Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
08-18-2006, 10:11 PM | #1 |
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 252
|
Arwen's Mortality
Was Arwens choice between mortality and immortality due to her history or the ring? As in, if her father wasnt Elrond and she was a regular elf, would she be immortal still if she stayed? Or would she be mortal (ie, every elf would be mortal) becaue the age of men came and the rings' power faded and eventually ended?
|
08-21-2006, 12:06 AM | #2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Arwen was able to choose to give up her Immortality because she was a Half-elf, and they were given a choice as to which fate would be their's. This was indeed because her father was a Half-elf, since his parents were Eärendil and Elwing who were both Half-elven. (Eärendil's father, Tuor, was a Man, and his mother, Idril, was a Noldorin Elf)
Would all Elves have become Mortal? No, I don't think that's possible, since death was Eru's gift to Mortals (Men, Dwarves, etc.) and the Elves could never really have it. Even when they died, it wasn't the same as when a Mortal did. The exception is of course Lúthien, who managed to convince Ilúvatar Himself to let her live another life with Beren as a Mortal. Hope that made sense, and I hope I understood what you were saying. |
08-21-2006, 11:40 AM | #3 |
A Northern Soul
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Valinor
Posts: 1,847
|
Elnimara is correct. Staying in Middle-earth into the Fourth Age would not automatically transform elves into mortal beings.
Elrond's half-elven family was given the choice - Elrond, his parents, and his brother. It was granted to them for Earendil and Elwing's heroic acts against Morgoth. Because Elrond married a full elf, Celebrian, the choice was also extended to his children by her. Arwen and her brothers, Elrohir and Elladan, all had to make the decision (and they were supposed to do so before or shortly after Elrond left Middle-earth). This choice had nothing to do with the One Ring. Peter Jackson may have made it sound so in the movie, but I think it was taken more literally than he intended. Many understood it to imply Arwen's life was magically tied to the Ring somehow. It's Elrond that says something like her fate is tied to it, isn't it? He means it in a logical/emotional way - not some binding, magical way. If the Ring is destroyed, she will stay with Aragorn. If the Ring is not destroyed, she has no reason to stay as Middle-earth will be overtaken by evil and Aragorn will die shortly.
__________________
...take counsel with thyself, and remember who and what thou art. |
08-21-2006, 08:20 PM | #4 |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: In hospitals, call rooms and (rarely) my apartment.
Posts: 1,538
|
Now, quick question, I can't really give many reasons for it nor to explain too much as it is rather simple.
Why then didn't Aragorn, also a descendant from a half-elf get to choose? or if not Aragorn, as he was far too removed, why not the first few kings of Numenor?
__________________
I prepared Explosive Runes this morning. |
08-21-2006, 09:29 PM | #5 |
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Washington, D. C., USA
Posts: 299
|
I think, once Elros chose mortality, and married a mortal, it was simply two mortals, so all their children would also be mortals. That's why his offspring did not get a choice. They were already mortal. After all, as I recall, it was not really a choice of being mortal or not. It was a choice as to which kindred they would belong to, elves or men. The mortality/immortality perk simply went along with that real choice, the Gift of Men, or the immortality of the Elves.
__________________
But all the while I sit and think of times there were before, I listen for returning feet and voices at the door. |
08-22-2006, 04:42 AM | #6 | |
Pile O'Bones
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 11
|
One thing i also think that Peter Jackson mis interpreted, or didn't accentuate enough concerning Arwen is that she made the choice to become mortal to her fathers heavy disgreement! In the movies he implied that she would die and that was somehow connected to the ring, and i agree with your description / analysis of the situation Legolas.
In the books Elronds' aggreivance with Arwens choice is more pronounced; Quote:
But yes... the choice to become mortal was only ever given to the 'Peredhil' (a term i believe was only ever applied to Elros and Elrond) but means half-elven therefore includes Dior etc etc etc, although no-one else seemed to 'make' the choice except Elros, Elrond and Elronds children. This means that when the choice is not conciously made the decendant of Immortal and Mortal appears to automatically be Immortal? As a result; Arwens death (and the inability of the other half-elven to have children with a mortal as they are no longer in ME) signifies the end of the half-elven in middle-earth! Although the most noble blood line to ever exist continues still in both Middle-Earth and Aman!
