book vs movie - The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum

07-26-2002, 06:21 PM

the book was better

The Fifth · 07-26-2002, 06:30 PM

The movie was v. great visually and musically, but they butchered the story somewhat. The book was great too, and allowed you to use your imagination. Plus nothing was cut out or added on to it because it was the original.

I like both the book and the movie equally.

Demloth of Dol Amroth · 07-26-2002, 09:41 PM

i tend to agree with The Fifth(though it's never wise to upset a ringwraith-i've heard they've nasty tempers...)

NyteSky · 07-26-2002, 10:18 PM

No. I'm with nenohantar. No matter how good I don't think movies can ever compare to the books they're based on. Especially not LotR. There's simply too much in the books. The movie loses too much in translation. Tho they did an incredible job wi it. The only things that the movie did have that could've used some improvement was the casting of Elrond (sorry, good actor, but he doesn't look like an elf!) and Galadriel. But that's just a personnal opinion anyhow. Fortunately we now have both! Now they just need to come out wi the next 2 movies...

Shadow of Udûn · 07-26-2002, 11:25 PM

They're so different that you can't compare them.I mean, a movie, even a three hour one, is meant to be short, enjoyed in one blast, and then over. A book is meant to be enjoyed slower. It's not that the books are better, just that they're completely different. I would always enjoy the books more.

Anorien · 07-26-2002, 11:44 PM

Well, that was subtle, nenohantar. And completely agree with you. The movies, while they are great image to give color to the words Tolkien already wrote, they do not compare to them. i mean, PJ did a wonderful job, and i give him full marks, but the books are truly the best. i remember the first time I read them, it was sooo awesome, and full of life. I can't wait for TTT to come out, so that i can put pictures to the book, just cause i like to, lol.

Legolas · 07-26-2002, 11:55 PM

I think the main reason that there is so much conflict and satisfaction in some minds between the movie and book is because this is Tolkien. Tolkien was always so descriptive of the scenery that he comes much closer to playing a movie for the reader (than other authors)...it's just that the movie isn't long enough to include all he written.

In that sense, the books could be easily translated to a movie because it's a script in itself. The books don't leave so much for personal interpretation (mainly visualization that I'm speaking of) like so many others do, therefore when put to film, any alteration will immediately be frowned upon.

The leaving out of parts the author wrote (Old Man Willow, Bombadil, Barrow-Downs) bothers me but is more acceptable than altering what he wrote, modifying it to fit popular culture.

I could've hurled when I saw Arwen in the place of Glorfindel.

*holds stomach*

Someone said she'd also be at Helm's Deep; is this true?

*blows chunks*

I prefer the books, though I do still like the movies. Something about seeing certain moments make it all too real, like the Argonath, for instance. The book, too, has these moments though, and they seem to be more plentiful. Perhaps because I read them first.

In any event, I recommend you do the same, even if you saw The Fellowship of the Ring in theatres first.

[ July 27, 2002: Message edited by: Legalos ]

Arwen Undómiel · 07-28-2002, 07:27 AM

Of Course the book is better!! But is always nice to see what you read in film [img]smilies/biggrin.gif[/img]

maleliel · 07-30-2002, 02:17 PM

I've heard Arwen is at Helms Deep too. Apparently (I'm not sure so don't quote me on this!) her and Elrond flee Rivendell to Lothlorien. Then Arwen leads a band of Elves to Helms Deep to help and all the Elves die except her! Now, I don't know about the rest of you but that just seems wrong! Wrong because Elrond would never flee Rivendell and wrong because the Elves (save Legolas, Elrohir, Elladan e.t.c.) are not meant to be involved in the War of the Ring! Tell me if I'm wrong though! [img]smilies/rolleyes.gif[/img]
Anyway, just thought you'd like to know! [img]smilies/smile.gif[/img]
I answer to the actual question, I'd agree that you can't really compare the books and the movies. They are both good in their own ways. [img]smilies/smile.gif[/img]

Gorothlammothiel · 07-30-2002, 02:33 PM

I believe that the books and the movies can be compared, but that the answer depends on the person. I also believe that to make a judgement on the movies having seen only one and comparing that one to the three (or possibly more) books that we have would be unfair.

