![]() |
![]() |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
![]() |
#1 |
Illustrious Ulair
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In the home of lost causes, and forsaken beliefs, and unpopular names,and impossible loyalties
Posts: 4,240
![]() ![]() |
![]()
In one of the letters Tolkien refers to someone visiting him, & saying something like 'Of course, you don't really believe you made the whole thing up, do you?' (referring to LotR), & Tolkien replies, 'No, not any longer'.
1) Do we know who the visitor was? 2) Do we know how he meant the remark? 3) Do we know how Tolkien meant his response to be understood? In other words, was the visitor implying more than just that Tolkien had used bits of myths & legends? Was he implying more than just some kind of religiously inspired allegory? Was the visitor implying something more precise, ie, that in some way Middle Earth is, or was, real? And did Tolkien understand his statement in that way? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |||||
A Northern Soul
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Valinor
Posts: 1,847
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Quote:
It was not at all an allegory. Allegory is a conscious attempt at depicting something using something else. Tolkien did not do this. Quote:
This is one of my favourite excerpts from the Letters. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
...take counsel with thyself, and remember who and what thou art. |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Illustrious Ulair
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In the home of lost causes, and forsaken beliefs, and unpopular names,and impossible loyalties
Posts: 4,240
![]() ![]() |
![]()
OK, allegory was a bad choice of word. It was a shorthand. What I meant was, an attempt to communicate a specific viewpoint on religion/philosophy, or explore specific themes - love, sacrifice, time, mortality, etc.
Was the visitor implying more than that?, That somehow Tolkien had tapped into 'something' else? And was Tolkien resonding to that, ie, saying yes, you're right, I didn't invent it, cobble it together, from bits & pieces, I was in touch with something else. One problem I have is that the whole world of Middle Earth is too 'coherent', it doesn't feel 'made up'. That, it seems to me, was what the visitor was saying. What Tolkien himself was saying seems to me even more curious, that he was 'alarmed' by the idea. For that reason, I don't think Tolkien was implying that he considered it was just a 'rehash' of the myths & legends he was so familiar with. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,448
![]() ![]() |
yes I have always thought Middle-Earth was far too...detailed perhaps?
lines of kings histories of legends languages written languages. culturesw fully developped. but most importantly Tolkien did not know the full tale to some of the charactors he did not know what happened to the entwives or the blue wizards...if Tolkien fully created this world wouldnt he have known? Quote:
__________________
Morsul the Resurrected |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Fair and Cold
|
The supreme coherence could just be a sign of an exceptional talent for immersing the reader completely in the events of the story. When I first read LotR, I would feel all weird when the phone would ring or some alarm would go off, bringing me back to my room, my house, my planet, my life. This is good writing, divine inspiration, probably (if you believe in that sort of thing), with its purposes, but was it actually portraying some sort of reality that would be tangible to our physical form? Probably not. If that's the case, I'd have to be seriously worried, because I experienced a similar immersion when I read and re-read Lolita.
![]()
__________________
~The beginning is the word and the end is silence. And in between are all the stories. This is one of mine~ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |