Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
05-22-2014, 07:05 AM | #1 | ||
Shade of Carn Dūm
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 265
|
Gollum's sacrifice
Professor, in one his letters, states that if Sam had not be harsh on Gollum, Gollum would have sacrificed himself.
Quote:
Quote:
Later, he says that Gollum would have sacrificed his life for Frodo's sake. How was that possible when the pressure of the One was too great for the person who was strongest when it came to resisting it? When Frodo "gave in" and could not do what he desired to, how Gollum could have done: knowing he could not use the Ring, and sacrificing himself?
__________________
A short saying oft contains much wisdom. ~Sophocles |
||
05-22-2014, 07:56 AM | #2 | ||
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 785
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"Since the evening of that day we have journeyed from the shadow of Tol Brandir." "On foot?" cried Éomer. |
||
05-22-2014, 08:33 AM | #3 | ||
Shade of Carn Dūm
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 435
|
Quote:
What I DO think would probably be the case had Sam not done what he did would twofold. First he probably would have warned them about Shelob and the risk they were getting into. Second he probably would have gone into the cave with them. Gollum would have been a perfect guide in that case, he has incredible night vision (and so could guide then even with all of Shelob's vomited darkness all over the place, and has made it through before (so probably knows the beast hidey holes in the tunnel. At bare minimum, that would probably mean Frodo not being bitten, or failing that Sam knowing not to abandon Frodo's body (Depending on how long gollum spent in the cave the first time, and how much he saw of Shelob and the orcs, he may be well aware that a bite from her is not fatal) as well as an extra pair of hands to carry him till he wakes up (Gollum is quite strong for his build, so he probably could deadman handle Frodo on his own, if allowed.) More than likey they also would not have had to bother with the tower of Cirith Ungol at all. If they slipped by Shelob unnoticed, no alert would have been sounded, so no guards would have been patrolling. That would techically mean dealing with a guard tower still filled with it's compliment of orcs, but something tells me that sneaking by that would have been a lesser challenge than Shelob. Quote:
This all sounds a little shaky, but part of the problem is that with gollum, the rings corrution is so inherent in who he is that it is hard making scenario's where he can beat it off even temporarily a little hard to concetualize. |
||
05-22-2014, 08:45 AM | #4 | |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 785
|
Quote:
I suppose the next question is what would have happened on the other side. Would they have evaded the Orcs guarding the pass?
__________________
"Since the evening of that day we have journeyed from the shadow of Tol Brandir." "On foot?" cried Éomer. |
|
05-22-2014, 10:08 AM | #5 | |
Haunting Spirit
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 80
|
Quote:
Only too clearly Sam saw how hopeless it would be for him to creep down under those many-eyed walls and pass the watchful gate. And even if he did so, he could not go far on the guarded road beyond: not even the black shadows, lying deep where the red glow could not reach, would shield him long from the night-eyed orcs.They'd also have to pass very close by the Silent Watchers, who were already "uneasy", according to Gorbag (and the Nazgul too, according to Shagrat), while Frodo and Sam were still climbing the pass. But that brings up another point, which is that the patrols might very well have been sent out anyway, even if Gollum hadn't precipitated the encounter with Shelob. How would that have played out, if our three steadfast adventurers had successfully slipped past the Spider, if Frodo wasn't camatose, and still in possession of the Ring? In any case, it seems to me it would take at least a smallish eucatastrophe for them to pass the tower safely, Shelob or no. And there's at least a good chance they'd still have to deal with both, even without Gollum's treachery. |
|
05-22-2014, 10:38 AM | #6 |
Shade of Carn Dūm
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 265
|
I feel Gollum is being seen something he is not, and Professor did not mean him to be: good or saint-like(for the lack of the right word). I don't think Professor (and Frodo, too) really meant that Gollum would do much good(in the text, not the letters). In his letters, he does have some hope for him, but is that only blown by Sam? Why Sam is "accused" of something he cannot be considered guilty for? I feel Gollum would have betrayed them even if it wasn't for Sam. His desire for the Ring would increase, and also his love for Frodo. Would Gollum really be able to feel the affection he has for Frodo-after all he was NOT morally good? As for his sacrifice-- I find it hard to imagine him sacrificing himself for someone else's sake- even if it was Frodo. The letter you're talking about, Zigؓr, says something else. Professor does not say "Frodo would have sacrificed himself", he instead says that Frodo would have to do the same- sacrificing himself. If he hadn't done so, he'd have failed. Frodo's (Gollum's too) sacrifices would depend on their Free Will. By the end of the book Frodo did not have Free Will, what makes you think Gollum would?
P. S. I apologise as my posts are only about asking questions, instead of answering them.
__________________
A short saying oft contains much wisdom. ~Sophocles |
05-22-2014, 10:44 AM | #7 |
Shade of Carn Dūm
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 435
|
I suppose that is true. I'd like to say that they'd have the advantage that Gollum at least has actually gone toe to toe with orcs and won (assuming you take the usual conceit of assuming the orcs and goblins are one) but those 1. were young orcs 2. were single orcs 3. was on his home turf and 4. was while he was wearing the ring (which as I pointed out, would probably not be a smart move so close to Sauron, especially for someone already so deeply enthralled by it.) They again would have the andvantage of Gollum having as good (if not better) night vision than the orcs, but that really only works if the orcs sent one or two foot soldiers to investigate up close. If they sent out a large group, or simply adopted a "shoot first and ask questions later" approach to a band of three mysterios strangers (given how close they would have to pass, there are probably several orcish archers in the tower with good enough eyes to shoot them in a manner that would not immediately kill them (so they could be questioned) but leave them incapable of escaping.)