Personally I think that the books are always superior to a Movie made of them, unless the book came after the movie and was a story based on the film. I think it is to do with originallity. When you read words you paint a picture in your head of all the characters and places, but when you see a film you see pictures of others imaginations and this can lead to disappointment. That disappointment however is not down to anyone involved in making the film, as i'm sure that if I were to make a film, my interpretations of the text would be very different to most others who would want to see it.

mystra · 07-30-2002, 02:44 PM

the movie was good. i understood it better.

gollum*elf*pup · 07-30-2002, 02:55 PM

ya, the movie was kind of eaiser to understand, but you know, movies cant be really confusing or no one will watch them! except crazy ppl like me)
the book was an amazing book, and the movie was an amazing movie. [img]smilies/smile.gif[/img]

Eruwen · 07-30-2002, 02:59 PM

I loved the book. It was sooo good. And for about 6 months I thought the book was better. Until now. I don't know why, but my opinion has somewhat changed.

I mean, yeah. The movie can NEVER even remotely campare to the great wonders of the book. But, personally, I hate reading. It was these books that got me actually reading again. But I think I like watching the story on a tv or theater screen better than seeing it in my head. {If you understand that.}

Anway, my point is, sometimes my imagination doesn't give the book as much credit as it deserves while I'm picturing it in my head. That's why I like watching the movie. Cause it's like I'm seeing Tolkien's imagination come to life and not my own. He can picture it way better than I can. And that is why I like to "watch" the story instead of read it.

Ok. I have talked way too long. If anyone understands what I have said, then you are very smart. Cause I don't think I made a bit of sense. Anyway, I'm done now.

mystra · 07-30-2002, 03:00 PM

im gonna be honest.

the book was crap.

gollum*elf*pup · 07-30-2002, 03:07 PM

Quote:

the book was crap

[img]smilies/eek.gif[/img] [img]smilies/eek.gif[/img] [img]smilies/eek.gif[/img] are you serious?

mystra · 07-30-2002, 03:08 PM

yup.

gollum*elf*pup · 07-30-2002, 03:10 PM

[img]smilies/eek.gif[/img] you crazy

mystra · 07-30-2002, 03:18 PM

i dont like things i cant understand

Brionna · 07-30-2002, 03:18 PM

I think SOMEONE is just trying to get "Tolkienites" all riled up.

As for me, of course, of course the book is better than the movie. Can anyone think of an instance when this wasn't true? I think that the movie was very accurate in capturing the spirit of the book.

Visually stunning, elegant and powerful- good times! The only real issue I took with the movie was the beefing up of Arwen's part. But then, every Hollywood movie needs a little romance, and if LOTR lacks in any area, it would be there.

mystra · 07-30-2002, 03:22 PM

no im not. and my name is mystra, not someone. and if rimbaud is here, im sorry i lost my temper, and how long am i banned for?

*bursts into tears and grovels

Susan Delgado · 07-30-2002, 07:39 PM

Quote:

of course the book is better than the movie. Can anyone think of an instance when this wasn't true?

Yes. Forrest Gump. I liked the movie, but the book was terrible.

Tell us why you didn't like it, mystra. Flat saying it's bad doesn't tell us anything.

mystra · 07-31-2002, 08:40 AM

i said why i didnt like it.

i didnt understand it.

Amanaduial the archer · 07-31-2002, 10:26 AM

oooh ouch stephanos!

well i luv the movie (not slightly becos one of the actors if fine...elwood elwood elwood...) but there is the obvious thing in the movie that u all seem to have somehow overlooked-

The barrowdowns was completely left out of the movie!

ps. Stephanos- where did u get ure pic or is it someone u know?
pps. how did u get to be a moderator so soon?

