Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
08-13-2009, 08:08 AM | #201 | ||
Doubting Dwimmerlaik
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Heaven's basement
Posts: 2,466
|
You obviously haven't read through the Sequence-by-Sequence threads.
Quote:
Quote:
But that said, in order to boost my own theory, I must lay waste to the others. Tom cannot be an Ent, as his speech is much faster than that of any Ent, even Quickbeam. Goldberry is not an Entwife, as she's more into water sports than gardening (though if Tom has the last surviving Entwife around, I can see why he's hidden himself from the others). Tom is jolly, silly and wears a hat, and these aren't Ent traits either. So Tom is not an Ent. Next...
__________________
There is naught that you can do, other than to resist, with hope or without it.
|
||
08-13-2009, 08:17 AM | #202 | |
Gruesome Spectre
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Heaven's doorstep
Posts: 8,037
|
Quote:
Who said it was fun? Not at all. Attempting to make sense of the nonsensical is a constant exercise in enlightenment. To clarify, I'm not saying this topic, or any other for that matter, is an exercise in futility in trying to make a case one way or the other. Personally, I lean toward the 'Tom is Eru' view because it seems to make the most 'in-world' sense to me, though that certainly is an ever evolving opinion.
__________________
Music alone proves the existence of God. Last edited by Inziladun; 08-13-2009 at 08:39 AM. |
|
08-13-2009, 10:33 AM | #203 | ||||||
Doubting Dwimmerlaik
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Heaven's basement
Posts: 2,466
|
Agreed; in hindsight that wasn't very proper or friendly. Apologies; that the Tylenol and coffee hadn't taken effect will be my excuse. What I meant to say was:
"To show my theory valid, I will next show, politely, how other theories are less likely, given the evidence." Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Also, my argument has an analogy in Jesus the Christ. Christians believe Him to be 100% God yet 100% man. Though at any time He could have called forth angels to defend him - nay, to keep him from merely stubbing His toe - Jesus veiled His divinity, and so lived as as one of us. This meant that He could be scourged, stabbed, bleed, suffer thirst, and eventually die via crucifixion. Tolkien knew all of this. I posit that when he kept Tom in the text, he may have wanted the same kind of God-man around, self-limiting, though much more than your average citizen (especially as Eru was Goldberry and Fatty Lumpkin as well). Didn't Gandalf limit his power? So we have precedent. Quote:
...Though, as Tom seems to be only within in the Old Forest, not sure how he has talks with Farmer Maggot. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
There is naught that you can do, other than to resist, with hope or without it.
Last edited by alatar; 08-13-2009 at 10:46 AM. |
||||||
08-13-2009, 10:41 AM | #204 |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Twilight Zone
Posts: 736
|
Maybe Tom's power is limited because of the fact that he does not in a way belong. This goes back to the letter that talked about different planes of existence. It could just be because the plane of existence that Tom is from only overlaps with the forest and that makes his power limited to the forest. It could also be as Alatar stated and he set his own boundaries or it could be both.
__________________
Medicine for the soul. ~Inscription over the door of the Library at Thebes |
08-13-2009, 10:43 AM | #205 |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,448
|
I believe Elrond says something to the effect of "If Sauron came with all his mihgt not even Tom Bombadil could outlast him.
and the cube bit what I was saying was disproving one theory doesn't make another more valid. Hey, do the rings give their bearer power to bestow some sort of power to others? Bombadil almost seem to the Old Forest what Galadriel is to Lorien. and I think I'll delete my last post, mostly out of ander the tone is unbecoming of the downs
__________________
Morsul the Resurrected |
08-13-2009, 10:53 AM | #206 | ||||
Doubting Dwimmerlaik
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Heaven's basement
Posts: 2,466
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
There is naught that you can do, other than to resist, with hope or without it.
