Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
08-20-2005, 10:58 AM | #1 |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,448
|
Why Bilbo?
I've searched for this and can't find it maybe I didn't look hard enough, however my question, is why did Gandalf choose Bilbo to go with the dwarves. and if I recall From where i do not recall however this may by something in my head fro no reason Gandalf wanted dwarves in the lonely mountain for defense against sauron(again where i got that i dont know) my point is all sidethoughts aside(ha) why did Gandalf pick Bilbo to go, weren't there more adventurous hobbits down the river? in crickhallow or some such place?
__________________
Morsul the Resurrected |
08-20-2005, 01:27 PM | #2 |
Auspicious Wraith
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 4,859
|
It's explained in 'The Quest of Erebor' in Unfinished Tales. Definitely worth a read.
__________________
Los Ingobernables de Harlond |
09-12-2005, 06:08 PM | #3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I always thought that it was an underlining plot of the The Hobbit. That Gandalf had chosen Bilbo to partake in the quest, yet at this stage Bilbo had no idea why he was to be chosen, after all he was just a lowly Hobbit with no battle\quest experience what so ever.
But by the end of the book, they have come back to the point of why Gandalf insisted that Bilbo tagged along and it is somewhat reconciled After all he does save the Dwarves butts more than twice. So I believe it comes to the conclusion that Gandalf saw something in Bilbo that no one else (including the Hobbit himself) saw, and that was confirmed in victory at the end of the book. |
09-12-2005, 06:45 PM | #4 | ||
Riveting Ribbiter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Assigned to Mordor
Posts: 1,767
|
The Quest of Erebor is a very interesting read. In brief, Gandalf remembered Bilbo from his last trip to the Shire as young hobbit who wanted to learn more about the world outside of the Shire. He was also noted even then for being odd and talking to strangers, including Dwarves.
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect. But actually, from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint, it's more like a big ball of wibbly-wobbly, timey-wimey... stuff. |
||
09-13-2005, 01:14 AM | #5 |
Spirit of the Lonely Star
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,133
|
I am as fascinated by the discussion of Bilbo in Unfinished Tales as you are. But there is one thought that always comes popping into my head. Did Tolkien feel this way when he wrote The Hobbit, or even when he began to put pen to paper for the Lord of the Rings, or was this a much later revelation? Perhaps even a revelation that came in writng the final pages of the Return of the King.
How much of the hand of Providence was there in the beginning of the tale, and how much was a later addition? In view of the fact that Tolkien in his Letters clearly alludes to the fact that LotR was explicitly Christian 'in its revisions', exactly when did this make itself felt? There was another thread discussing this in books some time ago (started by Littlemanpoet), but we never really reached a conclusion.
__________________
Multitasking women are never too busy to vote. |
09-13-2005, 04:30 PM | #6 |
Riveting Ribbiter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Assigned to Mordor
Posts: 1,767
|
Is that the "...And Consciously So in the Revision" thread?
I had forgotten about the time frame and revision aspect of the UT quote. All of the versions given have Gandalf referring to another force directing his choice of Bilbo. But at the same time, since all are written as a narrative from Frodo after the destruction of the Ring, they are revised versions of the story from after the LOTR became the completion of The Hobbit. So I guess the question is one of Tolkien's original intention when writing The Hobbit. I don't have a good answer to the question of the original process that went into the creation of Bilbo's story (especially not with a major exam Friday - I can't really research anything now). Then again, does the stated intention given in the revision supercede an initial purpose to write a story that did not involve Providence in Bilbo's selection?
__________________
People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect. But actually, from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint, it's more like a big ball of wibbly-wobbly, timey-wimey... stuff. |
09-13-2005, 09:16 PM | #7 |
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Halls of Mandos
Posts: 332
|
I don't have the book with me, so I can't give an exact quote, but methinks Chapter XIX "The Last Stage" may shed some light on whether Tolkien intended Providence to play a role in The Hobbit from the beginning. Check out the conversation between Gandalf and Bilbo that happens at the very end of the book. They're not exactly talking about Eru, but I think we can catch the drift.
__________________
"If you're referring to the incident with the dragon, I was barely involved. All I did was give your uncle a little nudge out of the door." THE HOBBIT - IT'S COMING |
09-17-2005, 07:47 AM | #8 | |
Riveting Ribbiter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Assigned to Mordor
Posts: 1,767
|
Quote:
__________________
People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect. But actually, from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint, it's more like a big ball of wibbly-wobbly, timey-wimey... stuff. |
|
09-18-2005, 05:21 AM | #9 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
|
Chapter XIX does not help to answer Child's question, I think.
Child is clearly right that all versions of "The Quest of Erebor" were written in 1955 when Tolkien prepaired the Appendices for the "The Return of the King". Thus the idea of providence guiding Gandalf to chose Bilbo is clearly an after thought. Also chapter XIX of the Hobbit was written long after chapter I. As fare as we know "The Hobbit" was not written in one contious efford. The story was left for a longtime unfinished ending with the death of Smaug. Thus even Gandalf talking to Bilbo about his rôle in the quest and hinting at providence as a important force is as well an after thought of Tolkien refelcting on story written years before. Respectfully Findegil |
09-18-2005, 08:58 AM | #10 | |
Riveting Ribbiter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Assigned to Mordor
Posts: 1,767
|
Quote:
Anyone have an annotated copy?
__________________
People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect. But actually, from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint, it's more like a big ball of wibbly-wobbly, timey-wimey... stuff. |
|
09-18-2005, 05:58 PM | #11 | |
Dead Serious
|
Quote:
__________________
I prefer history, true or feigned.
|
|
08-26-2006, 08:53 AM | #12 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Why Bilbo
I think gandalf picked bilbo because he knew that bilbo deep inside would really of liked and adventure. Of course I am not possitive about this, because I am doing a report on the Hobbit and need to know this yet I do not... So yes if anyone knows please respond! thank you very much!
|
08-26-2006, 09:03 AM | #13 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I agree to a certain extent
I do agree with child... Maybe tolken didn't know why gandalf choose bilbo... If no one else knows then how do we know that he even knew himself?
|
|
|