Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
05-04-2018, 10:01 AM | #1 | |||
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,720
|
The Sindarin Princes of the Silvan Elves
This is the first draft of the chapter 1 in the part The Black Years which is named The Sindarin Princes of the Silvan Elves.
Since in this part I found it very difficult to nominate a basic text, all snippets I used are marked by an editing mark with source information. The markings are: BY-HL-zz for Black Years, Head-Lines, marking all headlines for the chapters in this part. SP-SL-zz for The Sindarin Princes of the Silvian Elves, Story-Line, to document all changes that construct the main text. SP-HM-xx for The Sindarin Princes of the Silvian Elves, The Happy Mariners, for all changes inside that poem. Some conventions of my writing: Normal Text is from the text that is mentioned in the source information of each insert. Bold Text = source information, comments and remarks {example} = text that should be deleted [example] = normalised text, normally only used for general changes <source example> = additions with source information example = text inserted for grammatical or metrical reason /example/ = outline expansion Normally if an inserted text includes the beginning of a new § these is indicated by a missing “>” at the end of the § and a missing “<” at the beginning of the next. Quote:
BY-HL-01: I think we discussed that already shortly in the outline thread. The overall plan is to divide TRANSLATION FROM THE ELVISH volume 2: NÚMENOR AND THE HISTORY OF THE NORTH-WEST OF MIDDLE-EARTH in two parts. The Black Years for the Second Age and The Third Age or as ArcusCalion named it The Fading Years. BY-HL-02: This title is taken from the Appendix B of The History of Galadriel and Celeborn in UT. I found that most fitting for what we have to tell first. As is seen in the next editing, I followed Of the Rings of Power and the Third Age in the arrangement of the story elements. SP-SL-01: I used the introduction of Of the Rings of Power and the Third Age but not the title which is used later on. SP-SL-02: Nearly a regular change, since we decided to have Orodreth as the father of Gil-galad. SP-SL-03: Here I introduced this sentence from Appendix B of LotR. SP-SL-04: Probably we should under this editing marker discuss if we include the poem or not. The former discussion about it is found in the thread “** Revising The Voyage of Earendil” BY-HL-03: The title of the poem seemed to me a good enough introduction. SP-HM-01 to SP-HM-10: All these changes bring the second text of The Happy Mariners given in HoME 2, Chapter 5: The Tale of Earendel to the state of the text as revised in 1940. Christopher Tolkien wrote: Quote:
SP-SL-05 & SP-SL-06: Here I used the Appendix B text as a basis for giving the example of Orodreth. In LotR Thranduil isnamed and not Oropher how actauly was the Sindarin to establish the realm in Grennwood. Also the place was not at first the north of Greenwood. SP-SL-07: I also think we should bring in here Amdír, Sindarin King of Lórien and that passage was the best choice I could find. SP-SL-08: With this passage about the nature of the Silvian Elves we are back to more secure ground. SP-SL-09: As Celeborn is as well as Oropher and Amdír a Sindarin Prince establishing realms east of Ered Lindon, and for that matter the best documented case, I found it appropriate to tell part of the ‘History of Galadriel and Celeborn under this chapter. SP-SL-10: We start with a (by necessity) short retrospective telling of the First Age journey of the couple to Eriador and beyond. I know that gondowe had told this in his version at the chronologically right place, but we find in many stories given in this part introductions with some retrospective (re-)telling. Therefore I found it much more convenient to collect that story here instead of spreading all over the First Age chapters. SP-SL-11:This is a difficult editorial addition, but I found no better way to bring Celeborn back, which we know as a ‘fact’. SP-SL-12: Again I used the text in an probably unwanted way. The reference of the mountains is now changed from Ered Lindon to the Hiteaglir or at least that is the strait forward interpretation. I could argue that the terms ‘inner lands’ refers as well to Eriador and so the text is still to be understood as it was written. But to be honest that was not how I used the text here. If this re-interpretation is not acceptable, we might use the passage from LotR where Galadriel said she crossed the mountains (Hitheaglir) before the fall of Nargothrond and Gondolin in addition to the last part about the summons of Eönwë to construct a text: Quote:
