Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
07-05-2014, 11:10 PM | #1 |
Haunting Spirit
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 55
|
Fingolfin's Death - Suicide?
It was not on this forum but another Tolkien board that I found via Google back wheN i first read The Silmarillion. One of the things that got me to read The Sil in the first place was the high praise I had heard from people about how awesome Fingolfin was. But this other board I mentioned, people were none too sympathetic or appreciative. According to them Fingolfin was a fool who charged needlessly to certain death when it would have been better if he had lived. Their argument was that he knew who and what Morgoth was and that challenging him was certainly going to end in his own death and thus he was an idiot for doing it.
What are your thoughts on the last battle of Fingolfin? Heroic and brave or just desperate and sad? |
07-06-2014, 03:35 AM | #2 | |
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 265
|
Quote:
I read somewhere today, "If you do something for yourself it dies with you, if you do something for the world it remains in the world forever." Not the proper quote. So, this is what Fingolfin did, I think. If I'm wrong please correct me.
__________________
A short saying oft contains much wisdom. ~Sophocles |
|
07-06-2014, 07:29 AM | #3 | |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
|
Consider the circumstances leading Fingolfin to despair. From a Wikipedia summary:
Quote:
__________________
The poster formerly known as Tuor of Gondolin. Walking To Rivendell and beyond 12,555 miles passed Nt./Day 5: Pass the beacon on Nardol, the 'Fire Hill.' |
|
07-06-2014, 08:23 AM | #4 | |
Spectre of Decay
|
The Last Ditch
I think the Silmarillion makes it more than clear that Fingolfin could see no way of defeating Morgoth from the position of the Noldor after the Nirnaeth Arnoediad.
Quote:
Fingolfin has nothing to lose, at least in his own estimation. The ultimate hope for the defeat of Morgoth lies in the as-yet unborn Eärendil, so only faith that Morgoth would eventually fall would have sustained him, a faith that would have no clear path to that end in sight. He's blinded by rage and despair, and not thinking tactically, but no tactic could reverse the hopeless situation in which he finds himself. Then there's the possibility of victory. Fingolfin managed to inflict seven wounds on Morgoth: although he undoubtedly expected to die, he had a slim chance of bypassing his enemy's military victory by defeating him in single combat. I would never call him a fool for preferring one hopeless death-or-glory assault to a slow, creeping defeat; but inevitably he's judged by some in terms of the final outcome, known to them but not to the character. The word most commonly used by Tolkien to describe this sort of mood in his characters is fey, in its (archaic and chiefly Scottish) sense of 'fated to die, doomed to death', and his characters are often at their most awe-inspiring when acting under it, liberated by complete certainty of failure from the fear of either defeat or death. When showing characters acting in this way, Tolkien is at his least Christian, although his overall narrative usually places their actions in a wider context that shows their lack of faith to be the cause of their downfall. The great set pieces of Northern medieval literature are last stands: Gunnar at bay in his home against his killers in Brennu Njals Saga; Byrhtwald and the bodyguard of Byrhtnoth on the battlefield at Maldon; even the ultimate fate of the gods at Ragnarök in Voluspá, and Tolkien found much to admire in what is often called the 'northern heroic spirit': a philosophy of ultimate endurance in an undertaking beyond hope of success, relief or survival. Crucially this is a spirit that can only be diluted by the hope and faith that form such a key part of the Christian message, so that Tolkien is forced into a delicate balancing act between showing the certainty of defeat in the microcosm and demonstrating ultimate hope in his wider narrative. In any case, and returning to the point, I think that we are supposed to realise that Fingolfin cannot defeat Morgoth, but I also think that we are meant to admire him for preferring to face his enemy despite the near-certainty of failure rather than to hide and watch his cause gradually bleed to death.
__________________
Man kenuva métim' andúne? Last edited by The Squatter of Amon Rûdh; 07-06-2014 at 11:35 AM. |
|
07-06-2014, 08:26 AM | #5 | |
Blossom of Dwimordene
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: The realm of forgotten words
Posts: 10,407
|
It was suicidal, but it was not suicide. It was heroic, but more so desperate. I think it can be all at the same time, which is exactly why this is one of my favourite bits of The Sil.
For Lotrelf, here is the description of the duel: Quote:
EDIT: xed with Squatter EDIT2: Finished copying the passage.
__________________
You passed from under darkened dome, you enter now the secret land. - Take me to Finrod's fabled home!... ~ Finrod: The Rock Opera Last edited by Galadriel55; 07-06-2014 at 07:12 PM. |
|
07-06-2014, 10:15 AM | #6 |
Curmudgeonly Wordwraith
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ensconced in curmudgeonly pursuits
Posts: 2,509
|
I concur with Squatter's use of the word "fey" in this instance, a concept (O.E. faege) that is an outcome of "weird" or fate, that an Anglo-Saxon warrior like Beowulf would certainly understand. To become fey is to foresee one's own death and against all counsel seek that death, usually in battle against impossible odds, and die gloriously.
And like Squatter inferred, this fey death of Fingolfin is a pagan concept that would not be considered suicide by Fingolfin's peers and family; on the contrary, as Tolkien portrayed it, the high king's death is given the laudatory verse Anglo-Saxons reserved for their greatest heroes.