__________________
for Sauron took to himself the name of Annatar; the Lord of Gifts |
|
08-22-2006, 05:16 AM | #7 |
Spectre of Decay
|
Elrond Halfelven: Father-in-law from Hell
I think that in this case 'bitter' means that their separation was bitter to both of them, not that it created bitterness between them. In the book, Elrond is far more resigned to his daughter's choice, although he does make it a condition of Arwen's marriage that Aragorn should take up his inheritance and reunite Arnor and Gondor.
The point is that the decision is Arwen's to make. Elrond knows better than to make it for her, however painful their parting may be for him. Tolkien repeatedly points out that it's just as difficult to do the right thing as it is to know what the right thing is, and Elrond, Arwen and Aragorn are old and wise enough to do what must be done and endure what must be endured without complaint. I think that certain interpreters have missed that point. The clumsy attempts of film-Elrond to prevent a match of which he had been aware for decades would eventually prove futile and only make his parting from Arwen all the more bitter. Elrond can hardly be expected to be overjoyed at losing his daughter forever, but Tolkien's character has the wisdom and nobility to give in gracefully. Such behaviour goes against the grain of human nature, but I hope that it's still not entirely incomprehensible.
__________________
Man kenuva métim' andúne? |
08-22-2006, 07:46 PM | #8 | ||
A Northern Soul
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Valinor
Posts: 1,847
|
Quote:
As I said, "because Elrond married a full elf, Celebrian, the choice was also extended to his children by her." Elladan, Elrohir, and Arwen had new immortal blood. That's how Tolkien explains it in Letter No. 153. Quote:
__________________
...take counsel with thyself, and remember who and what thou art. |
||
08-23-2006, 09:01 AM | #9 | |
Eagle of the Star
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sarmisegethuza
Posts: 1,058
|
Quote:
|
|
08-26-2006, 04:36 AM | #10 | |
Shady She-Penguin
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In a far land beyond the Sea
Posts: 8,093
|
Quote:
__________________
Like the stars chase the sun, over the glowing hill I will conquer Blood is running deep, some things never sleep Double Fenris
|
|
08-27-2006, 12:00 AM | #11 | |
Haunting Spirit
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: At The Golden Perch enjoying the best pint in the East Farthing!
Posts: 68
|
Quote:
I don't think that elves and dwarves would ever get together like that. I think the elves thought the dwarves were too...hm,.....uncouth I guess you would say. As for the hobbits I believe that it is said that Frodo had an elvish look about him and that one of his ancestors might have been a fairy or elf. Logistically I don't think a hobbit and an elf could get together, if you get my meaning as Sam would say. After all hobbits are pretty short.
__________________
YOU shall not pass!! Even the smallest person can change the course of the future... Last edited by Alchisiel; 08-27-2006 at 12:15 AM. |
|
08-31-2006, 07:12 AM | #12 |
Pile O'Bones
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 16
|
Many people mistakenly think that Elrond and the long line of Numenorean Kings has a blood of a two kindred (Elves and Men). Actually it was Three. people tend to forget that Luthien mother, Melian, is a Maia just like Sauron.
|
08-31-2006, 07:31 PM | #13 |
Pile O'Bones
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 16
|
There is other union of Men and Elf besides Beren, Tuor and Aragorn. Remember Imrazor the Numenorean, father of Galador, first Prince of Dol Amroth? Legend has it that he wedded Mithrellas, an elven maid that he found wandering in the wild. what happen to mithrellas do you think?
