Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
12-30-2011, 07:15 AM | #1 |
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 435
|
Of Ents and Immortality
A few questions, brought on by current threads.
1. Do Ents have the same "conditional" immortality as elves. That is, they are slayable but do not die of old age? 2. If they don't, what happens to them when they die? Do Entish spirits go off to an unknown place like those of men? 3. If they do, do they also eventually travel west? if so, how? do they also take ship. since they may not have to breathe (I honestly don't know if Ents breate) do the simply walk the path under the sea the elvish ships take? 4. Since older ents seem to become treeish in thier age, is the untimate fate of any ent to simple become so "treeish" that their animation and consciosness departs them, and they became for all intentent and purposes, indistinguishable from an "ordinary" tree? (I can't help but think of a parallel here with what Terry Prachett says happens when a troll gets advanaced in years.) Some of these questions seem semi important. Since the fourth age is the age of men, and it seems that all of the other sentient races are dwindling, this would presumably include the Ent's. While Aragorn's gift to them of dominion of Fangorn in perpetuit, with a freedom to expand to other areas if Fangorn get's too small for the population is certinly noble, kind and fitting, I can't help but feel that it may also be sort of pointless, and Aragorn (depending on how much he knows of the Entish situation) may sort of know this. Without the Entwives, there can presumably be no more little Ents (Entlings?) so the population will never increase, just go down. A cynical part of my brain seems to think that, in a few centuries, if a later king changes his mind and wishes to put Fangorn to mannish use, he will find no ents around to oppose him, probably no Huorns either. |
12-30-2011, 08:43 AM | #2 | |
A Voice That Gainsayeth
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: In that far land beyond the Sea
Posts: 7,431
|
Well, there is one important thing that needs to be included first and foremost.
The Ents are not the Children of Ilúvatar. And they are, I believe, even distant from the Dwarves, who are the "Children of Aulë" with the gift of life given to them by Eru. But the Ents do not have the "real life" in this sense, obviously. Therefore, one can start questioning whatever happens to them when they die: I, at least, believe that there is no way they would participate in any "afterlife" in Valinor - and obviously, they do not share the fate of Men, either. I think, if they are close to anything, they are close to animals, or... ...or something else. I believe the key to understanding lies in the Silmarillion, in the chapter "Of Aulë and Yavanna". We hear about the origin of the Eagles and Ents, who are named there together - so in fact, the way I see it, the Eagles are something similar to the Ents. Yavanna speaks about her concern that the trees are defenseless, yet says she did sing about something like that in her part during the Music, and Eru then replies to Manwë that he of course is aware of that, and that Quote:
But in any case, it seems that those spirits are past the simple "mortal dialectic" and whatever happens to them after death is likely leaving their body (tree...) and maybe returning back to Eru or wherever it was they came from. Personally, I am also wondering whether the Ents fit into a similar cathegory as the Dragons (creations of Morgoth in a similar manner) or the Werewolves, of whom we hear a similar story: "evil spirits" (in this case) placed into a beast's form. But yes, as for the first question: I think the Ents do "work" that way that they don't age much (remember Treebeard talking about his walks during the First Age), at most they can become "treeish" (maybe the spirit gets "tired" and goes "asleep"?). But of course, they can be killed (by destroying the "corpse", however, the spirit probably simply goes back to its maker again?).
__________________
"Should the story say 'he ate bread,' the dramatic producer can only show 'a piece of bread' according to his taste or fancy, but the hearer of the story will think of bread in general and picture it in some form of his own." -On Fairy-Stories Last edited by Legate of Amon Lanc; 12-30-2011 at 08:47 AM. |
|
12-30-2011, 09:30 AM | #3 |
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 435
|
Under those circumstances, one begins to wonder if by the Third age, the line between Ent and Huorn was more or less an academic one, if there was a point where the ents had become so like trees and the trees (huorns) so like Ent's that there was functionally no difference between the two in term of anything but what they had started out as. Indeed while i simply assumed that a young ent needed an ent and an entwife to come into being, if they are spirits inhabiting trees, maybe the Huorns are Ent children(ore more accurately, a phase of ent development) maybe after a Huorn has live long enough and become Entish enough, it is an Ent. Then the possibility of them needing expansion room evetually makes sense.
|
12-30-2011, 10:13 AM | #4 | |
Guard of the Citadel
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oxon
Posts: 2,205
|
Interesting thread! I have taken the liberty to copy/paste part of a nice study on the origins and the history of the Ents posted by Andreas Moehn here http://lalaith.vpsurf.de/Tolkien/Fr_ents.html
The abbreviations used below are also explained at the bottom of the linked page. Quote:
__________________
“The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike.”
Delos B. McKown Last edited by The Might; 12-30-2011 at 12:18 PM. |
|
12-30-2011, 10:54 AM | #5 |
A Mere Boggart
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: under the bed
Posts: 4,737
|
I have another take on this.
An Ent is not a tree, it's a giant. It's a tree shepherd, a being brought into Arda to protect the trees which can very much have the appearance of trees, and rather like a master may come to look a bit like his dog, an Ent can come to look like the trees he shepherds. Ent is also the Old English word for 'giant', with a concurrent word in Old Norse - jotunn. Giant lore is something I've not looked into agreat deal because I find them frankly a bit scary (don't laugh ) and unappealing, but Ents as giants I find an appealing idea. I think that as they age, they become more like a tree and might become as static as a tree so that to the untrained eye, they are a tree. Some of these Ents may, I suppose be termed 'Huorns', though that's highly debatable. There's something interesting that was posted a few years back (and I've been trying to find this) about how a 'houseless Elf', that is one who has been killed, may choose not to go to the Halls of Mandos and instead remain a houseless fea and maybe inhabit elements of the earth itself, such as rocks and trees. I think that is also a possibility for some Huorns. And for others, that they are simply trees that are capable, if pushed, of movement and speech.
__________________
Gordon's alive!
|
|
|