[ July 31, 2002: Message edited by: Amanaduial the archer ]

Davin · 08-01-2002, 10:49 PM

I saw FotR in the theatres before I started reading the books, and I having seen FotR before reading it, I didn't enjoy it as much as when I read TTT and RotK. However, i can't sit down and read an entire LotR book in 3 hours, so I think the movies are good for a solid blast of Middle-earth when ever I feel the need for it.

Shadow of Udûn · 08-02-2002, 01:06 AM

That thing about Arwen fleeing Rivendell for helm's deep must be wrong. I know that she's in the next movie, despite not being in the book, but wouldn't PJ get lynched if he tried that? I mean, enough people got angry when he replaced glorfindel with her (which i reckon was good, anyway) but he wouldn't make her like some kind of general. At least I hope he doesn't. It would ruin that bit for me if he did.

08-02-2002, 02:49 AM

Shadow of Udûn suggested that you cannot compare the two, Gorothlammothiel suggested that you can. This is a classic example of arguing the wrong point. People these days are too involved in seeing whether or not they can, they do not stop to think whether they should. A valid, fair, and comprehensive comparison of the two works may well be possible, but why even attempt it? What would be gained from the analysis?

Surely the two deserve to be judge on their own merit? Considering the time Tolkien put into LotR it should be judge as an individual’s unique work; conversely, considering the thousands of people involved in the creation of the LotR film (the actors, film crew, make-up artists, musicians, designers) it should be judged as a unique group effort. In my view a comparison of the two is moot.

I agree that you can judge the film on its reflection of the book, Tolkien did this himself with the Ralf Bakshi film (and was rather scathing). This is not a comparison, rather a critique. What Tolkien did was give his (authoritive) opinion on where the film failed in its portrayal of his book, he did not do this in order to announce that “it wasn’t as good as the book”, he was simply judging the film on its own (poor) merits.

Mystra makes a perfectly valid point, she(?) just doesn’t make it very well. For me, LotR stands the test of time because of the story and the values inherent within, not because of the writing style. I am as big a fan of Tolkien as anyone here but I only read it now (I’ve read it every year for the past 8 years) out of loyalty and love of the story. If I were honest I enjoy reading the latest King/Herbert/Koontz/Pratchett/Lumley/Reilly more. I would be insterested in learning what exactly Mystra did not understand. I would deduce however that the LotR was purhaps a little too mature for her(?).

Fandom is a strange thing; it makes us almost irrational in our analysis of anything even slightly related to the world we have adopted. Remember that he who breaks a thing just to find out how it works has left the path of wisdom…

[ August 03, 2002: Message edited by: TheGentleman ]

RiderOfRohan · 08-02-2002, 12:32 PM

Book. end of discussion. (for me)

Maédhros · 08-02-2002, 01:17 PM

The Book of course. PJ imagination could never rival that of JRRT.

Demloth of Dol Amroth · 08-08-2002, 01:32 AM

yes, the bit on the elves fleeing rivendell makes no sense-yet, there will be a shadow of doubt in the back of my mind til i see TTT myself-what i heard before this was that Narsil would be reforged in TTT(something that happened in book 1 but wasn't seen in the FOTR movie itself) and Arwen would bring it to Aragorn. but if the above rumor is true...et tu, PJ?

maleliel · 08-12-2002, 05:01 AM

Just wanted to say, I don't know whether the Arwen thing is actually true! That's just what I heard! It might be, it might not! We'll just have to wait and see!!! [img]smilies/smile.gif[/img]

08-13-2002, 03:04 PM

Ah! Book VS Movie.

Hmm... Well Tolkien was very very very descriptive in the book, something that is much better interpreted through movies. So much description that I got bored at times! Watching the movie, you could just observe it... I wasn't bored for a SECOND with the movie.

I know that they changed a lot of things, but I believe that the change of Arwen's character was a pretty good one. After all, when I was reading the books, they only had about one or two mentions of Arwen until you find out her and Aragorn get married. I didn't know who the HECK she was! To include her more was a pretty good thing...

Over all-- The movies ruled, the bookes ruled, it all ruled.

