Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
09-09-2015, 06:14 AM | #161 | |
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Tol Morwen
Posts: 358
|
Concerning Ulmo's message - I think it should stand as it is. After all, Turgon is the last significant threat to Morgoth, and even if he, by himself, cannot stand alone against Angband, it could still mean that he (along with other potential allies) could gather all of his forces to a safer refuge (say, Balar) and then wait for the aid of the Valar - which would mean a substantial help would come to the Host of the West when they arrive to the Beleriand - and Turgon would indeed be haled as one of the greatest heroes of the War of Wrath - nonetheless, in the end, the Doom of Mandos was inevitable.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
09-09-2015, 09:18 AM | #162 | |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,720
|
Can you please specify what you mean by:
Quote:
Respectfuly Findegil |
|
09-11-2015, 12:12 PM | #163 | |
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Tol Morwen
Posts: 358
|
The one from the Lost Tales.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
09-11-2015, 12:13 PM | #164 | |
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Tol Morwen
Posts: 358
|
Also, I would like to add the essay "Glorfindel" from the PoME - I think it would add a nice touch to the story.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
09-12-2015, 05:29 PM | #165 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,720
|
To take the Lost Tale verssion of the conversation between Tuor and Turgon is out of question as the discussion stands now.
We have Aiwendil's last outline: - Tuor bids Turgon prepare for a war against Morgoth, describes the means of preparing (alliances with the Feanorians and with men of the east, probable succour from the Valar), and describes the consequences of such a war (a terrible battle but a chance for real victory). - Tuor further says that if Turgon refuses this counsel, then he should abandon Gondolin and seek refuge at the mouths of Sirion. - Idril and Turgon's wise councillors speak in favour of this (the latter) advice. - Turgon refuses both the first counsel and the second counsel. I have right now no time to try that out, but I would propose that we could serve the result of the discussion better, if we could avoid that abandon Gondolin is only the counsel if Turgon will not prepare for war. The essay Glorfindel might be an ingredent in a part of the second age material but for sure not in FoG. Respectfuly Findegil Last edited by Findegil; 09-12-2015 at 05:36 PM. |
09-23-2015, 03:45 PM | #166 | |||
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
|
Quote:
- Tuor bids Turgon prepare for a war against Morgoth, describes the means of preparing (alliances with the Feanorians and with men of the east, probable succour from the Valar), and describes the consequences of such a war (a terrible battle but a chance for real victory). - Tuor further says that if Turgon refuses this counsel, then he should abandon Gondolin and seek refuge at the mouths of Sirion. - Idril and Turgon's wise councillors speak in favour of this (the latter) advice. - Turgon refuses both the first counsel and the second counsel. Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Aiwendil; 09-23-2015 at 03:52 PM. |
|||
09-23-2015, 04:50 PM | #167 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,720
|
My problem with your outline, Aiwendil, is exactly that Tuor does provide Turgon with an alternative, if he would not wage that war he is advocating in Ulmo's name. I think the difference is bit the opposit of Yoda saying that you should not try, you should do it.
I mean, that if we press the counsel to go war and to leave Gondolin together in on speach of Tuor, then we should avoid presenting them as alternatives. I would agree to an 'at least' but not an 'if ... then'. Respectfully Findegil |
09-25-2015, 08:16 AM | #168 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,720
|
Okay, reading some of the older postings brougth mer back into this discussion. May be summary is agian needed:
- At first Maedhros, Aiwendil agreed not to take up the counsel of Ulmo that Turgon should wage a war against Morgoth. I consented to this but with reservations. - Later Aiwendil found that probably the urging to prepare for a war should be included, but gondowe had joined the group and had some reservations about that. So my Feeling from the arguemnts of gondowe is that he is more concerned with the importance of parts of the counsel then with leaving the war out completly. - Now Arvegil145 has joined and is for including the counsel of war. So at least we have overcome the patt situation. It seems to me that we all agree now to Ulmo asking Turgon to prepare for war, even so that might not be the most important part of the message. But going back to my own counsel to work with arguments based on supporting textual evidence: The pricipals say that the younger the text, the more wigth it should have, so we might start with the passage in Grey Annals were Ulmo speaks to Turgon. Ulmo clearly warns Turgon that