![]() |
"What! a furrier, a man that calls rabbits conies, when he doesn't turn their skins into squirrels?" Bilbo Baggins |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
![]() |
#24 |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 903
![]() |
Somebody here - perhaps davem or WCH - told a story a while back about JRRT himself attending a school play of THE HOBBIT. If I remember right, Tolkien beamed broad smiles when they they kept exactly to a scene or some bit of dialogue but became displeased and agitated whenever they deviated in any way. I guess that speaks volumes as why Hollywood is loathe to give authors anything approaching control when their work is translated from print to film.
Maybe that is why he enjoyed the radio production so much. Things do not have to be so heavily cut given that you have much more time and can serialize things over weeks or months. On the radio you can have a narrator which is much closer to a book. And this is just a guess on my part - but I bet its much cheaper to use the book as a script where possible given that you save money from writers having to rewrite anything. I have a feeling that given this choice Film A - very loyal in both script and spirit to Tolkien almost to the point of slavishness. At the box office it barely makes it money back and people find it too long with too many talking heads and dull parts. Film B - Jackson action treatment with Jackson big box office results. I tend to think that both JRRT and CT would vote loudly and often for the A choice. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |