Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
05-22-2004, 10:24 PM | #1 | ||||||
Wight
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Ephel Duath
Posts: 115
|
"Morgoth's Ring" or Sauron's Ring?
I have a theory about how the Rings of Power actually worked. Admittedly, this is going to be rather speculative, but as far as I know, doesn't contradict anything Tolkien wrote, and may help to explain a few things.
To begin with, the Valar (and to a lesser extent, the Maiar) dispersed much of their original power into the substance of Middle-earth. This was particularly true of Melkor (a.k.a Morgoth), who early on had fought the other 14 Valar combined to a standstill. Quote:
To a lesser extent, the same applies to the other Valar as well: Quote:
Tolkien makes it clear that Morgoth's dispersed power is still there: Quote:
So as to the individual Rings: The One Ring uses Melkor's dispersed power. It was made by Sauron, Morgoth's servent, and its will (which is imposed on anyone who tries to use it) is to dominate the entire world (wasn't that why Melkor dispersed his power in the first place?) Also, it is much more powerful than any of the other rings--because Melkor dispersed more of his power into the world than any other Vala. The Three Rings; Vilya, Narya, and Nenya; use the dispersed power of the Vala Manwë, Aulë, and Ulmo; respectively. Quote:
The Seven Rings don't seem to be connected to a particular Vala, but rather to Gold, as according to the dwarves, they multiply wealth. Unfortunately,... Quote:
Quote:
So, let's see how this theory addresses some questions: Was it Sauron's will in the Ring? Yes and no. Sauron made the One Ring, and put most of his own power into it. And he created it to gain domination over the world. But the corruption that the Ring works on it bearer is also a consequence of the Ring being a focal point for Morgoth's dispersed will, which is far stronger than Sauron's. For this reason, no one, not even the Valar, could make the Ring anything but an instrument of evil (since this would require Melkor's reformation, which was proved to be beyond their abilities). In this view, by creating the Ring, and thus linking his power to Morgoth's, Sauron makes himself irrevocably evil and Morgoth's proxy in Arda. This also explains why Elrond says that the Valar would not permit the Ring to be carried into the West: letting the Ring into Valinor would be tantamount to letting Morgoth in. Also, this answers the question: if making magic rings was a surefire way to increase one's power, why didn't Morgoth make one? Well, since it was his power to begin with that the One Ring ended up using, what would be the point? He dispersed his power consciously in an attempt to gain control over the physical world. Finally, a minor point: Saruman was the wizard chosen by Aulë, so the fact that Cirdan gave the ring which made use of Aulë's power to Gandalf instead upset Saruman in part because being Aulë's choice among the Istari made him (in his mind anyway) the rightful bearer. This theory is probably unprovable from anything Tolkien wrote, but I would be interested in hearing your views and whether it is contradicted by anything written. |
||||||
05-22-2004, 11:31 PM | #2 | ||
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Where you want me to be
Posts: 1,036
|
This is a very interesting topic, Angry Hill Troll.
You said- Quote:
Quote:
My personal opinion is that Morgoth's will was not prevalent in Sauron's One Ring, but that Sauron followed his former masters lead in being evil and gathering evil creatures to him. Remember, Sauron only wanted to rule the people of Middle-Earth while Morgoth coveted the whole of Arda for his own. Unfortunately, I only own a copy of LoTR so I can't use any quotes to back up my arguments, like you have done to good effect. This is a very interesting topic though and is subject to opinion (so either of us could be right ), so congratulations on thinking up a thought-provocative topic, which is certainly going to cause a lot of debate.
__________________
Et Eärello Endorenna utúlien. Sinome maruvan ar Hildinyar tenn' Ambar-metta. Last edited by Fingolfin II; 05-23-2004 at 02:22 AM. Reason: Spelling |
||
05-23-2004, 12:19 AM | #3 | |
Wight
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Ephel Duath
Posts: 115
|
Fingolfin you remember correctly about Sauron's desire to dominate the creatures of Arda. The quote is from the same section of Morgoth's Ring as most of the ones in my first post.
Quote:
One characteristic of Tolkien's universe seems to be that power always has to come from somewhere (ultimately from Eru's creation of the Ainur and of Eä), and that once the power has been destroyed (or more accurately, dispersed) it's very hard to get back. For this reason Arda ends up being 'entropic' in the sense that in each age the power (of both good and evil) is less than in the previous one. An example is following the destruction of the Trees and the theft of the Silmarils, there doesn't seem to be the option of Yavanna just growing two more Trees (she did it once, after all) and Fëanor making a new set of Silmarils, and everybody being happy again. So partly for this reason it seems somewhat strange that Sauron would be able to increase his power by making the Ring, without the 'extra' power coming from some other source (such as Morgoth's dispersed power). |
|
05-23-2004, 02:36 AM | #4 | |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Where you want me to be
Posts: 1,036
|
Quote:
Sauron having the Orcs and Easterlings under his sway is very interesting and seems to support your theory about him gathering sourcing some of his own power from Morgoth's dispersed power- why else would they go to him? I suppose you can argue against that, that they would go over to his side because of fear of him, or maybe because he bribed them (most likely it's a mixture of both). However I think that Morgoth's will is definately prevalent in this matter, as 'the bonds he laid on Sauron' (somewhere in the Silmarillion/Akallabeth) were very strong, so Sauron turned once more to evil and the 'Dark' power he most likely learnt from Morgoth. So in a way, I believe that Sauron's power is coming indirectly from what he has learnt of Morgoth, rather than from Arda itself, since Melkor is outside of it in the Void.