|
||||
08-13-2009, 11:04 AM | #207 |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,448
|
here's a unique theory
http://flyingmoose.org/tolksarc/theories/bombadil.html also on another site; Tom Bombadil is from Wonderland. He just plain doesn't fit in Middle-earth; he's much more "fairy-tale" than anything else that exists, with magical powers and implied incredible age despite being apparently human. His bit of the story is a cheerful diversion from the main plot, and almost seems to belong to another tale altogether. Alternatively, he's from Oz. Or, he is The One, aka Eru aka Ilúvatar. The Ring has no affect on him whatsoever, and in fact, he makes the Ring disappear briefly! When Frodo puts on the Ring, it is said he is putting one foot in the Wraith world and if he wears it too long, risks becoming a wraith. But the "wraith world" is not necessarily an evil place, for, because of the Ring, Frodo is able to see Glorfindel's "other side" the side that exists in the "wraith" or "spirit" world when Glorfindel goes all badass at the Ford of Bruinen. Tom does not disappear when he puts on the Ring, because the Ring has nowhere to pull him to, he already exists totally on "the other side" as the One. In a way, by making the Ring disappear, Tom is pulling the Ring all the way over to "the other side" with himself. Gandalf remarks at the Council of Elrond to the affect that it is notsomuch that Tom has power over the Ring as that the Ring has no power over him, which fits in with Tom as the One, since a creation cannot be higher than the Creator, but the One being a Creator that doesn't muck around with the free will of his creations (but doesn't mind extending a helping hand every now and again). Even Tom's habit of incessant singing fits this theory. The whole idea was Jossed by Tolkien in 1954, as he has stated in his letters that The One has no incarnation in Middle-earth. This naturally depends on how heavily you accept the Word Of God. Or, he is Aulë the Smith. Aulë is unique among the Valar in being fonder of life in Middle-earth than in Heaven, as the god of created objects he would naturally have power over the Ring, and he is romantically involved with an earth-mother goddess who is described in similar terms to Goldberry. Only he has the means, motive and opportunity. A longish essay (on painful background, unfortunately) on this premise is here. Oromë was like that too, and I could more easily imagine him as Bombadil than Aulë, whose fascination with created and non-living things just doesn't fit with Tom's close-to-nature lifestyle. Also, his nature as the "Eldest" being on Middle-earth would support this, as, if this troper remembers correctly, Oromë was the first of the Valar to set foot on Middle-earth and certainly the only one to remain there for any length of time. Or he's one of the Maiar, since Gandalf seems to view him on equal terms, not as a servant would his master. Tom Bombadil is Santa Claus, and Sauron is the Grinch. Tom, who of course is really the spirit of Middle-earth incarnate, switched rings on Frodo, claiming the Ring for himself. At the proper moment, he used the Ring to throw down Sauron, reducing him to powerlessness. Over the long centuries that followed, the Ring darkened his heart until he became Santa Claus, lord of greed, bringer of strife. It's all explained here. Or maybe he was just hanging around Middle-earth during that hundred-year-or-so period when he was kept out of Narnia by the White Witch. Tom Bombadil is the Witch-king of Angmar. Explained here. As strange as that theory is, it does look like it has textual backup. Tom Bombadil is Thomas Covenant. He's just enjoying a holiday after his fairly harrowing adventures in a foreign land. What, the name wasn't a hint? Tom Bombadil is the Green Man from folklore, the manifestation of the British/Shire countryside. At least metaphorically. That's the what Word Of God say he really but Tolkien just put him the story to mess with readers' heads. Tom Bombadil represents the reader. You are Tom Bombadil. He can see Frodo when he's wearing the ring, which has no power over him and Elrond says a world ruled by Sauron would have no interest for him but he could not take the ring himself. Isn't anyone going to say he's a Time Lord? He's actually an incarnation of Suzumiya Haruhi, when she was going through an obsession with medieval fantasy. Clearly Tom is actually a Refugee From Discworld. You know it's true
__________________
Morsul the Resurrected |
08-13-2009, 07:04 PM | #208 |
Cryptic Aura
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 5,996
|
I think Tom really practices the power of Now, don't you all think?
__________________
I’ll sing his roots off. I’ll sing a wind up and blow leaf and branch away. |
08-13-2009, 08:10 PM | #209 |
Flame of the Ainulindalë
|
Someone probably has said this already (and I'm not going back to see if one of you did like five years ago ), but Tom is JRRT himself naturally...
And I mean it. It's the obvious solution. Or then like a Finnish comparative-religion academic said in a radio-programme this summer; he's an offspring of an earlier Tolkien story he had gotten so fond of that he just wished to fit him in in the early stages and never got to write him out later as he didn't actually fit in... and most of you guys probably can give a list of letters of the Prof. to either comfirm that or to rebuke it. I like my theory the better but the latter seems quite credible.