Gorothlammothiel · 08-13-2002, 03:25 PM

The Ring ruled Duramarthiel [img]smilies/smile.gif[/img]

Welcome to the downs, may your rest be long and peaceful. An eternity amongst your fellow downers is not long enough! Enjoy your time here [img]smilies/smile.gif[/img]

[ August 13, 2002: Message edited by: Gorothlammothiel ]

07-26-2002, 06:21 PM	#1
nenohantar Guest Posts: n/a	book vs movie the book was better

07-26-2002, 06:30 PM	#2
The Fifth Shade of Carn Dûm Join Date: May 2002 Location: Mordor Posts: 427	The movie was v. great visually and musically, but they butchered the story somewhat. The book was great too, and allowed you to use your imagination. Plus nothing was cut out or added on to it because it was the original. I like both the book and the movie equally. __________________ - Ringwraith #5, Servant of the Eye

07-26-2002, 09:41 PM	#3
Demloth of Dol Amroth Wight Join Date: Apr 2002 Posts: 105	i tend to agree with The Fifth(though it's never wise to upset a ringwraith-i've heard they've nasty tempers...) __________________ One by one the Free Lands of Middle Earth fell to the power of the Ring-but there were some, who resisted...

07-26-2002, 10:18 PM	#4
NyteSky Haunting Spirit Join Date: Apr 2002 Location: Tower of Sorcery and Lore Posts: 76	No. I'm with nenohantar. No matter how good I don't think movies can ever compare to the books they're based on. Especially not LotR. There's simply too much in the books. The movie loses too much in translation. Tho they did an incredible job wi it. The only things that the movie did have that could've used some improvement was the casting of Elrond (sorry, good actor, but he doesn't look like an elf!) and Galadriel. But that's just a personnal opinion anyhow. Fortunately we now have both! Now they just need to come out wi the next 2 movies... __________________ The cure for boredom is curiosity. There is no cure for curiosity. AIM: NightSky717 Email/msn IM: davidone_2000@msn.com

07-26-2002, 11:25 PM	#5
Shadow of Udûn Animated Skeleton Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Sydney Posts: 32	They're so different that you can't compare them.I mean, a movie, even a three hour one, is meant to be short, enjoyed in one blast, and then over. A book is meant to be enjoyed slower. It's not that the books are better, just that they're completely different. I would always enjoy the books more. __________________ What it was could not be seen: it was like a great shadow...

07-26-2002, 11:44 PM	#6
Anorien Wight Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: The Old Navy of Rohan Posts: 138	Well, that was subtle, nenohantar. And completely agree with you. The movies, while they are great image to give color to the words Tolkien already wrote, they do not compare to them. i mean, PJ did a wonderful job, and i give him full marks, but the books are truly the best. i remember the first time I read them, it was sooo awesome, and full of life. I can't wait for TTT to come out, so that i can put pictures to the book, just cause i like to, lol. __________________ FRODO: all low and retarded Oh Mr. Frodo, do you have any more food? Here eat mine, I’m so fat. How about I carry the ring for you. It’s soooo pretty, I mean heavy! SAM: Why you little-! FRODO: You asked for it!

07-26-2002, 11:55 PM	#7
Legolas A Northern Soul Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Valinor Posts: 1,847	I think the main reason that there is so much conflict and satisfaction in some minds between the movie and book is because this is Tolkien. Tolkien was always so descriptive of the scenery that he comes much closer to playing a movie for the reader (than other authors)...it's just that the movie isn't long enough to include all he written. In that sense, the books could be easily translated to a movie because it's a script in itself. The books don't leave so much for personal interpretation (mainly visualization that I'm speaking of) like so many others do, therefore when put to film, any alteration will immediately be frowned upon. The leaving out of parts the author wrote (Old Man Willow, Bombadil, Barrow-Downs) bothers me but is more acceptable than altering what he wrote, modifying it to fit popular culture. I could've hurled when I saw Arwen in the place of Glorfindel. holds stomach Someone said she'd also be at Helm's Deep; is this true? blows chunks I prefer the books, though I do still like the movies. Something about seeing certain moments make it all too real, like the Argonath, for instance. The book, too, has these moments though, and they seem to be more plentiful. Perhaps because I read them first. In any event, I recommend you do the same, even if you saw The Fellowship of the Ring in theatres first. [ July 27, 2002: Message edited by: Legalos ] __________________ ...take counsel with thyself, and remember who and what thou art.