__________________
Et Eärello Endorenna utúlien. Sinome maruvan ar Hildinyar tenn' Ambar-metta. |
|
05-29-2004, 11:01 PM | #5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Angry Hill Troll
You make some very interesting views. I also think that the will of Morgoth was in the One Ring, or at least in the making of it. The will of Morgoth was in all evil things, so therefore it must be in the One Ring. Sauron was indeed a Maia however, and had power over many earthly things, so I wouldn't put it past his powers. He was the dominator of wills, and the One Ring was his guide in doing so. Concerning the three Elven rings, I'm not sure where I stand. Perhaps they were a part of the Valar but perhaps you have just run into a timely coincidence (which either way is very fun in imagining). If you look at it from a simple standpoint though, it seems you would be correct. Manwe, lord of the air, would indeed have a part in all things of the air, would he not? So how could he NOT have a part in the elven ring wrought with the mere power of the element of the air? It would therefore make Manwe not the ruler of the skies if he could not (or did not) govern all things that were related to the sky. Aule isn't necessarily the ruler of fire however, not specifically anyway, but it still makes sense. Aule was a master of crafts if I'm not mistaken, but therefore he would indeed have mastery over fire. Concering the quote from Elrond saying that the Valar would not let the ring come into the west doesn't justify hardly anything, for the Blessed Relm was to be free from all evil, whether it be an orc or the One Ring makes little difference. It was the fact that that the ring was evil (in my opinion) and wrought from evil. However you claim that Sauron increased his power so to speak with the making of the ring. It seems not so to me. To me it seems as if the ring was more a weapon than a 'buffer' so to speak. Morgoth didn't need to make a ring because no one could withstand him anyway. And Sauron had great power, and was not made to perish on the earth for he was a Maia which no man could vanquish completely. He could however, dominate people's will, and thus he did with the One Ring. It doesn't seem to me it made him physically stronger. The last conflict between your theories that I seem to catch is that Sauron's ring was more powerful than any of the Elven rings, so for this to happen the ring would have to have come from Morgoth somehow (because only Morgoth was stronger than the Valar) and it's obvious that Sauron wasn't stronger than the Valar, or even mightiest of the Maia (as proven when he was overtaken by Huan). But now the problem in this is that the Elves made the rings, not Sauron, and it seems very unlikely that somehow Morgoth could have possesed the minds or hands of Celebrimbor (the maker of the three) and it is said that Sauron never possesed the three rings, which leads me to think upon these rings as powers of the Valar, as you have said before. So here we are back at the beginning of the delima, but it proved a fun ride nonetheless and I would love to write more about it in posts to come |
06-04-2004, 01:28 PM | #6 |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: commonplace city
Posts: 518
|
Its seems to me a question at this point would be to ask:
After his physical form being destroyed at Numenor, how much of the power of the Ring did Sauron have to "use" to remain a potent threat to the material world? Or, put another way, was there any sigificant change in the Ring itself pre and post destruction of Sauron's physical body? Or was the "usage" of the power changed? IMO, the more Morgoth inserted his power into his "ring", the less powerfull his physicall entity became. But the power of his ring was still there, at least mainly there. The breaking of Beleriand would have (mabye?) decreased his power. If Morgoth was not captured and cast out into the void, the influence of his power in Arda could still be tapped, or manipulated by him. Sauron, after the sinking of Numenor, vitally depended on the Ring's power to assert influence in ME. So, Sauron's Ring by the 2nd age appears to be the more powerfull. But only (again IMO) because of the dire need of it by Sauron. The loss of his Ring demonstrates this to me. |
06-07-2004, 07:07 AM | #7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Question 1) What happened to the rings that were given to the Dwarves that weren't consumed by dragon fire?
Question 2) How did the One Ring work in connection with the 3 Elvish rings? If Sauron never had a part in the creation of the 3 Elvish rings, how would he have gained dominion over them when he recovered the One Ring (or is this just an incorrect assumption)? |
06-26-2004, 06:55 PM | #8 |
Animated Skeleton
|
All the Seven and the Nine were identical in the beginning, or at least very similar. They were not called 'the Seven' and 'the Nine' in the beginning; that was only after Sauron had dealt seven of them out to Dwarves and nine to Men. But Sauron, before he dealt them out, perhaps modified the seven that were given to Dwarves to suit Dwarves specifically, and likewise the other nine to suit Men. The Three were also similar to the other 16 in the beginning but they were more powerful, and the other 16 were tainted (this perhaps implies that they were modified) later by Sauron, unlike the Three.
senser81: The Three were still partly made by Sauron's knowledge since he had teached the Mírdain, therefore they still contained his secret 'code'. |
06-27-2004, 09:13 AM | #9 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
|
The Rings were all equally made for being used by Elves, but they were different from the beginning. In the unfinshed tales we can read about the fall of Eregion and when Sauron captured Celbrimbor in the house uf the Gwaith i Mirdain, Celebrimbor revealed easilie were the nine were stored and under torture he gave away the hidding places of the seven, but about the three he said nothing. That does mean that Rings were already grouped in the same numbers before Sauron toke them.
Respectfully Findegil |
06-27-2004, 03:41 PM | #10 |
Animated Skeleton
|
Findegil:
It seems that you are right, unless the text, being written after the war, just speaks of the Nine and the Seven in that way, even though they were not grouped at that time yet. Then Sauron must have instructed the Mírdain to split them up like this, and probably make seven Rings with certain characteristics and nine with certain characteristics different to those of the seven, even though all 16 were going to be used by Elves (or so the Mírdain thought). Or, the Mírdain thought that nine Rings were going to be used in a certain way and/or a certain type of Elves, and seven in another way and/or by another type of Elves and made the Rings according to this. |
|
|