I guess we are getting into a plot corner. It's not only a matter of Gollums redemption changing the focus of the narritive from that point on, it's looking more and more like his lack of betrayal makes the narritive as it stands IMPOSSIBLE from that point on. In a certain sense, Gollums betreyal is NECCECARY for the mission to suceed. No wounded frodo means no Mithrl coat found, no mithril coat means no infighting to decimate the tower, no decimation means no way to get past. |
05-22-2014, 11:10 AM | #8 | |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 785
|
Perhaps their Lórien-cloaks - Frodo would of course still have his - would have aided their cause?
Quote:
Frodo in this tale actually takes the Ring and claims it, and certainly he too would have had a clear vision - but he was not given any time: he was immediately attacked by Gollum. When Sauron was aware of the seizure of the Ring his one hope was in its power: that the claimant would be unable to relinquish it until Sauron had time to deal with him. Frodo too would then probably, if not attacked, have had to take the same way: cast himself with the Ring into the abyss. If not he would of course have completely failed.So what Professor Tolkien is saying here is that had Gollum not attacked, Frodo would have come to this realisation: he could either go forth and confront Sauron (impossible - he had claimed the Ring, but had to no degree mastered it: in such a confrontation Frodo would be "utterly overthrown") or throw himself into the Fire and so deny Sauron the Ring while simultaneously not having to live without it. We can see here that in this case destroying the Ring has a selfish aspect to it: not destroying the Ring to save the people of Middle-earth, but purely to spite Sauron and serve one's own (corrupt) self-interest. That's why I can see this option as being entirely possible within the Ring-corrupted mindset. Professor Tolkien of course states that it is not definite: the claimant might become sufficiently arrogantly deluded to exit the Sammath Naur with the encouragement of the Nazgūl and be destroyed by Sauron, but the point is that either choice (trying to wield the Ring or destroying it) was possible within the Ring-corrupted mindset because of the selfish and non-righteous motivations which would be behind destroying the Ring in this scenario.
__________________
"Since the evening of that day we have journeyed from the shadow of Tol Brandir." "On foot?" cried Éomer. Last edited by Zigūr; 05-22-2014 at 11:14 AM. |
|
05-22-2014, 07:14 PM | #9 | ||
Shade of Carn Dūm
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 265
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
A short saying oft contains much wisdom. ~Sophocles |
||
05-22-2014, 08:33 PM | #10 |
Shade of Carn Dūm
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 435
|
It's a little complicated to explain, but I'll try.
It has to do with Frodo's possible motivation for throwing himself in with the ring, had he done so. in the scenario he puts out (and that Tolkien's letter seems to insinuate) the destruction of the ring becomes less about destroying the ring and more about doing whatever is necessary to keep Sauron for being able to get it. The ring bearer still wants to posses the ring, and cannot bear to give it up, but realizes that he does not have sufficient power to maintain his grip on it should it come down to an actual face off against Sauron; that Sauron will defeat them and take the ring from them, and there is nothing they can do to stop him. So they throw themselves in with the ring so that they can keep Sauron from getting it without having to give it up themselves. Right up until the moment they die, the ring is theirs and theirs alone. It's sort of a "dog in the manger" situation. |
05-22-2014, 08:53 PM | #11 | ||
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 785
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"Since the evening of that day we have journeyed from the shadow of Tol Brandir." "On foot?" cried Éomer. |
||
05-22-2014, 11:36 PM | #12 | |
Shade of Carn Dūm
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 430
|
Quote:
Beings who take that road, such as Gollum, and who then begin the great, arduous journey back, are particularly susceptible to succumbing again, to that process that subverted them in the first place. Samwise, through his overuse of scorn, re-shamed Gollum, which was to reopen that very wound in Sméagol's mind where he separated himself from his people, and became two personalities. Sam's was a cane for his own back in re-entrapping Sméagol within Gollum's control. Gollum only had the balance of power in the dual-personality structure where Sméagol had no join to other souls. What Frodo offered Gollum, was, through identifying with Sméagol's suffering, a love-join for Sméagol, which tilted the balance of power back to Sméagol for a while. That's because Sméagol could identify with Frodo's suffering as Ringbearer, preventing Gollum from getting hold. Until this time, there had not been any living being who Sméagol felt 'seen' and 'understood' by. Frodo's empathy (the love join), then, was a dispelling of great darkness in Gollum's mind, and a point of flow of 'seeing' from Frodo into Gollum. Sméagol must have felt great love for Frodo because of this great power that was Frodo's kindness. Samwise Gamgee sacrificed all that. |
|
05-25-2014, 01:57 AM | #13 |
Shade of Carn Dūm
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 265
|
Aha! Thanks, everyone. I'm proved wrong, and I'm glad for that!
__________________
A short saying oft contains much wisdom. ~Sophocles |
|
|