Gondolin will not stand for ever against Melkor, because of the Doom of Mandos. And that if the time come near that he will send Tuor. This seems to me the strongest support for gondowe's point of view, that the main motive of Ulmos counsel is to remove the Gondolidrim from the city. In the speach form Ulmo to Tuor we hear that Tuor sword is worth sending, which I would call a support for a forseen warlike out come by Ulmo. Later when Tuor speaks to Voronwë he Shows knowledge of the conversation between Ulmo and Turgon, that only the Gondolindrim (and Ulmo of course) had. I think from this Christopher Tolkien took the idea for Sil77 of recalling the Ulmo's words in Tuor meassage 'And he gave warning to Turgon that the Curse of Mandos now hastened to its fulfilment, when all the works of the Noldor should perish' and in Turgons pondering 'and there came into his mind the words that were spoken to him in Vinyamar ...'. When Ulmo revales to Turgon, that their is no hope in the war against Melkor with out the help from the west, than this can only mean: - Had Turgon followed the biding of Ulmo (what ever that had included), the out come would have been better then what is seen at the end of the 1. Age. (Other wise the biding would be sensless.) - Anyhow the overcome of Melkor would only be contrived with the help from the west. - So what ever exactly Ulmo asked Turgon to do, it would not have avoided the destruction/derssertion of Gondolin it would have changed the War of Wrath and ist out come. From the early source Prose fragment of the Tale of Tuor [HoME IV; chapter 1;i] we learn that, Ulmo proberbly did know that only a messager speaking in person for the Noldor and pleading for pardon would change the mind of the Valar and bring them to aid the people of Middle-earth against Melkor (This I have denied in previous posting, but I now see that I might have been wrong.) Thus I agree to gondowe that bring about the birth of Earendil was the most important intention of Ulmo's dealing with Tuor and Turgon. That this motive was still valid might be guesses from the persage of Huor and the vision of Cirdan about the rising star. Thus if Ulmo ask Turgon to send again messangers to Valinor after he removed from Gondolin, he is speaking of Earendil and nobody else. But again, if Turgon ist asked to do something by Ulmo the achievement of that deed must have be benevolent in some way. With this input what might have been the result if Turgon would have followed (this is spectlaution only but it might help to understand my point of view): - Turgon starts to perpare his folk to leave Gondolin - Tuor stays for a time an fathers Earendil. - Turgon starts to make alliances with all Elves left in Beleriand. - They remove from Gondolin before it is attaced. - Tuor is sent to the east an gather Men to the help in the battle to come. - With the intact force of Gondolin at the mouth of Sirion and allainces fromed between Turgon and Maedhros the third kin-slain would have been impossible. - Earendil would in the end have been reached Valinor (probably later, after taking his wife and the Silmaril onto his ship, only because she would no longer stay alone at home). - War of Wrath with the help of Men from the East, the Gondolindrim from the south and probably the Feanorian from the south-west. => Melkors Forces completly destroyed. With that in mind, it would be most important to leave Gondolin before the attac, because otherwise (as is seen in FoG) Earendil is in danger of being killed and with him the sole hope of secure for the Elves of Beleriand. Now all this rambling leads in my mind at least to the follwoing outline: - Tuor bides Turgon to abandon Gondolin, search refuge under Ulmos protection at Sirions mouth (he mentions unknown dangers greater than expected and a harder future for Middle-Earth if only that course is taken) and bides Turgon farther to prepare for the War against Morgoth to come. - Tuor speaks about the means by which that war should be prepared (alliance with the Men of the east build by the help of Tuor after a time of abiding in Gondolin and alliance with the Feanorians, probably succour by the Valar urged to this by Ulmo, but in the end only archivable through a messanger from the Gondlindrim [Earendil]) and consequences of that war (terrible battle but a chance for a real victory). - When Tuor Ends his speach the mantle of Ulmo desapears. - Maeglin speaks against the counsel of Ulmo and Idril supports it. - Turgon denies again by blaming the Valar for being blind and deaf against his messengers asking for help and of being not helpful so far in protecting his people against Morgoth. - Idril and the wiser councilors are troubled that Turgon did not follow the biding. Is that helpfull? Respectfully Findegil |
10-04-2015, 01:48 PM | #169 | |
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
|
I suppose I'm just not convinced, even if the counsel of war includes the abandonment of Gondolin, that it necessarily includes the specific instructions to go down to Sirion's mouths. Moreover, I'm still not really convinced that the counsel of war necessarily involves the abandonment of Gondolin.