SP-SL-14: I found no good place to state the simple fact that Celeborn escaped the sack of Doriath in the First Age narrative. Where I tried to put it, it either was an isolated information breaking the narrative or I had to specify some terms of that escape, which would have been fan-fictional. So I think again that this is best told here in retrospective. SP-SL-15: Here I removed the reference to The Silmarillion and Amroth as son of Galadriel and Celeborn, so I think we should keep the information that the birth place and time of Celebrian is unrecorded. SP-SL-16 & SP-SL-18: Again a reference to The Silmarillion removed. SP-SL-17 & SP-SL-19: Footnote 3 & 4 are a references to LotR which I think we have to remove. SP-SL-20: Celebrimbor is in our version the son of Curufin, and I edited the text as to repeat that information. SP-SL-21: I am happy that we have in the text in UT these marker of direct quote from original text, but we have no choice and must use Christopher’s retelling, so we have to remove the quotation marks. SP-SL-22: Again a reference to LotR removed. SP-SL-23: Here we come back to Of the Rings of Power, which I used as a kind of guideline for the arrangement of the texts. SP-SL-24: I skipt that sentence to avoid redundancy. SP-SL-25: We have used this half-sentence in our First Age narrative, so I think we must remove it here. SP-SL-26: in this last paragraph we come back to Oropher, because here we can now give his reason for the first northward removal. SP-SL-27: Even so this is marked in UT as a comment by Christopher to the character Oropher, I think we must give this information somewhere. And this seems the best place. Respectfully Findegil |
|||
05-05-2018, 10:49 AM | #2 |
Wight
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 246
|
Only a fast commentary
SP-SL-14: I found no good place to state the simple fact that Celeborn escaped the sack of Doriath in the First Age narrative. Where I tried to put it, it either was an isolated information breaking the narrative or I had to specify some terms of that escape, which would have been fan-fictional. So I think again that this. When it is said at the end os OtRoD that Elwing escaped from Doriath with part of the people I introduced that whit her was Celeborn. (As I remember). But it is well place your composition, as well as mine, in fact it couls be said that it is the same time place. It is only divided by a title and a volume division. Greetings |
05-06-2018, 12:02 AM | #3 | ||||
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
|
I will respond to each point raised by Fin in order. Any to which I do not respond, I agree with.
SP-SL-03: This looks good, but perhaps we should include the bit from Dwarves and Men, footnote number 65: Quote:
SP-SL-07: The second part of this addition is from a larger paragraph used later on in Of the Rings of Power. Should we not leave it there? Or do you suggest repeating it? As for the first part and the addition of Amroth, I agree with the reasoning, but I am unsure if there is a pressing need to write something like this wholecloth. Do the rules allow for such invention? SP-SL-08: This is fine, but in my version I added after this paragraph another insertion from Appendix A of Concerning Galadriel and Celeborn: Quote:
SP-SL-13, 14: This whole paragraph came together marvelously, but I have added the bit from the Shibboleth about her choice: Quote:
SP-SL-15: The part that says her birth is unrecorded is an editorial observation by Christopher, not a lore point by Tolkien. Therefore, there is absolutely no reason to stick to that as canon, and certainly no reason to include CT's editorial comment as part of the text. I personally see no issue with simply replacing Amroth's name with Celebrian. SP-SL-26: I have another addition right before this paragraph talking about Oropher: Quote:
25.7 This paragraph dates to a time before Tolkien decided that the Silvan language had died out, and so I changed it to reflect his later views. 26.1 At this point in time, the country is named Lórinand, and so I think we should reflect that in the text. I have changed it in the following paragraphs as well. 28 This is from the note to the Gladden Fields. I felt that it fit better here in the narrative than in a random footnote to a much much later text, so I've moved it here. This is an excellent chapter, and a brilliant start to the Second Age narratives! I'm very excited to go forward on this. I apologize for the length of the post. |
||||
05-06-2018, 03:02 PM | #4 | ||
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,720
|
Posted by gondowe:
Quote:
