Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
01-16-2004, 10:10 AM | #1 |
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In the warm bosom of a Warg
Posts: 378
|
Why didn't Sam have a problem giving The Ring back to Frodo?
It's a question I've often wondered about: when samwise returns The Ring to Frodo at Cirith Ungol why doesn't he have trouble doing it? Surely even in such a short time as Sam had held The Ring it would have had some sway over him, being so close to Barad Dur.
I think there are two possibilities: firstly, Sam was not affected by The Ring's evil, that he had a higher resistance (supported by Sam being the most resistent hobbit in the Old Forest) or suchlike. The second possibility I see is that Sam realised that it was Frodo's task to destroy The Ring, and thus it must be returned to him. What do you guys think? I'd appreciate criticisms or agreement with my own suggestions or indeed new ones.
__________________
-- Well, I'm back. |
01-16-2004, 11:49 AM | #2 | |
Animated Skeleton
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Paris Herself
Posts: 28
|
Quote:
~Sparrow
__________________
Were kisses all the joys in bed, One woman would another wed. -Bill Shakespeare |
|
01-16-2004, 02:45 PM | #3 | ||
Spectre of Decay
|
It seems to me that the Ring is attempting a new line of attack with Sam. Earlier it has tried to tempt him with a vision of power, but this has failed in the face of his humility and devotion:
Quote:
Quote:
<font size=1 color=339966>[ 3:48 PM January 16, 2004: Message edited by: The Squatter of Amon Rûdh ]
__________________
Man kenuva métim' andúne? |
||
01-16-2004, 06:49 PM | #4 |
Corpus Cacophonous
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A green and pleasant land
Posts: 8,390
|
Thank you for providing the full quote, Sparrow. I was going to look it up myself, but you have saved me the bother. [img]smilies/wink.gif[/img]
The Ring has had very little time to work on Sam. As Squatter has pointed out, it does seek to corrupt him while he bears it. And so it does have an influence on him, albeit one which he is able to resist. But, since he has borne it for such a short while, its hold over him is not strong enough to prevent him returning it to Frodo relatively easily. But, as Squatter has also pointed out, there is a measure of resistance here. I do not see Sam's offer to share the burden as solely indicative of his loyalty and love for Frodo. Rather, I see it as the seed of a notion in his head, brought on by the Ring's influence, that he should be able to keep it for himself. It is playing on his loyalty and love for Frodo to bring about a situation whereby it will be in a position to work on him further. So, while Sam does give the Ring up with relative ease, I do not believe that he does so completely freely. (Incidentally, I thought that this was portrayed very well in the film by Sean Astin - the expression on his face when Frodo demands the Ring back betrays a momentary reluctance to give it up.) Of course, being a Hobbit, Sam has a stronger resistance to the Ring than most. Boromir, for example, succumbs to its wiles without ever having touched it. But I do not believe that Sam would have been able to resist it had he borne it for a prolonged period. Certainly, vital though his contribution to the Quest was, I do not believe that he would have been able to carry it as long as Frodo did without succumbing to it. Frodo was "meant" to be the Ringbearer, because he was the only one who could have resisted it as long as he did.
__________________
Do you mind? I'm busy doing the fishstick. It's a very delicate state of mind! |
01-17-2004, 03:05 AM | #5 |
Illustrious Ulair
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In the home of lost causes, and forsaken beliefs, and unpopular names,and impossible loyalties
Posts: 4,240
|
But Tolkien may have had in mind the instruction, 'Bear ye one another's burdens'. This is something Charles Williams placed a great deal of emphasis on, with his idea of co-inherence, that not only is it right, but also quite possible, to take another person's sufferings onto oneself, in order to free up the other person. It is possible the point Tolkien is making is that Sam honestly wanted to take on the burden of carrying the Ring, or at least to share it, but that Frodo, at that point was so closed off, so obsessed with the Ring that he could not share it. The Ring is a closed circle, there is no opening, nothing can be let in. Frodo also becomes completely closed off. Even if Sam's offer was completely altruistic, Frodo could not have seen it in that way.