Quote:
- Tuor bids Turgon prepare for a war against Morgoth, describes the means of preparing (alliances with the Feanorians and with men of the east, probable succour from the Valar), and describes the consequences of such a war (a terrible battle but a chance for real victory). It is not explicitly said, at this point, whether such a war would involve abandoning Gondolin, but perhaps this is understood to be implied. - Tuor further says that if Turgon refuses to go to war, then he should (still) abandon Gondolin and seek refuge at the mouths of Sirion. - Idril and Turgon's wise councillors speak in favour of this (the latter) advice. - Turgon refuses both the first counsel and the second counsel. So if you want to interpret it in such a way that the counsel of war involves abandoning Gondolin, then Ulmo is saying (through Tuor): "Even if you refuse to do the war thing, you should still at least do the part where you abandon your city and seek refuge at the mouths of Sirion. |
|
10-05-2015, 10:35 AM | #170 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,720
|
Yes, formulated in such a way I at least can agree to your outline, Aiwendil.
What about the others? Gondowe? Arvegil145? If both of you agree I will try to make a draft from this outline. Respectfully Findegil |
10-05-2015, 12:24 PM | #171 | |
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Tol Morwen
Posts: 358
|
I agree.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
10-09-2015, 04:35 PM | #172 | |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,720
|
Earlier as I aspected, I got a chance to make a draft. Here we go:
Quote:
FG-T-23: This complete paragraph was already discussed and agreed. I add it only for completness. FG-T-24: This marks only were the counsel of Ulmo (and the troule with it) begins. FG-T-24.1: That Ulmo knowest of Gondolin is a given fact in our version, therefore part of this must go. But why gondowe took out so much he never explained. FG-T-24.2: Earlier when he spoke to Tuor in Vinyamar Ulmo said that he did send Tuor against the will of the other Valar. Therefore he should not mention them here. FG-T-24.3: The first part of the sentence was skipt by gondowe, but I think it should be kept. FG-T-24.4: I put the warning first, to give it more wiegth. FG-T-24.6 & FG-T-24.5: These two are back in the position they had have. FG-T-24.55: If the voyage of Eärendil ist he final goal, then if Turgon would follow Ulmos biding Turgon is to send him. FG-T-24.57: I took this up. It is not absolutley necessary, but as Ulmo does know quite well that Turgon had send many meassangers without availe, he should ofer some help to make the quest less hopeless. FG-T-24.77: This deals with Tuor's role. As we agreed that the most improtant part for Ulmo was the fathering of Earendil, it might be necessary to emphasis that Tuor was never supposed to leave Gondolin at once to search for an allaince with men. This was made clear in the Sketch. FG-T-24.79: As FG-T-24.77 splited this addition I added this to make more clear where this text comes from. FG-T-25: Okay we agreed to have only one answer from Turgon. The editing marks are hereafter no longer numbered in a stright forward fashion, but stick to the text fragments to which they were first applied. FG-T-24.8: Here I used a big part of Q30 which is the latest telling we have. FG-T-24.9: As Ulmos counsel to war is back, he might also promise victory. FG-T-24.95: Again we skip Turgons answer. FG-T-24.6 & FG-T-24.65: Here at last we make the counsel explicit to leave Gondolin. The passage from Q30, QI add to make it more urgent. FG-T-25.67: We lost that part of the greater danger if flight only was the course, but I thought it belongs here. FG-T-24.91: I think that here is the right place to end Tuors mission. He has brought forward all choices and arguments that Ulmo could give. As wished in one long statement. FG-T-25.3: If we want to put in FG-T-25.34 from Q30 with Maeglin speaking against Tuor, we need an intro here. And even so I am a bit reluctant to use that source QS77 is the best we can find and it is a nice echo of the words of Ulmo which come ultimatley from GA. FG-T-25.31: At this point at last we know were the text from QS77 comes from. FG-T-25.32: This change is questionable. It does bring the original text of Q30 to the text found in QS77. The text sound better to my ear, but we can consider it as a change for style only and reject it. FG-T-25.35 & FG-T-25.36: Here I took together the answeres of Turgon. FG-T-25.53: The ages are out of question. I wonder how they ever fited the time frame of LT. FG-T-26: Not sure of this verys old change. It is rather one of style. FG-GT-01 & FG-GT-01.5: This was already agreed upon. FG-T-25.33: This we can probably leave out, but I found it very fitting as closer to the debate of Turgon and Tuor. Respectfully Findegil |
|
|
|