__________________
Upon the hearth the fire is red Beneath the roof there is a bed; But not yet weary are our feet... |
08-14-2009, 02:56 AM | #210 | |
shadow of a doubt
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Back on the streets
Posts: 1,125
|
Quote:
__________________
"You can always come back, but you can't come back all the way" ~ Bob Dylan |
|
08-14-2009, 06:38 AM | #211 | |
Cryptic Aura
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 5,996
|
Quote:
Note too that Pitchwife, al and Morth subsequently admired the theory as they thought it could tidily be incorporated into their own. I must say I think I'll go and work on Pitchwife's anagram idea a bit . . . .
__________________
I’ll sing his roots off. I’ll sing a wind up and blow leaf and branch away. |
|
08-14-2009, 06:45 AM | #212 |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,448
|
Tolkien says Bombadil doesn't fit into middle-earth so only one true answer remains;
Eru creator of ME would fit in Any Vlar or Maiar samething. Tolkien himself fits in. Witchking Crazy Hobbit Hobo- even that works Tom Bombadil after process of elimination ; "When you eliminate the impossible that which is left, however improbable, is true"-Spock An Alien!
__________________
Morsul the Resurrected |
08-14-2009, 10:20 AM | #213 | |
Flame of the Ainulindalë
|
Quote:
Kudos! As one tends to think the idea he got himself and was pleased with as a great idea anyway!
__________________
Upon the hearth the fire is red Beneath the roof there is a bed; But not yet weary are our feet... |
|
08-16-2009, 09:43 AM | #214 |
Flame Imperishable
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Right here
Posts: 3,928
|
So that's why he's always singing. Now you know what the Music of the Ainur really sounded like .
Anyway, I think he is more something that Eru put there to be an antidote to the evil of Middle-Earth, so in a way, he is a manifestation of Eru, as he does what Eru wants, but isn't actually him. And also, remember the whole thing about trolls being made in mockery of Ents and Orcs being made in mockery of Elves/Men? I would assume that this was already decided in the Music, and that Melkor, hearing of Tom Bombadil (literally), created an opposite, Ungoliant. I'm sure that somewhere I've read that she is the primeval spirit of darkness and so, according to this, Tom would be the primeval spirit of good. This would actually make sense, as Tom is sort of made to be a perfect being: He is kind and carefree, he is a perfect partner with his wife (and together they make a whole), he is in tune with nature and isn't against it (e.g. he can talk to trees), he is his own master (nothing can take control of his mind, and he is himself all the time), and best of all, he is happy. And would you put it past Eru to make Goldberry for Tom, as God made Eve for Adam?
__________________
Welcome to the Barrow Do-owns Forum / Such a lovely place
|
08-16-2009, 10:38 AM | #215 | |
A Voice That Gainsayeth
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: In that far land beyond the Sea
Posts: 7,431
|
Quote:
I think Bombadil is the extreme example of isolation "outside" the history - almost, or on the very edge (mostly as an observer - as we are shown in the places where he tells something about old Arnor, the barrows or the woman wearing the jewel from that tomb). Only if it really came to that Tom would keep the Ring, and Sauron would have had to confront him, he would came into real "touch" with the history. But not otherwise. See, there was Sauron's rule all over Eriador (except Lindon) in the dark ages, while Tom was apparently still there in his place. Nothing touched him, and he was of no concern to Sauron's rule. No threat, except that maybe he could offer a shelter to a few passers-by - just like with Frodo. But he really didn't have any special "agenda", did he? He just helped Frodo because he managed to stop by, not because he would have some real urge to contribuge to destroying Sauron. All in all, Tom is really the closest to nature - also in this sense. But he has little to do with the history of humans, elves, hobbits or Dark Lords. In this way, he is not really a representative of any powers of the West or anything - he is just too passive, as in comparison to the Istari's mission, for example. Therefore, even his connection as some manifestation of Eru would be a bit doubtful (though it is true that theologically, Eru is not one of the most active gods himself, or at least he does not seem to be in the process of history - though still, TB is just too much even for him, and Eru has all these delegates like Valar and delegates of delegates like the Istari).
__________________
"Should the story say 'he ate bread,' the dramatic producer can only show 'a piece of bread' according to his taste or fancy, but the hearer of the story will think of bread in general and picture it in some form of his own." -On Fairy-Stories |
|
08-16-2009, 11:09 AM | #216 | ||
Gruesome Spectre
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Heaven's doorstep
Posts: 8,037
|
Quote:
Quote:
So the Valar, the most powerful and knowledgeable beings of Arda, were unaware of Ungoliant and did not know what manner of creature she was. Perhaps Tom was a being of the same sort, differently embodied. It would explain why the Eldar, taught by the Valar, had no clear notion what Tom was.
