Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
11-21-2004, 06:46 PM | #1 | ||||
Illusionary Holbytla
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 7,547
|
My Precious?
Recently, I was rereading The Hobbit, or, more specifically, the "Riddles in the Dark" chapter, when this occurred to me. Obviously, the Ring had long since consumed Gollum's mind, and it was the most valuable and precious thing he had. The question is, what is really Gollum's precious? Let me explain:
The first time we hear Gollum speak is immediately after he is described to us: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Firefoot; 11-22-2004 at 06:13 AM. |
||||
11-21-2004, 09:50 PM | #2 | |||
Drummer in the Deep
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Next Sunday A.D.
Posts: 2,145
|
The transition from Gollum himself being called Precious, to the Precious being called Precious was apparently a transition made when Tolkien rewrote the hobbit to the true version of Bilbo's story.
I have with me an unedited copy of "Riddles in the Dark", and after "bless us and splash us!" follows this: Quote:
This change in writings was probably brought about to make the transition from Gollum/Precious to Ring/Precious more credible. Quote:
And then those nasty hobbits wouldn't let him have himself back. Like they stole his soul, or something. Quote:
(I hope this hasn't been too rambled...my brain's a little rusty... )
__________________
But all the while I sit and think of times there were before
I listen for returning feet and voices at the door |
|||
11-22-2004, 10:10 AM | #3 | |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The World That Never Was
Posts: 1,232
|
Quote:
Smeagol, on the other hand, was the initial personality, and so wasn't "lost". So came the Smeagol/Gollum arguments. The Smeagol personality was able to voice his opinion (heh) because of the "loss" of strength in the Gollum personality. Unless I'm much mistaken, Gollum and Smeagol didn't argue much (or at all) in The Hobbit, when the Ring was surmised to be safe in his/their hut. Abedithon le, ~ Saphy ~
__________________
The Hitchhiking Ghost |
|
11-22-2004, 05:05 PM | #4 |
Illusionary Holbytla
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 7,547
|
Interesting comments on Gollum/Ring vs. Smeagol. So if the Gollum side associates himself with the Ring, how does the Smeagol side see it? Looking back at the arguments his two sides have with each other, the Gollum side is always for taking back the Ring, while the Smeagol side stands for holding up to his promise and not harming Frodo. This may be because while the Gollum side feels he is lost, the Smeagol side is now free, from the Ring if not from Gollum. Gollum is certainly one of the most complex characters.
So, in light of these opinions, which side of Gollum's personality is making the promise to serve the master of the Precious? Or is it both? Would his motives be different depending on which side it is? My guess is, it is the Smeagol side that is promising to be good, and the Gollum side goes along with it to get the rope off, not intending to keep the promise. The Gollum side would be the one that wanted to swear on the Precious rather than by it, as a way of trying to achieve possession of his Precious and in turn the part of his soul that he has 'lost.' |
11-22-2004, 10:32 PM | #5 | ||
Drummer in the Deep
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Next Sunday A.D.
Posts: 2,145
|
Here we get a little bit more into the "He hates and loves the Ring, as he hates and loves himself" bit.
I can almost see Gollum as the Ring come to flesh. He's devious, manipulative, and very cunning, while Smeagol is almost childish and naive. Smeagol hates the Ring and Gollum because they almost "make" him do what he didn't/doesn't want to do. Maybe he's too childish to realize that it's his choice too, but giving in has become an age-old habit. While Gollum hates Smeagol for holding him back. Quote:
Is Gandalf referring to Gollum just because Frodo would know him by that name, or is he naming the evil half? Quote:
__________________
But all the while I sit and think of times there were before
I listen for returning feet and voices at the door |
||
11-25-2004, 10:23 AM | #6 |
Auspicious Wraith
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 4,859
|
Gollum spoke like that because he was a severely muddled individual.
__________________
Los Ingobernables de Harlond |
11-25-2004, 10:43 AM | #7 | |
Illusionary Holbytla
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 7,547
|
Quote:
So I do not think you can say Gollum's speech patterns came only from his muddled-ness (though, I grant that it was a large factor), which was a direct result of his possession of the Ring. It is more complex than that. Gollum/Smeagol Re: It occurred to me that the contexts in which the two personalities use the term "precious" are very different. Gollum uses it referring to himself and having lost it - very selfish terms, focused only on himself. Smeagol solely uses the precious to refer to the Ring, and in these cases it is capitolized. It is then simply another name for the Ring, which though it grew from Gollum's usage of the word, it has very separate connotations indeed. |
|
11-25-2004, 11:32 AM | #8 |
Auspicious Wraith
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 4,859
|
I am not convinced that it is more complex than that. I don't think Gollum put too much thought into how to properly use the word precious. He just bandied it about rather carelessly, which is precisely the kind of thing that you do if you're having quite tremendous personal and psychological problems as Gollum clearly was.
__________________
Los Ingobernables de Harlond |
11-28-2004, 09:53 AM | #9 |
Wight
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: in my hobbit hole
Posts: 204
|
Ok here's what I think...even if it is a little mixed up. Isildur called the ring precious. Or it was precious truly more like it. I think when Gollum acquired the ring the essence of Isildur sort of stuck to the ring and Gollum started calling the ring his precious. Then as the ring started to consume his mind, the precious started consuming him and becoming a part of him. The part of him that he called my precious when he was talking to himself. If you remeber Smeagol used pet names while he was still a Hobbit. Give that to us Deagol my love. So i guess Gollum just really likes pet names. I don't really know. That's just always been the way I've percieved it.
__________________
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve!"-Bilbo Baggins |
11-28-2004, 02:19 PM | #10 |
Hidden Spirit
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,424
|
It didn't have anything to do with Isildur.
__________________
What's a burrahobbit got to do with my pocket, anyways? |
11-29-2004, 10:34 AM | #11 | |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The World That Never Was
Posts: 1,232
|
Ah, the return of the scarily short responses. o.O Way to go, Eomer and burra.
Quote:
I do think there may be a difference between "precious" and "The Precious", however. The Precious does seem to be in reference to the Ring. "precious", uncapitalized, seems to just be the habitual term Gollum/Smeagol uses when talking to others or himself. Perhaps it's like an "affectionate" (heh) moniker, such as "dear" or something to that effect. And, as I stated above, Gollum's use of it could be purely subconscious. ~ Saphy ~
__________________
The Hitchhiking Ghost |
|
|
|