Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
06-22-2018, 09:20 PM | #1 | |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
|
The North Kingdom and the Dúnedain
This is the first draft of the chapter The North Kingdom and the Dúnedain.
This chapter is a thoroughly mixed bag of sources, and so there is no base text. Because of this, I have marked every instance of any text used, so as to be easy to follow. The markings are: FY-HL-xx for all the headlines for the Fading Years. NKD-SL-xx for all expansions and changes to the narrative. Some conventions of my writing: Bold Text = source information, comments and remarks {example} = text that should be deleted [example] = normalized text, normally only used for general changes, as well as changes which are a part of replacement that is not grammatical. Underlined Text = text changed for grammatical reasons in the process of combining and inserting and removing. <source example> = additions with source information ...... = This section of the paragraph is unchanged from the source. Quote:
NKD-SL-01: We start off with the claim of Arvedui over the crown of Gondor. This addition ends in the middle of a sentence, and we continue from the second part of that sentence in NKD-SL-05. NKD-SL-02/04: Here we may discuss something about the structure of the Appendices. As they are written, they are meant to be written by Hobbits, and so the authorial voice sometimes creeps in, especially in these footnotes. Since we are posing this work as the Translations from the Elvish done by Bilbo, I think we can leave these references to the Hobbit authors in, but I figured I would mark them just in case there is some discussion to be had. NKD-SL-03: Here we turn to the Arnor narrative with the fall of Arthedain and the death of Arvedui. NKD-SL-05: Here we return to the sentence we left off at in the Gondor narrative, and tell of the defeat of the Witch-King. NKD-SL-06: Here we return to the Arnor narrative, and introduce the Dunedain as rangers. NKD-SL-07: I pulled this paragraph from later on in this part of Appendix A because I think it fits best here as a sort of discussion of the Dunedain in general. This is a very straightforward chapter, which is the calm before the storm that is the following chapter.... |
|
06-23-2018, 10:11 AM | #2 | ||
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,720
|
Yes, this chapter is straight forward, and you are right The Heirs of Elendil has nothing to add here. So in the event I have only three points that are to be discussed:
NKD-SL-05: I find that starting a lookback with 'At last' not very fitting. I would remove a bit more and start with the text given below. The last paragraph of NKD-SL-03 seems a bit out of place. The war is not yet over, so the survival of the Hobbits would be a kind of fortelling. I would rather move that paragraph. What about this: Quote:
Quote:
Findegil Last edited by Findegil; 06-23-2018 at 11:00 AM. |
||
06-23-2018, 11:37 AM | #3 |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
|
NKD-SL-05/06b: Agreed, it flows better this way.
I did not leave this out intentionally, the copy of the Appendices I was using does not have the footnotes in it, so I must have missed this one. Thank you for catching it! I will add it into my draft. Last edited by ArcusCalion; 06-23-2018 at 11:43 AM. |
07-14-2018, 12:14 AM | #4 | |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
|
I have tried to add in the text of the Prologue to the work. Here I have placed Of the Ordering of the Shire. To do this in the best way, I had to do some mild restructuring.
I took out NKD-SL-06, so that the chapter proceeds as if it was removed. Then, after it finishes, I added in a subheading (FY-HL-07.5): Of the Ordering of the Shire: Quote:
NKD-SL-06.1: relevant bit of Concerning Hobbits given. NKD-SL-06.2: relevant bit of Concerning Hobbits given. NKD-SL-06.3: The main text Of the Ordering of the Shire. NKD-SL-06.4: book reference removed. NKD-SL-06.5: Since we are placing this here, it has not been 1000 years since the kings, so I changed it to work. NKD-SL-06.6: This needs to be changed since it is a reference to LotR. |
|
07-15-2018, 07:54 AM | #5 | |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,720
|
NKD-SL-06b: I agree to the movement, but we have to take care about the editing marks. In its original palce this was the 1. paragraph of a longer part of Appendix A and it was already marked with a 'b' as being the second variant under discussion. I propose to name the shortened add in the original place NKD-SL-06c and name the paragraph about the hobbits used here NKD-SL-06.05.
NKD-SL-06.1: I agree to the insert and to the gramatical change, but at least evnen if 'Shire' should have a kapital 'S' the article 'the' shouldn't have a capital 'T'. But I like to propose a different edit: Quote:
I as well agree to the rest of the changes. Respectfully Findegil |
|
07-15-2018, 10:05 AM | #6 |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
|
Agreed
|
01-10-2019, 05:53 PM | #7 | |||||||||||
Wight
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 121
|
I like the placement of the LOTR prologue material in this chapter.