__________________
Music alone proves the existence of God. |
||
08-16-2009, 12:51 PM | #217 | |
Flame Imperishable
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Right here
Posts: 3,928
|
Quote:
He shows many the opposite characteristics of the bad characters:
Tom Bombadil is the opposite extreme to all the evil characters, and that is why no-one knows anything about him. He keeps to himself unlike any of the bad characters. And anyway, if Tom Bombadil actually interfered, then it would go against all of Melkor's designs, and then the Music of the Ainur wouldn't be more magnificent (Remember what Eru says about how Melkor's discord contributes to the Theme?) He wasn't there to go against the Music the way that Men were allowed to, and so the theme still played out. He was just there, I think, to give comfort to the few that passed his lands. There was only one time (that we know about), where he directly coincided with the fate of the world, and technically, he only helped them through his land and told them stories. He just gave them a much-needed break. It was still up to them to them to carry on the quest and destroy the ring, he just gave them a little bit of safety at the start of the quest. I don't think he was made to play a big part (while Ungoliant, who I regard as his opposite, but of the same nature, plays a huge part, such as in destroying the Trees) in the world, but just to be a safe haven, and in that way, he contributed to the good without influencing the world. Eru left that to his creations: His Children and the Ainur. The Ainur were almost as fallible as elves, only on a much huger scale, for example when Manwe decided to let Melkor go and he wreaked havoc upon Arda. I think that Tom Bombadil was pure in a way, but in an earthy way, unlike the Ainur who were not pure- look at Melkor. Because he (Tom Bombadil) was pure, he couldn't interfere with the world, otherwise there probably wouldn't even be a story. Think of what happens with the wights- they are evil and dangerous, and in his land, yet he only gets rid of one, and only when it threatens people. I think this shows him to be a truly good and pure being, as most of the "good" characters would have definitely got rid of the wights if they could, yet Tom lets them stay there and only interferes when someone's life, and in fact the whole fate of Middle-Earth, is at risk he acts, and then only destroys the immediate threat (one of the many wights). We can look at the ring in the same way. If he has it, then he probably wouldn't keep it safe because of his purity. He is so pure that the ring doesn't affect him like every other being in Middle-Earth. Because he is perfectly content, the ring has nothing to offer him, and so it has no power over him. He would just treat it as a normal ring, because to him, that is what it is. He is not affected by anything, but he also does not affect anything outside his realm, and only gets involved with things inside his realm if he needs to. So I think (if we disregard the AOTB, which isn't really Middle-Earth canon, to me at least), that the Tom Bombadil we see in Middle-Earth is a wholly good character, and only gets involved when there is a benefit for the greater good (or just for the good side in general), and does not become involved just because he can.
__________________
Welcome to the Barrow Do-owns Forum / Such a lovely place
|
|
08-16-2009, 01:41 PM | #218 |
A Voice That Gainsayeth
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: In that far land beyond the Sea
Posts: 7,431
|
Okay, now I can say I more or less agree with you, Eönwë, on most points - more or less. But maybe just as reply to this, to make it clear:
But that was the point. You used the word "antidote", which is, in this case, not well used at all. Tom was the first pure thing before any antidote had to be used. You use antidote to purify the already poisoned, let's say, body. But Tom was a part of the original unpoisoned Arda, and then poison (Melkor, Sauron) came, and then the antidote (Istari...) had to be used.