07-28-2002, 07:27 AM	#8
Arwen Undómiel Pile O'Bones Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Sao Paulo Posts: 18	Of Course the book is better!! But is always nice to see what you read in film [img]smilies/biggrin.gif[/img] __________________ Few know whither their road will take them till they come to its end.

07-30-2002, 02:17 PM	#9
maleliel Animated Skeleton Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: UK Posts: 38	I've heard Arwen is at Helms Deep too. Apparently (I'm not sure so don't quote me on this!) her and Elrond flee Rivendell to Lothlorien. Then Arwen leads a band of Elves to Helms Deep to help and all the Elves die except her! Now, I don't know about the rest of you but that just seems wrong! Wrong because Elrond would never flee Rivendell and wrong because the Elves (save Legolas, Elrohir, Elladan e.t.c.) are not meant to be involved in the War of the Ring! Tell me if I'm wrong though! [img]smilies/rolleyes.gif[/img] Anyway, just thought you'd like to know! [img]smilies/smile.gif[/img] I answer to the actual question, I'd agree that you can't really compare the books and the movies. They are both good in their own ways. [img]smilies/smile.gif[/img] __________________ "Even the smallest person can change the course of the future"

07-30-2002, 02:33 PM	#10
Gorothlammothiel Registered User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Sitting in front of my preferred world.... Posts: 254	I believe that the books and the movies can be compared, but that the answer depends on the person. I also believe that to make a judgement on the movies having seen only one and comparing that one to the three (or possibly more) books that we have would be unfair. Personally I think that the books are always superior to a Movie made of them, unless the book came after the movie and was a story based on the film. I think it is to do with originallity. When you read words you paint a picture in your head of all the characters and places, but when you see a film you see pictures of others imaginations and this can lead to disappointment. That disappointment however is not down to anyone involved in making the film, as i'm sure that if I were to make a film, my interpretations of the text would be very different to most others who would want to see it.

07-30-2002, 02:44 PM	#11
mystra Haunting Spirit Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: cyber raga. nuff said. Posts: 88	the movie was good. i understood it better. __________________ "We each must choose our own path. mine had further to go." Cyber Raga. Nuff said.

07-30-2002, 02:55 PM	#12
gollumelfpup Shade of Carn Dûm Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: big...scary...castle... Posts: 277	ya, the movie was kind of eaiser to understand, but you know, movies cant be really confusing or no one will watch them! except crazy ppl like me) the book was an amazing book, and the movie was an amazing movie. [img]smilies/smile.gif[/img] __________________ ~elfpup~ PI's evil family dog!!! I have found the chicken who is not a chicken!

07-30-2002, 02:59 PM	#13
Eruwen Registered User Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 892	I loved the book. It was sooo good. And for about 6 months I thought the book was better. Until now. I don't know why, but my opinion has somewhat changed. I mean, yeah. The movie can NEVER even remotely campare to the great wonders of the book. But, personally, I hate reading. It was these books that got me actually reading again. But I think I like watching the story on a tv or theater screen better than seeing it in my head. {If you understand that.} Anway, my point is, sometimes my imagination doesn't give the book as much credit as it deserves while I'm picturing it in my head. That's why I like watching the movie. Cause it's like I'm seeing Tolkien's imagination come to life and not my own. He can picture it way better than I can. And that is why I like to "watch" the story instead of read it. Ok. I have talked way too long. If anyone understands what I have said, then you are very smart. Cause I don't think I made a bit of sense. Anyway, I'm done now.

07-30-2002, 03:00 PM	#14
mystra Haunting Spirit Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: cyber raga. nuff said. Posts: 88	im gonna be honest. the book was crap. __________________ "We each must choose our own path. mine had further to go." Cyber Raga. Nuff said.