1) I have a concern about some of the instances where the authorial voice creeps in, namely (as noted by Arcus) "That law was made in Númenor NKD-SL-02 (as we have learned from the King) when Tar-Aldarion..." and "That was guarded by the Elves, and NKD-SL-04 though we never knew it, it remained there". There is another one Arcus missed: "The scepter was the chief mark of royalty in Númenor, the King tells us..." I'm pretty sure the words "us" and "we" refer to the hobbits, but according to Fin in the topic on the Glorfindel chapter, we are not aiming for this to be an in-universe text: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
There is a missing apostrophe at the end of the third paragraph. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
In the document I got from Arcus "scepter" is used but in the Lord of the Rings, it is spelled "sceptre". 4) One last comment: Quote:
|
|||||||||||
01-10-2019, 11:34 PM | #8 |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
|
1) I think this is a large issue we need to discuss for the whole of the project. The authorial voice creeps in in the final chapter as well very prominently, and the decision made here affects it. Personally, I think gandalf's logic is sound, but I would love to hear Fin's thoughts.
2) I know we already used it, but it is being used here as evidence to prove a point, and since it is a small repetition, I do not think we need to remove it here. Some repetition of small bits like this isn't bad. 3) Thank you for catching these! As for sceptre/scepter it's just the British vs American spelling. My documents are all in American spelling, but Tolkien's are in British. A minor English oddity. 4) I agree to this, nice catch! Last edited by ArcusCalion; 01-10-2019 at 11:41 PM. |
01-11-2019, 02:52 PM | #9 |
Wight
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 121
|
2) All right, I wasn't sure if this was intentionally kept in or accidentally missed. I'm OK with keeping it.
3) Ahh Ok, I thought I had seen it both ways (scepter and sceptre), I didn't know about the American/British difference. |
01-12-2019, 09:27 AM | #10 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,720
|
1) The problem with this special inunivers authorial inserts is that they give a clear evidence that the text was written by a Hobbit of the late Thrid Age. But that our work does not claim to have an inunivers equivalent as a hohle or in all its parts, does at least in my opinion not mean that the divers inunivers authors shouldn’t came through here or there. I think the question is rather if they are not out of place in the new sorounding in which we put these texts.
2) I agree that we left these passage intentionaly stand. And I think that this is specially okay, since we did not even use a full sentence. 3) Thanks for finding these. I think we should use the British ‘sceptre’ since Tolkien is an English author. 4) Agreed. We should name that change NKD-SL-06.35. Respectfully Findegil |
01-13-2019, 01:06 PM | #11 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,720
|
Coming back to the first typo gandalf85 found: The missing apostroph at the end of the thrid paragraph is intentional. The direct speach continues in the fourth paragraph and in such cases in we find always only a apostroph at the begining of the next but none at the end of the paragraph.
Respectfully Findegil |
01-14-2019, 08:59 PM | #12 |
Wight
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 121
|
Ahh, OK, that rule regarding quotes makes sense. Regarding the authorial voice, Fin, do you come down on the side of removing them from this chapter? I think they feel out of place; as you mentioned, the use of "us" and "we" which clearly show the text was written by a hobbit feels inconsistent with the other chapters (at least the ones I have read so far).
Last edited by gandalf85; 01-14-2019 at 09:05 PM. |
01-15-2019, 03:15 PM | #13 | |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,720
|
NKD-SL-02b and NKD-SL-08.51: Yes, I would remove these.
NKD-SL-04b: Here I am not sure if removal is the right choice. It might be in information worth giving that not many people did know that the Palantir of the Tower Hills still existed. So I would change that passage: Quote:
Findegil |
|
01-15-2019, 06:24 PM | #14 |
Wight
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 121
|
I like the idea of making the locations of the palantiri only known to a few, but I suggest a slight change to make it sound better to my ears:
... That was guarded by the Elves, and though NKD-SL-04d{we never}[very few] knew it, it remained there, until Círdan put it aboard Elrond’s ship when he left. ... |
01-16-2019, 01:29 PM | #15 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,720
|
NKD-SL-04d: Agreed.
Respectfully Findegil |
|
|