SP-SL-03.5: This note was repeated in UT and I used it later on, when Galadriel and Celeborn returned to Lindon. But that can be discussed. SP-SL-04: Actually I tend to agree to your choice to postpone it to part 3. I included it here because when we discussed it first as a part the chapter about the Voyage of Eärendil, we discovered that the time of such a journey as these happy mariners make can only be the Second Age between the main return of the exiles at the beginn of the Age and the time when the visits of Eressean Eldar to Númenor stopped, I suppose. And in that time span this place seemed to me the best fitting. But the idea of placing it in part 3 didn't come to my mind. SP-SL-07: Repeating this sentence is no option. And to use the complete section here as well not good, since the reason for Orophers northward movement will is told after this placement. To use the complete section later is an option, but I found it desierable to give these excamples of the Sindarin leaders establishing realms among the Silvian Elves. SP-SL-08.5: Good find! This is nice addition that I missed. SP-SL-12.7: This does not work for me. In RGEO we have ban on Galadriels return. Since RGEO is a high priority source, we can not here creat a text that would denie the ban. I tried to circumfent that question in my version, so it might be that I failed. If that is so, we have edit any passage out that does sound like there was a possibilty for return of Galadriel at this stage in the history. SP-SL-15: To replace Amroth with Celebrian would creat an unknow fact in Middel-earth, which is clearly against our rules. So we either state the fact that her birth place is unknown, for which I tried to use Christophers 'comment' or we skip that sentence. SP-SL-25.5 & SP-SL-25.7: Good find! But I don't think that {adopting}[learning] does help. I have to search about this a bit longer, but think we have passages describing the slow process from the Sindarin intruders adopting Silvian speech over introduction of single words of Sindarin because they might better fit until the speech of Lórien and Mirkwood Elves was a kind of Sindrain dialect. SP-SL-26.1: Agreed. SP-SL-28: Good find. Posted by ArcusCalion: Quote:
Respectfully Findegil |
||
05-06-2018, 11:24 PM | #5 | |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
|
SP-SL-03.5: If it is used later on, then I think it is fine to leave it the way you had it.
SP-SL-04: Sounds good, I will leave it in Volume 3. SP-SL-07: I agree that it is beneficial to mention these leaders here. I would suggest this as a solution: Quote:
SP-SL-12.7: Ahhh I see, I had forgotten about the supremacy of RGEO. You are right in your original draft in that case, and I rescind my suggestion. SP-SL-15: I see now your reasoning, but I think it is better to leave the sentence off entirely then, instead of to include CT's commentary. SP-SL-25.5/25.7: I think this change is all that is required. In later drafts re included more inserts about the changes in Sindarin due to the Silvan influence, so I do not think we need to make that explicit here. I think the {adopting}[learning] change is sufficient to set the stage, and conveys the meaning. Last edited by ArcusCalion; 05-06-2018 at 11:48 PM. |
|
05-09-2018, 12:53 PM | #6 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,720
|
SP-SL-07: Agreed.
SP-SL-15: It is okay for me, to leave the sentence out. SP-SL-25.5 & SP-SL-25.7: Okay, we can work in that way. Respectfully Findegil |
12-02-2018, 06:40 AM | #7 | ||||
Wight
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 121
|
The second age is so muddled and confusing, I think this is a great first chapter. A few comments:
1) Quote:
2) Both Ered Luin and Ered Lindon are both used to refer to the Blue Mountains. Are we using whatever Tolkien used in a particular text? Or is part of this project to regularize names, i.e. use Ered Luin consistently? 3) I know Celeborn is a Sindar who eventually becomes a leader of the Silvan elves in Lorien, but it seems like the added sections about Celeborn and Galadriel only describe their settling in Eregion and therefore these sections don't really seem to fit based on the title of the chapter, unless we add in their settling in Lórinand. Later in the chapter it states that Oropher resented the intrusions of Celeborn and Galadriel into Lórinand but this is not discussed in the chapter. Are we attempting to make the sequence of chapters chronological to the best of our ability? I also have some comments about the text itself, I have bolded parts I wish to discuss: Quote:
4) Quote:
5) I like the addition of Amdir to this section, but I wish there was a bit more we could say about him. If the chapters aren't meant to be completely chronological, I think we could add in the two paragraphs (with some minor editorial changes) from Unfinished Tales in the "Amroth and Nimrodel" section after Christropher Tolkien says "The essay continues with a brief explanation...": Quote:
|
||||
12-02-2018, 10:56 PM | #8 | |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
|
1) thanks for the catch! I fixed it in my copy.
