Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
07-22-2005, 09:58 PM | #1 |
Wight
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mordor
Posts: 150
|
Shadows of former glory
The LOTR is obviously a much more toned down (in terms of power & might) version of the elder days of the Silmarillion. I've found some very interesting similarities.
For instance, in the elder days (1st age), Luthien & Beren were confronted by Carcaroth & Luthien was somehow posessed by some native strength & commanded the beast to slumber. And then In the 3rd age, Sam subconsciously murmured some elvish lingo that caused the lady's star-glass to burst into bright white fire damaging Shelob, and like Luthien, he used it to break the will of watchers of Cirith Ungol. Talk about identical situations. Another example is the silmarils making a semi comeback. As I said I the Luthien vs Galadriel thread (& Tolkien), Galadriel was somewhat the equal of Feanor so it was totally fitting that she alone of the elves was able to replicate the light of the Silmarills through creating the star-glass which btw did not lose its "magic light" (though its power was subdued at the heart of the realm of Sauron) even after her ring lost its powers. And then of course you have Arwen described as having the likeness of Luthien, although she seemed more regretful & bitter in her death bed. And let's not forget the eagles.
__________________
I am Annatar, the Lord of Gifts. |
07-23-2005, 01:29 AM | #2 |
Animated Skeleton
|
Hmm... The light of the star Earendil is that from the Silmaril upon his brow. So one can wonder if the trapped light is the 'Galadriel version' of a Silmaril. Though one must agree that the phial given to Frodo is a very diminished version of the Silmaril.
"We are in the same story after all. The tales never end. Only people come and go as thier parts are over." Did she have the ability to make the Silmarils herself? I think not. Feanor was unique.Otherwise the two trees themselves would have been regrown. As to LoTR being a smaller version of the Silm, I don't think so. Silm is a grand tale of 500years. There are many parts in it. Tolkien threw everything at it. There are boind to be cases which seem similar. LoTR is a totally different style of work. It covers just one year. Instances seem similar to Silm because there are so many things happening in Silm. As to the Eagles, they are the descendents of Thorondor and the eldest ones. Tolkien could not obviously leave them out of his tale, could not kill them all out at the end of the first age. Questions will pop up if they are absent. As to Arwen, all lines from the first age continued. So it would be natural to marry them again.
__________________
Half-brother in blood, full brother in heart will I be. Thou shalt lead and I will follow. May no new grief divide us. |
07-23-2005, 07:52 AM | #3 | ||||
Shade of Carn Dűm
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ad finem itineris
Posts: 384
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
One reason why LotR is less grand than Silm is because Tolkien was trying to show how we're declining through the Ages.
__________________
Enyale cuilenya, ú-enyale mandenya. |
||||
07-23-2005, 09:02 AM | #4 | |
Cryptic Aura
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 5,996
|
Quote:
There are many readers who would, I suspect, say that LotR is the more powerful piece of writing, the more enchanting form of the perilous realm. Because for many The Silm reads more like an encyclopedia than modern narrative, it is a whiter shade of pale. I suppose, though, that this is just another version of those "who is the most powerful wack and slasher" in Middle-earth threads. Vive la difference. |
|
07-23-2005, 04:41 PM | #5 |
Shade of Carn Dűm
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Halls of Mandos
Posts: 332
|
On the one hand, Silmarillion will always be "greater" than LOTR, because everything is bigger, more powerful, one might say more perilous.
But on the other hand, I would say that LOTR is "greater" than the Silmarillion. It has one key ingredient missing in the History of the Silmarils: hobbits. Let's face it: without hobbits LOTR really is just a weaker version of the Silmarillion. But it's not the Wise and the Great that begin and complete the Quest of the Ring (though they certainly give it aid): it's Frodo and Samwise. The reader cannot identify with Feanor, Maedhros, Fingon, Luthien, Beren, Turin, etc., but he can identify with Bilbo, Frodo, Sam, Merry, Pippin. Someone else can continue this argument, I'm certain; I'll leave it for the time being.
__________________
"If you're referring to the incident with the dragon, I was barely involved. All I did was give your uncle a little nudge out of the door." THE HOBBIT - IT'S COMING |
07-23-2005, 08:15 PM | #6 | |
Dead Serious
|
Quote:
I doubt if Galadriel was the ONLY one who could have put the light of Earendil's star in a vial, she is simply the only one we know who actually does it. No mention is made of it being a spectacular feat- for all we know, Cirdan, Elrond, or old Thranduil could have done it- had they thought to. After all, Galadriel is never associated with great feats of making, as Celebrimbor and Feanor were, in spite of having been the Queen of Eregion according to one history. No, her genius was in seeing a reason to do so, rather than any special power, I would say. But in general, the Lord of the Rings naturally imitates the Silmarillion at times. Both were written by the same author, and both were epics of great length. Some similarities are to be expected.
__________________
I prefer history, true or feigned.
|
|
07-24-2005, 01:23 AM | #7 |
Illustrious Ulair
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In the home of lost causes, and forsaken beliefs, and unpopular names,and impossible loyalties
Posts: 4,240
|
Fractals again.
|
07-26-2005, 11:20 PM | #8 | |||
Wight
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mordor
Posts: 150
|
Quote:
"...and slowly the ship slipped away down the long grey firth; and the light of the glass of Galadriel that Frodo bore glimmered and was lost." The Return of the King VI 9 The Grey Havens Quote:
Quote:
__________________
I am Annatar, the Lord of Gifts. Last edited by Gorthaur the Cruel; 07-26-2005 at 11:23 PM. |
|||
|
|