07-30-2002, 03:08 PM	#16
mystra Haunting Spirit Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: cyber raga. nuff said. Posts: 88	yup. __________________ "We each must choose our own path. mine had further to go." Cyber Raga. Nuff said.

07-30-2002, 03:10 PM	#17
gollumelfpup Shade of Carn Dûm Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: big...scary...castle... Posts: 277	[img]smilies/eek.gif[/img] you crazy __________________ ~elfpup~ PI's evil family dog!!! I have found the chicken who is not a chicken!

07-30-2002, 03:18 PM	#18
mystra Haunting Spirit Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: cyber raga. nuff said. Posts: 88	i dont like things i cant understand __________________ "We each must choose our own path. mine had further to go." Cyber Raga. Nuff said.

07-30-2002, 03:18 PM	#19
Brionna Pile O'Bones Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Chico, CA Posts: 13	I think SOMEONE is just trying to get "Tolkienites" all riled up. As for me, of course, of course the book is better than the movie. Can anyone think of an instance when this wasn't true? I think that the movie was very accurate in capturing the spirit of the book. Visually stunning, elegant and powerful- good times! The only real issue I took with the movie was the beefing up of Arwen's part. But then, every Hollywood movie needs a little romance, and if LOTR lacks in any area, it would be there.

07-30-2002, 03:22 PM	#20
mystra Haunting Spirit Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: cyber raga. nuff said. Posts: 88	no im not. and my name is mystra, not someone. and if rimbaud is here, im sorry i lost my temper, and how long am i banned for? *bursts into tears and grovels __________________ "We each must choose our own path. mine had further to go." Cyber Raga. Nuff said.

07-31-2002, 08:40 AM	#22
mystra Haunting Spirit Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: cyber raga. nuff said. Posts: 88	i said why i didnt like it. i didnt understand it. __________________ "We each must choose our own path. mine had further to go." Cyber Raga. Nuff said.

07-31-2002, 10:26 AM	#23
Amanaduial the archer Shadow of Starlight Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: dancing among the ledgerlines... Posts: 2,347	oooh ouch stephanos! well i luv the movie (not slightly becos one of the actors if fine...elwood elwood elwood...) but there is the obvious thing in the movie that u all seem to have somehow overlooked- The barrowdowns was completely left out of the movie! ps. Stephanos- where did u get ure pic or is it someone u know? pps. how did u get to be a moderator so soon? [ July 31, 2002: Message edited by: Amanaduial the archer ] __________________ I am what I was, a harmless little devil

08-01-2002, 10:49 PM	#24
Davin Wight Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Canada Posts: 166	I saw FotR in the theatres before I started reading the books, and I having seen FotR before reading it, I didn't enjoy it as much as when I read TTT and RotK. However, i can't sit down and read an entire LotR book in 3 hours, so I think the movies are good for a solid blast of Middle-earth when ever I feel the need for it. __________________ So do all who live to see such times, but that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to us. »»The Telmena««

08-02-2002, 01:06 AM	#25
Shadow of Udûn Animated Skeleton Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Sydney Posts: 32	That thing about Arwen fleeing Rivendell for helm's deep must be wrong. I know that she's in the next movie, despite not being in the book, but wouldn't PJ get lynched if he tried that? I mean, enough people got angry when he replaced glorfindel with her (which i reckon was good, anyway) but he wouldn't make her like some kind of general. At least I hope he doesn't. It would ruin that bit for me if he did. __________________ What it was could not be seen: it was like a great shadow...