2) If people or places or things have more than one name, Tolkien at times uses various ones, and we have not standardized them in the past. Both these names for the range have been given and explained before, so the reader knows them already. 3) The titles for the chapters are only ever taken from Tolkien himself. We do not invent chapter titles. Therefore, we are often at a loss to find ones that fit perfectly. This one fits the best of the options available, even if it fits imperfectly. As for the timeline it goes thus: Celeborn and Galadriel go east over the Ered Lindon -> Celeborn returns to Doriath -> Doriath is sacked by the Sons of Feanor -> War of Wrath/summons of Eonwe -> Galadriel comes back to Lindon too late to hear the summons -> she and Celeborn go back east again over the Ered Lindon into Eriador. However, you are right to point out that in the draft we have, Galadriel is said to depart east over the Ered Lindon twice here: Quote:
4) You are right, it can easily be removed to remove the redundancy. 5) I see no reason to add these paragraphs here. They describe his son Amroth, and it says 'at the time of the death of Amroth' which is the middle of the Third Age. As it stands, those paragraphs are included in the Third Age chapter 'Of the Legend of Amroth and Nimrodel.' I also wish we knew more about Amdir, but unfortunately Tolkien never wrote more than the few footnotes and tidbits mentioning him. |
|
12-03-2018, 04:05 PM | #9 | |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,720
|
Welcome gandalf85!
1) Thanks for pointing out that typo. 2) Interesting question. This has to be discussed. For the time being I did use whatever Tolkien used in texts that I collected together. But you are right some consistency would probably be nice. For me Ered Lindon is the later name in the Middel-earth time line, since that name must have become common when Lindon was occupied by Nolder in the second age. But however both names are clearly valid in all time so we could as well keep them parallel, as ArcusCalion suggested. 3) A very good catch! You’re a right if the title is fitting is based on the definition of the term ‘Silvan Elves’. Since Galadirel and Celeborn are Lord and Lady of Eriador, the wandering companies of that land are clearly Nandor. But it is an open question of the Nandor of Eriaodr are a subgroup of the Silvan Elves, since the first definition we get is: ‘The Silvan Elves (Tawarwaith) were in origin Teleri, and so remoter kin of the Sindar, though even longer separated from them than the Teleri of Valinor. They were descended from those of the Teleri who, on the Great Journey, were daunted by the Misty Mountains and lingered in the Vale of Anduin, and so never reached Beleriand or the Sea. They were thus closer akin to the Nandor (otherwise called the Green-elves) of Ossiriand, who eventually crossed the mountains and came at last into Beleriand.‘ The reference to the kinship is here to the Nandor of Ossiriand in special. I think that this makes a difference since these Beleriandic Nandor could be taken as removed from the more rustic Silvan Elves by their contact to the Noldor and specially the Sindar. The settlement of Galdriel and Celeborn in Lorien is so much later that it would fully destroy any chronological telling, so I don’t think we can add that. Asked by Gandalf85: Quote:
However, even if the Nandor of Eriador are considered a separate people from the Silvan Elves, I think the title might still stand since we nicely meshed in references to the Silan Elves at the start and the end of the chapter. I agree that this is difficult to figure out from our text, but we do not have anything better to work with and what we presented was the best arrangement we could find for the very complex movement of Galadriel and Celeborn, as ArcusCalion and I agreed on as our working hypothesis. It is not made easier by the fact that we tell part of it in retrospective, but I don’t think there is any other choice. To lift your confusion, an analysis of the text like this might help: - ‘… Galadriel and Celeborn departed over Ered Lindon before the end of the First Age’ - ‘When Celeborn returned later to Doriath she [Galadriel] passed east over the mountains [Hithaeglir] and forsook Beleriand, and first of all the Noldor came to the inner lands; and too late she heard the summons of Eönwë[ at the End of the First Age to join him in the fight against Morgoth].’ [Nonetheless she came to Beleriand after the fight was over, see over next point.] - ‘Celeborn, ... had escaped the sack of Doriath and would not leave Middle-earth’ [at the beginning of the Second Age, when Eönwë departed with most of the Elves of Beleriand] - ‘For love of Celeborn ... (and probably with some pride of her own, for she [Galadriel] had been one of those eager to adventure there), she did not go West at the Downfall of Melkor, but crossed Ered Lindon with Celeborn and came into Eriador. ... and for a while they dwelt in the country about Lake Nenuial (Evendim, north of the Shire).’ 4) Yes, it is redundant, but I think that is bearable at least. In other places we have once and again Gwindor son of Guillin. 5) We used these paragraphs later, so I as well think we cannot use them here. Respectfully Findegil |
|
12-03-2018, 04:48 PM | #10 | |
Wight
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 121
|
I will try to respond to both ArcusCalion and Findegil.