__________________
"Should the story say 'he ate bread,' the dramatic producer can only show 'a piece of bread' according to his taste or fancy, but the hearer of the story will think of bread in general and picture it in some form of his own." -On Fairy-Stories |
08-16-2009, 01:55 PM | #219 | |
Flame Imperishable
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Right here
Posts: 3,928
|
Quote:
__________________
Welcome to the Barrow Do-owns Forum / Such a lovely place
|
|
08-17-2009, 11:17 AM | #220 |
Wight
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 120
|
I don't normally get involved in Bombadil threads, but I think we can rule out a few possibilities just by asking the author. He did say quite a lot about what Bombadil is not:
Letter 144, written in 1954: "He has not connexion in my mind with the Entwives", "...only the Victory of the West will allow Bombadil to continue, or even to survive. Nothing would be left for him in the world of Sauron." He says that if you have no interest in power or control then "the questions of the rights and wrongs of power and control" have no meaning to you. "It is a natural pacifist view". Letter 153, also written in 1954, in response to the claim the Bombadil is God/Eru because Goldberry says "He is": "...I really do think you are being too serious ... Frodo has asked not 'What is Tom Bombadil' but 'Who is he' .... Goldberry gives what I think is the correct answer... Goldberry and Tom are referring to the mystery of names." In other words you can only explain who Tom Bombadil is by the statement "He is Tom Bombadil". He is the one and only Tom Bombadil. As Tom asks Frodo, "Don't you know my name yet? That's the only answer. Who are you, alone, yourself and nameless?" So, Tolkien implicitly rejects that Tom is Eru and hints that he is really in a class of his own. As for the suggestion that Tom is Tolkien himself, or the reader, well that really is unhelpful. Besides, Tolkien said the character he mosts identifies with is Faramir - see, for example Letter 180; both the comment that Faramir shares Tolkien's dream of the "Giant Wave" and also his footnote, "As far as any character is 'like me' it is Faramir". So from the author's own words... Bombadil is not: - The author. - God - An ent or entwife. Bombadil is: - One of a kind. - A 'natural pacifist'. He does not get involved or seem to be concerned about events in the outside world. - Eldest. He was there before anything else. So, we also know that he is not mortal, for he seemingly has lived for as long as middle-earth itself. Also, he does not disappear when he wears the Ring ... this is only true for immortals. Therefore he can't be some kind of strange man or hobbit. In the story his function seems to be to show that the Ring has no effect on someone with no interest in power and control. Thus, even Frodo and Bilbo do have, at least in some measure, some hidden desire for power and control. There has to be something inside you that the Ring can work on. Insofar as he can be compared to any character, I would say that he is the anti-Melkor. Whereas Melkor from the very beginning wished to impose his own will on things, and this desire (when denied) became an impulse to ruin everything and oppress everyone, Tom has no personal interest whatsoever in controlling anything. Tom, of course, cannot oppose someone like Melkor or Sauron in any meaningful way, because he does not wield power in the way that they do. So when I say he is the anti-Melkor I don't mean that he is 'equal' to Melkor (or the 'antidote' to Melkor) because to be Melkor's true opposite means he cannot oppose evil. Indeed, in general he is oblivious to it. That isn't to say that Tom is powerless ... indeed he is 'Master' of his own little land ... he has profound influence through his 'songs' ... but he has no "personal interest" in power. He does not use power to enhance his standing or boost his ego. One interesting thing to notice is that Tom does say "his songs are stronger". He does seem to maintain order in his land through his songs. It's hard not to be reminded of the Music of Eru at this moment, as Tom's songs seem to have some kind of deep influence on reality. This doesn't mean that Tom is Eru, just that he knows the Music! I seem to recall reading a theory that Tom actually is a manifestation of the Music brought to life as a conscious being. A spirit of the Music, if you like. |
08-17-2009, 11:51 AM | #221 | |||
Gruesome Spectre
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Heaven's doorstep
Posts: 8,037
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
'Outside', to me must mean the Void, and Tom is claiming to have entered Arda before Melkor. Tom's allegiance, similar to Ungoliant, appears to be to himself, with the difference that he is not malevolent.
__________________
Music alone proves the existence of God. |
|||
08-17-2009, 12:09 PM | #222 | |
Wight
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 120
|
Quote:
|
|
09-26-2009, 01:59 PM | #223 |
Pile O'Bones
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Cameth Brin ("The Twisted Hill")
Posts: 21
|
I think it most likely that Tom is a Melian-like being. However, he is deeply in touch with the Earth and nothing else really - kind of like uber Radagast. Tom is a traditional woodland spirit out of mythology and his wife is a fairy - perhaps an intrusion or throwback to concepts featured The Book of Lost Tales. This helps to explain Tom's actions visa vi the One Ring. He is so enamored with the green things and growing things, like the extrapolation of Hobbitness, that he does not desire power over others and therefore the Ring cannot sway him or even make him invisible. Tolkien's ultimate fantasy may have been a Wizard Hobbit - it certainly is a great combination.
Last edited by Rhugga II; 10-20-2009 at 01:36 AM. Reason: Response to new thought |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|