Is Sam's love for Frodo stronger than his desire for the Ring? This is my feeling. He is freed by his love from desire for what the Ring could offer him. Its interesting that the only thing the Ring can symbolise for him - Samwise the Strong - is so ridiculous even he can't take it seriously. I don't think he's 'clever' enough to come up with a serious temptation, something which would hook him. Maybe the Ring feels he's not suitable material, & stops trying with him. I wonder whether Sam hadn't already overcome any temptation the Ring could offer way back in Lorien, when he chose not to go back home & stay with Frodo. |
01-17-2004, 07:22 AM | #6 | |
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In the warm bosom of a Warg
Posts: 378
|
Davem, that's a really interesting idea you brought up about Sam overcoming The Ring's temptation in Lothlorien:
Quote:
Saucepan Man, on a little aside I felt the scene in Cirith Ungol would have been fine had that deep heartbeat not been present, you know the one which is spoken about in the FoTR EE bonus dvds as being a kind of theme tune for The Ring. That, of course, is because I always read the text that Sam wasn't being tempted, but that, I guess, is almost completely subjective. I in fact think the films are great, and hope to contribute to the defense of PJ in the trial on ME Mirth.
__________________
-- Well, I'm back. |
|
01-17-2004, 12:36 PM | #7 |
Pile O'Bones
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Rivendell, cork
Posts: 20
|
I think that it shows how pure Sam's intent was. That his only ambition was to help his friend. Plus the fact that he didn't have it for more than a couple of hours.
__________________
lady Alakmundoiel of rivendell |
01-17-2004, 02:57 PM | #8 |
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: 315, CNY Boys and girls.
Posts: 405
|
I always had thought of Sam's thoughts of the Ring and his subsequent use of it were a lot more like Bilbo's in The Hobbit, the chapter The Tower of Cirith Ungol has him thinking fast and reacting, and using it as a Magic Ring, thinking back to how Bilbo had once used it to sneak by, and using it and his 'Sting' in conjunction. There was one quote; "he put it back on without any clear reason for doing it," which shows that it had him doing things habitually instead of wilfully, but then he took it off he thought because it was foggy to see with, but the author mentioned maybe he had a slight inkling or premonition that he had to. I just don't think Sam ever really thought of the One Ring as more than a magic ring, regardless of how serious all the talk was about it - he knew that they needed to toss a magic ring into a fiery pit in Mt. Doom, and that it was a burden on his master, and that was all he thought particularly about it; like mentioned above, the Ring tried, but it didn't get a chance.
__________________
"I come from yonder...Have you seen Baggins? Baggins has left, he is coming. He is not far away. I wish to find him. If he passes will you tell me? I will come back with gold." - Khamul the Easterling |
01-17-2004, 10:25 PM | #9 |
Animated Skeleton
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Angband (a small region in northern BC)
Posts: 50
|
One could give Sam the benefit of the doubt, as it were, and say that perhaps his concern and love for his master was stronger than the urge to submit his will to the power of the One Ring...
Then again, maybe not. [img]smilies/tongue.gif[/img]
__________________
"Candy: tastes like chicken, if chicken was a candy." |
01-20-2004, 08:43 PM | #10 | ||
Animated Skeleton
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: U.S.A., though I'd prefer the Shire
Posts: 45
|
Quote:
Quote:
I think that the ring's only way to get at Sam would be the love of his master, and given the Frodo's situation, Sam could hardly walk off , and leave...
__________________
"But after coming all that way I don't want to give up yet. It's not like me, somehow, if you understand." |
||
01-21-2004, 06:12 AM | #11 | |
Haunting Spirit
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Wotton-on-the-Edge
Posts: 86
|
Quote:
Maybe it is this sort of love for everyhting that is good in life is what foxes the ring, considering that it is an object created out of evil?
__________________
The pain of war cannot exceed the woe of aftermath, The drums will shake the castle wall, the ring wraiths ride in black, Ride on. |
|
01-22-2004, 03:10 PM | #12 |
Wight
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Touring Minas Tirith with Gimli and Legolas
Posts: 107
|
Sam had not carried the ring for long enough, it had yet to assert itself over him.
Secondly, Sam was made rather naive in a very nice way. He all the while had accepted the fact that his master Frodo was the ring bearer and he was only taking care of it when Frodo could not himself. The ring was never passed to him so he had no problem giving it back. The quote reminds us that he does not really give it back but offers it and also offers to continue carrying it. He gives a choice to Frodo. The ring then sees a chance to regain control, for it never had control over SAM and forces Frodo to lunge out and grab it back. I personally believe that Sam was made of sturner stuff and would prove a difficult target for the ring.
__________________
I can't believe I have not watched the return of the king yet. |
|
|