1) No problem. 2) Yeah, it seems both names are valid for all time so using them interchangeably should be fine. 3) Thanks for the explanations. I have one questions: Quote:
4) It's fine either way, it just seemed redundant to me so close to the discussion of his heritage. 5) The reason why I tried to add in some more about Amdir is because he fits the chapter title (he is a Sindarin prince of the Silvan elves). But I couldn't find any text which would fit nicely into the chapter. I think just having the brief mention of him as you originally had it is the best way to go. |
|
12-03-2018, 10:11 PM | #11 | |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
|
3) I am actually with gandalf here Fin. Perhaps we can leave out this portion? We do not need to explicitly mention her crossing of 'the mountains' (which to you mean the Hithaeglir), as leaving it out would not take a stance either way. perhaps like this:
Quote:
|
|
12-07-2018, 03:39 PM | #12 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,720
|
The detailed discussion of these points done before we made the text given in this thread was started in this thread in 'The Books' Forum: The History of Galadriel and Celeborn. But since in that forum other priority rules are applied the real research was done in the thread Galadriel and Celeborn. It might be worth rereading these threads again before take any new decision.
Respectfully Findegil |
12-07-2018, 05:02 PM | #13 |
Wight
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 121
|
Yeah, I assumed this chapter might work better in context along with the "Galadriel and Celeborn" chapter which I haven't reviewed yet. I will try to look over this chapter again after reading "Galadriel and Celeborn".
|
12-09-2018, 07:57 AM | #14 | |
Wight
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 121
|
After reading over the "Galadriel and Celeborn" thread, I can see why you assumed Galadriel crossed over the Misty Mountains and I agree. I think we should make this explicit in this chapter since in the current draft it is very ambiguous:
Quote:
|
|
12-10-2018, 11:31 PM | #15 | |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,720
|
As you have surely marked, gandalf85, Galadriel and Celeborn is not a thread about a chapter but a preliminary discussion about the couple and all their movements, in which I tried to get a kind of a working basis for the production of the drafts.
Making the crossing of the Misty Mountains explicit would force our interpretation of the famous sentence in the LotR on our reader. In questions like this where the facts are not fully clear we normally avoid this. As long as there is a doubt or another interpretation possible (as it clearly is in this case) we should try to make our text ambiguity enough to allow all possible interpretation of the sources. Actually I had hoped to generate different possible timelines in the thread Galadriel and Celeborn. But it didn’t work out in that way. Since the sentence and it use here as meaning the Misty Mountians is already borderline tour rules, I would think rather to change it in this way: Quote:
But I am still very hesitant about that. As long as we do not name the mountains, it could be assumed that Galadriel first followed Celebron back to Beleriand and then crossed again Ered Lindon to ‘forseek Beleriand’. Respectfully Findegil |
|
12-11-2018, 11:37 AM | #16 |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
|
That works for me
|
|
|