Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
12-27-2004, 07:14 AM | #41 | ||
Brightness of a Blade
|
Quote:
There are books that I love the first time around but I don't exactly feel like re-reading them, even after a long time. But with LOTR, it's different, from time to time I feel the need to pick it up again, even if it's just to read a passage or two, though most of the times, I read it from start to finish. One of my favourite luxuries is to sit in an armchair at night, with a cup of hot chocolate close by and read LOTR, without having to worry about getting up early the next day. It's more than just the pleasure of reading though, it's like (to paraphrase Lalwendë's beautiful ex-sig), I try with the words to awaken the feeling. Quote:
Other books that I've re-read (though not for the same reasons) - some have been mentioned here before: Silmarillion, Hobbit, Unfinished Tales (it feels like I'm throwing them all here like apples in a basket ) Wuthering Heights - Emily Brontë Edgar Allan Poe's Stories - uh, Poe, I guess The Last Unicorn - Peter Beagle Possession - A.S. Byatt Some Shakespeare plays The Magician - John Fowles Fahrenheit 451 - Ray Bradbury Midsummer's Night - Mircea Eliade (that's a book I recommend to everyone on this forum, hopefully you'll find it translated). I also re-read children's books, (most of thier titles I wouldn't even know how to translate in English), just because I still love them a lot. Among those there's one of my favourite books ever, a collection of Italian folk tales, put together by Luigi Capuana. That book can be read and enjoyed by anyone, no matter their age.
__________________
And no one was ill, and everyone was pleased, except those who had to mow the grass. |
||
09-17-2014, 06:45 PM | #42 | |
Dead Serious
|
Yesterday I brought back What Breaks the Enchantment?, which struck a note with me by showing a significant change or two in my own reading habits with Tolkien over the years, and in today's perusal of the forgotten archives, this discussion of rereading seemed to resonate with a similar theme.
I was about eleven when I first read The Lord of the Rings* and I no longer remember much of that first read-through. Or the one that immediately followed. Or the one that immediately followed THAT. I do know that, between reading other books (I was a voracious reader as a child/pre-teen and shall forever regret that I have lost that Bombur-esque appetite), I returned again and again to The Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit--though more especially the former. I went seeking as much that I could find that was similar. At first I thought I liked the fantasy genre, but I have never really found a fantasy author that pleased me, and I also tried to devour everything Tolkien I could find. At first, The Silmarillion didn't cut it, but after a few attempts--and a year or two of growing up--that changed, and it was the added to the rotation. So too pieces of Unfinished Tales, and I have the dubious distinction of having RE-read each volume of the HoME--some more than once. All of this was was before I was eighteen. Then the Internet came (not all bad: note this website), and university, and growing up in general. Not that I ever laid Tolkien aside, mind you. I have reread bits and pieces here and there throughout the years, but the speed has decreased, largely because my overall reading has decreased and because, having read so repeatedly during those formative years, so many of the words of Middle-earth are lodged in the crannies of my skull with a persistence that might be inappropriate outside of a scriptural text. But why? And why, having so thoroughly squeezed all the novelty out of these texts (the defence that "I learn something new each time" ceased to be 100% true--at least in the sense it's normally intended to have--a long time ago, though I by no means wish to suggest I know everything or have foregone learning) do I return to them? Yes, my current reread of The Two Towers is progressing at what 13-year-old me would have called a snail's pace, but that's as much because I'm savouring the process as because I have far less leisure time. And it really is unique to Tolkien for me. Like Lalwendë above, I think rereading a thoroughly normal activity and I have reread many a good book--including mystery novels--but the extent to which I have reread Tolkien's work is a cut above the rest of it. I can safely say I will reread Tolkien on a regular basis for the rest of my life. The main reason I would give is the same one that came up as I responded to the Enchantment Breaking thread: I have, essentially, become steeped in the text. It has thoroughly infected my ways of thinking, my ways of writing. Part of this is because I encountered the work at a pivotal age, but there is more. On this point, the words of Child, earlier in this thread, fit far better than my own: Quote:
In short, and in other words, I return to Middle-earth because it is like returning to my father's house: it is going home. Even if I am long away, I do not feel like a stranger upon returning because it made me who I am and I draw refreshment of self from being there. *I honestly don't know how old I was. By the time I was looking back to figure it out, it was impossible to tell. But it was somewhere in the 9-11 range...
__________________
I prefer history, true or feigned.
|
|
09-17-2014, 07:22 PM | #43 |
Gruesome Spectre
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Heaven's doorstep
Posts: 8,037
|
Very well written, Formy.
I first remember reading LOTR when I was maybe 10 or so. My father had read The Hobbit to me before that though, and I even have very vague memories of being taken to see the Bakshi film. In short, I cannot recall a time when Tolkien and Middle earth were wholly unknown to me. Unlike many here, I have never been a 'fantasy' reader, unless you count Stephen King, most of whose works I've become well enamored of (at least until the early part of the past decade, but that's another matter). Tolkien is the sole fantasy author in my bookcase. I have on occasion leafed through some other authors works, but I just can't seem to get the fire to follow through. All I can conclude is that Tolkien spoiled me. His combination of story, characterization, and perhaps over all, the magnificent verbiage, are unmatched. That's probably why I'm so critical of attempts by others to 'adapt' the books and put a different spin on them. I'm just not interested. Every couple of years, I seem to get it into my head to read Tolkien again. I finished the latest reread about 4 months ago. Each time I seem to have no trouble immersing myself, feeling the cool night air with Frodo, Sam, and Pippin leaving Hobbiton; following the dim glow of Gandalf's staff in the stifling darkness of Moria and hoping we'll get out again. Though in latter years my tastes have mostly run to non-fiction, it's ever a blessing to know that Middle earth is still waiting patiently for my return.
__________________
Music alone proves the existence of God. |
09-18-2014, 09:31 AM | #44 |
Pile O'Bones
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 18
|
Personally, my re-reading of Tolkien has evolved to the point that I mostly reread passages that I especially like rather than the whole book.
I do this very much in the way that many people read passages of their religious text(s) of choice but rarely read the whole work from cover to cover. Of course roughly once every 12-18 months I will re-read The Hobbit or LoTR in their entirety. But the frequency of my whole-readings has diminished over the past few years and my passage-reading has become more frequent. |
|
|