08-02-2002, 02:49 AM	#26
TheGentleman Guest Posts: n/a	Shadow of Udûn suggested that you cannot compare the two, Gorothlammothiel suggested that you can. This is a classic example of arguing the wrong point. People these days are too involved in seeing whether or not they can, they do not stop to think whether they should. A valid, fair, and comprehensive comparison of the two works may well be possible, but why even attempt it? What would be gained from the analysis? Surely the two deserve to be judge on their own merit? Considering the time Tolkien put into LotR it should be judge as an individual’s unique work; conversely, considering the thousands of people involved in the creation of the LotR film (the actors, film crew, make-up artists, musicians, designers) it should be judged as a unique group effort. In my view a comparison of the two is moot. I agree that you can judge the film on its reflection of the book, Tolkien did this himself with the Ralf Bakshi film (and was rather scathing). This is not a comparison, rather a critique. What Tolkien did was give his (authoritive) opinion on where the film failed in its portrayal of his book, he did not do this in order to announce that “it wasn’t as good as the book”, he was simply judging the film on its own (poor) merits. Mystra makes a perfectly valid point, she(?) just doesn’t make it very well. For me, LotR stands the test of time because of the story and the values inherent within, not because of the writing style. I am as big a fan of Tolkien as anyone here but I only read it now (I’ve read it every year for the past 8 years) out of loyalty and love of the story. If I were honest I enjoy reading the latest King/Herbert/Koontz/Pratchett/Lumley/Reilly more. I would be insterested in learning what exactly Mystra did not understand. I would deduce however that the LotR was purhaps a little too mature for her(?). Fandom is a strange thing; it makes us almost irrational in our analysis of anything even slightly related to the world we have adopted. Remember that he who breaks a thing just to find out how it works has left the path of wisdom… [ August 03, 2002: Message edited by: TheGentleman ]

08-02-2002, 12:32 PM	#27
RiderOfRohan Animated Skeleton Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Rohan Posts: 40	Book. end of discussion. (for me) __________________ I am never late, nor am I early. I arrive exactly when I want to! I feel so uninspired. Mind Altering drugs, that's what Ineed!

08-02-2002, 01:17 PM	#28
Maédhros The Kinslayer Join Date: May 2002 Location: Formenos Posts: 658	The Book of course. PJ imagination could never rival that of JRRT. __________________ "Alas, poor Yorick! I knew him, Horatio; a fellow of infinite jest, of most excellent fancy."

08-08-2002, 01:32 AM	#29
Demloth of Dol Amroth Wight Join Date: Apr 2002 Posts: 105	yes, the bit on the elves fleeing rivendell makes no sense-yet, there will be a shadow of doubt in the back of my mind til i see TTT myself-what i heard before this was that Narsil would be reforged in TTT(something that happened in book 1 but wasn't seen in the FOTR movie itself) and Arwen would bring it to Aragorn. but if the above rumor is true...et tu, PJ? __________________ One by one the Free Lands of Middle Earth fell to the power of the Ring-but there were some, who resisted...

08-12-2002, 05:01 AM	#30
maleliel Animated Skeleton Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: UK Posts: 38	Just wanted to say, I don't know whether the Arwen thing is actually true! That's just what I heard! It might be, it might not! We'll just have to wait and see!!! [img]smilies/smile.gif[/img] __________________ "Even the smallest person can change the course of the future"

08-13-2002, 03:04 PM	#31
Duramarthiel Guest Posts: n/a	Ah! Book VS Movie. Hmm... Well Tolkien was very very very descriptive in the book, something that is much better interpreted through movies. So much description that I got bored at times! Watching the movie, you could just observe it... I wasn't bored for a SECOND with the movie. I know that they changed a lot of things, but I believe that the change of Arwen's character was a pretty good one. After all, when I was reading the books, they only had about one or two mentions of Arwen until you find out her and Aragorn get married. I didn't know who the HECK she was! To include her more was a pretty good thing... Over all-- The movies ruled, the bookes ruled, it all ruled.

08-13-2002, 03:25 PM	#32
Gorothlammothiel Registered User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Sitting in front of my preferred world.... Posts: 254	The Ring ruled Duramarthiel [img]smilies/smile.gif[/img] Welcome to the downs, may your rest be long and peaceful. An eternity amongst your fellow downers is not long enough! Enjoy your time here [img]smilies/smile.gif[/img] [ August 13, 2002: Message edited by: Gorothlammothiel ]