me.
However, b_b alludes to something I think we all feel upon reaching the conclusion of the entire story of LotR: a bittersweet sense of something very satisfying having been enjoyed, married to a regret that it's over. It's why we go back and read it over and over again (I'm due), watch the movies, read the Letters, pour over the Appendices, study HoME, and spend inordinate amounts of time here! We don't want the story to end, but it does. So how come the quote Encaitare provided, fails to completely satisfy (at least me)? I think Tolkien provides a clue by saying that LotR is about death. It's a story about endings. Great things are drawing to a conclusion and merely mundane things are taking their place; the First Age of gods and Elves (and some noble Men) and Morgoth the Great is followed by the Second Age of Numenorean Half Men/Half Elves, a shrunken Middle Earth (Beleriand is lost), and Sauron. Which is followed by the Third Age with its waning of the Elves, and then the Fourth Age in which Elves and hobbits diminish and the mundane world of Men takes over. Myth gives way to legend, gives way to folklore, gives way to history, gives way to yesterday's news. There. I've gone and depressed myself, and you too no doubt. Time to read a few more Letters of Tolkien, and A Long Expected Party..... |
04-16-2005, 06:11 AM | #4 | ||
Illustrious Ulair
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In the home of lost causes, and forsaken beliefs, and unpopular names,and impossible loyalties
Posts: 4,240
|
Quote:
- I posted this quote from an essay in Tolkien the Medievalist by Christine Chism: Middle earth, the Middle Ages, & the Aryan Nation: Myth & History in WWII. Quote:
|
||
04-16-2005, 07:11 AM | #5 | |
Shade of Carn Dűm
|
Quote:
So, if it seems that Tolkien's intent was to write a melancholy story, about the "end of all things" (frodo to sam), and to portray "a red day, a sword day, ere the sun sets!" then he did quite what he set out to do. Doesn't his purpose reflect in the Silm, where the quests and actions of the Elves are met with disaster and death, unleashing terrible sorrow? Perhaps Tolkien suffered from depression.... b_b
__________________
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow, and with more knowledge comes more grief." |
|
04-16-2005, 07:51 AM | #6 | |
Itinerant Songster
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Edge of Faerie
Posts: 7,066
|
Quote:
|
|
04-16-2005, 08:30 AM | #7 | |
A Mere Boggart
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: under the bed
Posts: 4,737
|
Quote:
Tolkien realised that this had to be the end of the stories from Middle Earth - he tried to write of the fourth age but found that he could not produce anything remotely as satisfying. In fact, the experience of trying seems to have disheartened him more than a little. When I read what he had tried to write, I too felt a little depressed. It drew a line under any notions I might have had about more stories from the fourth age; I realised that LotR really had been the ultimate story as far as Middle Earth was concerned. It made me think, what is better? More Tolkien or the best Tolkien could offer?
__________________
Gordon's alive!
|
|
04-16-2005, 11:51 AM | #8 | |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
|
Quote:
But the thing about publishing dozens of books, all in the same series, seems to me to draw it out unnecessarily and by the time we get to book five or six, we're wondering why the author won't just make an end already. (I think there's only one series where I haven't wondered that, and that's George R. R. Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire.) Things like Robert Jordan's Wheel of Time and Terry Goodkind's Sword of Truth serieses are all very well and good, but you have to wonder; would they be better if the authors had spent all the time that Tolkien did on LotR... I have to say that 'the best Tolkien could offer' is a great deal better than it would be if he had lived now and succumbed to the pressure of printing book after book after book that only stretched out the story and didn't enrich it. Endings are good. (And that was awfully garbled and rambly. Your pardons all.) |
|
04-16-2005, 02:22 PM | #9 | ||
Bittersweet Symphony
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: On the jolly starship Enterprise
Posts: 1,814
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|