__________________
And your little sister's immaculate virginity wings away on the bony shoulders of a young horse named George who stole surreptitiously into her geography revision. |
07-06-2014, 10:37 AM | #7 |
Animated Skeleton
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 36
|
Fingy was beside himself with rage and grief, he was so mad and heart broke that he wasn't thinking clear. Ive seen alot of people get so mad they do stuff that they normally wouldn't do. I have been in that situation myself. This is the case here he was so mad his "eyes shone like the eyes of the Valar". He was in such a rage that the only thing he could think about was hurting Morgoth anyway he could. I agree with Inziladun. Eomer was in a similar situation on the Pelennor, the thing that brought him out of it was seeing Aragon's standard with the fleet. He was already arraying his troops in a shield wall to fight to the last on foot when the black ships came. I dont think either of them wanted to die, but that wasn't a concern. The main thing that they both wanted was to hurt the enemy as much as possible.
__________________
Fingolfin.....He passed over Dor-nu-fauglith like wind amid dust, and all that beheld his onslaught fled in amaze, thinking Orome himself was come: for a great madness of rage was upon him, so that his eyes shone like the eyes of the Valar. Last edited by Yregwyn; 07-16-2014 at 01:00 PM. |
07-06-2014, 07:32 PM | #8 | |
Gruesome Spectre
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Heaven's doorstep
Posts: 8,037
|
I put Fingolfin's attack on Morgoth in the same vein as that of the Rohirrim at the Battle of the Pelennor in ROTK.
There Éomer, seeing the apparent death of his uncle and sister, Quote:
In both instances there is a moment of despair, followed by a white-hot rage to avenge, and though I don't think dying in the act was the preferred outcome, neither Fingolfin nor Éomer were concerned at all for their safety.
__________________
Music alone proves the existence of God. |
|
07-06-2014, 07:39 PM | #9 | |||
Blossom of Dwimordene
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: The realm of forgotten words
Posts: 10,407
|
Quote:
Quote:
But here, judging at least from your first paragraph in the quote, do you think that the Christian part is really present to such etent in Fingolfin's challenge? Do you really think his lack of faith was a failure? I think that the northern spirit far outrules the Christian aspect in this scenario. I don't think Fingolfin's act or mood was failure, nor do I think that there is any hint of condemnation of them in the story that would make the reader think that way. Quote:
PS: I have edited the remainder of the text into my previous post, for anyone who wants to read the passage.
__________________
You passed from under darkened dome, you enter now the secret land. - Take me to Finrod's fabled home!... ~ Finrod: The Rock Opera |
|||
07-09-2014, 12:27 PM | #10 | |
Spectre of Decay
|
Yes it was, which does slightly undermine some of my arguments. D'oh!
Quote:
__________________
Man kenuva métim' andúne? |
|
07-10-2014, 10:57 AM | #11 |
Loremaster of Annúminas
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,321
|
Well, Legate, that's a valid point; but it's a bit hard to square with Tolkien's stern criticisms of both old-Beowulf and Beorhtnoth, for suicidal glory-seeking which resulted in disaster for those whom they had a duty to rule and protect.
__________________
The entire plot of The Lord of the Rings could be said to turn on what Sauron didn’t know, and when he didn’t know it. |
07-15-2014, 02:17 PM | #12 |
Spectre of Decay
|
I'm not Legate, although we do look quite similar in this light.
Tolkien's criticism of both Byrhtnoth and Beowulf is that they succumbed to chivalry; ceding key advantages to the enemy out of pride and the desire for glory (Byrhtnoth in allowing his enemy free passage over the Blackwater, Beowulf by fighting the dragon single-handed when he had other men with him). He's at some pains in the Silmarillion version to point out that Fingolfin already deemed the strategic position to be hopeless and was acting in rage and grief. If the cause of the Noldor is already lost then the death of the king only speeds up the inevitable, and there is no advantage to be given away when the battle has already ended in defeat. This is not the only example of this sort of behaviour from a prince of the Noldor either: Finrod lays aside his kingship to fulfil an obligation to Beren's house and dies in the attempt without apparent criticism from the narrator. Unlike Beowulf and Beorhtnoth (and Earnur of Gondor, who is portrayed consistently as the dupe of Sauron), in these cases the characters have no position of security or strength to abandon and are therefore not able to make the same mistake as Beorhtnoth and Beowulf. The line is a fine one, but Tolkien draws it himself in his notes on ofermod. The matter of Tolkien's opinion is further complicated by the separation of some thirty years between the first version of Fingolfin's battle with Morgoth and Tolkien's appraisal of the Anglo-Saxon heroes in The Homecoming of Beorhtnoth. A younger man wrote Fingolfin's last stand than the one who criticised Beorhtnoth's and Beowulf's stubborn pride, and it wouldn't be the only issue on which Tolkien changed his mind over the years. In the case of Byrhtnoth of Essex at least, I think that Tolkien judges on too little evidence and presumes far too much factual accuracy in the Maldon fragment. I think that any criticism of Byrhtnoth's pride in that piece is a Christian writer trying to explain why God didn't help so valiant and pious a hero of the church against pagan savages, but that's beside the point. Tolkien read the Anglo-Saxon poet's accusation as a tactical criticism and agreed with it, but that doesn't mean that every example of one of his leader heroes apparently throwing everything away in a single gesture should be read in the same way.
__________________
Man kenuva métim' andúne? Last edited by The Squatter of Amon Rûdh; 07-18-2014 at 04:23 AM. |
|
|