|
09-01-2006, 05:16 AM | #14 | |
Wight
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Barad-Dur
Posts: 196
|
Quote:
As I understand it the choice was given to the sons of Earendil and Elwing, who were Elros and Elrond. There was no question of Elros or his descendants having the option to become immortal at some later stage - if there had been , the downfall of Numenor would never have happened . Elrond's choice meant his children were Elven . Arwen's was the " choice of Luthien " , which was a different matter altogether . I am the Mouth of Sauron . |
|
09-01-2006, 06:12 AM | #15 | |
Fading Fëanorion
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: into the flood again
Posts: 2,911
|
Quote:
First I thought that Elrond's and Elros' situations are symmetric. Elrond chose to be an elf. Then he marries an elf. My logic told me that normally elf+elf=elf. Elros chose to be mortal. Then he marries a mortal woman. Why didn't their children get to choose with a renewed mortal strain? (which was also Farael's question, I think) I think it is stated in 'Laws and Customs', that if mortal and immortal blood is mixed, the outcome is always mortal. So Earendil and Dior and his children were mortal half-elves in the beginning. Then the Valar had the brilliant idea to let Earendil and Elwing and their children choose between the fates of elves and men. Does this now mean exactly that, that Elrond and Elros chose their different fates, but they still remain half-elves nonetheless and don't actually become Elf or Man? If this is the case, then it is clear: Elrond's and Elros' children would always be mortal - unless new immortal blood comes into play. This renewed elvish strain via Celebrían then seems sufficient reason to give Elrond's children a choice, too. Do I understand it right? |
|
09-04-2006, 12:58 PM | #16 | |
Haunting Spirit
|
I've also been thinking about this difficulty of the 'renewed elvish strain'. Macalaure's explanation may fit well (and is well, too), but could that be? Every child of an "Elvish-Half-Elven" is mortal?
I don't think so. Tolkien marks the choice is irrevocable (Letter #153). That sounds like the choice is binding in all ways. Another point is the following quote also from Letter #153: Quote:
Somehow the whole thing seems not clear for me.
__________________
„I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve." |
|
09-07-2006, 10:10 AM | #17 |
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 252
|
I think Macalaure's idea is the only plausible argument. Otherwise, the children of two elfs would be elvish, and the children of two humans would be human. That wouldn't make sense at all, becuase then Elros' children would be allowed to choose.
|
09-09-2006, 09:04 AM | #18 | ||||
A Northern Soul
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Valinor
Posts: 1,847
|
Manwe did declare previously that any being with any mortal blood would be mortal. This means Dior would've been mortal.
Quote:
Source for that 'stipulation' is Appendix A in Lord of the Rings: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
...take counsel with thyself, and remember who and what thou art. |
||||
09-12-2006, 05:59 PM | #19 |
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 252
|
I still feel like it wasn't thought out enough. So at first i guess we decided they had to choose (and that wasnt even clear), but now that its decided by Elronds staying or leaving?
|
09-12-2006, 08:30 PM | #20 | ||
A Northern Soul
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Valinor
Posts: 1,847
|
They had to choose for themselves. The choice would simply dictate the action. It was certain that Elrond would leave. His departure date was the tentative "deadline" for his children's choice, though we see that Elladan and Elrohir took a little longer to decide. Appendix A, Lord of the Rings:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
...take counsel with thyself, and remember who and what thou art. |
||
09-13-2006, 10:20 AM | #21 | ||
Eagle of the Star
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sarmisegethuza
Posts: 1,058
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
09-15-2006, 01:36 PM | #22 |
Haunting Spirit
|
Another question is bothering me. Tolkien made clear, that Elladan, Elrohir and Arwen had to make their choices. They could delay their choice, but not for forever. But what if they don't choose?
Until the end of the Third Age they have (seemingly) lived like Elves. They have owned the youth of the Eldar and didn't age like mortal men. But they weren't Elves, but Half-Elves. They could live like the Eldar for all the time and delay their choice and delay their choice and delay their choice, if there is no force to choose. But what if there don't choose? Or does their choice is bound to their behavior? I mean, could their choice can automatically derive from their decision to settle down in Middle-Earth or to leave Middle-Earth. The Elves are fading, the time of the Elves ends in Middle-Earth. Leaving Middle-Earth could only mean to choose to be among the Firstborn, but could staying mean to choose to be mortal?
__________________
„I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve." |
09-15-2006, 02:01 PM | #23 |
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Halls of Mandos
Posts: 332
|
Well, we simply don't know the answer. The only unknowns, when it's all said and done, are Elladan and Elrohir. Tolkien says in his Letters, and Legolas (the Downer, not the Elf) alluded to it, that just because they didn't go with Elrond, didn't mean they were choosing mortality. They merely delayed their choice.
I would guess that if they remained in M-E past a certain point, that they would indeed become mortal. But what would that point be? Perhaps after the last ship had departed the Havens? But that's mere speculation.
__________________
"If you're referring to the incident with the dragon, I was barely involved. All I did was give your uncle a little nudge out of the door." THE HOBBIT - IT'S COMING |
09-15-2006, 02:01 PM | #24 |
Eagle of the Star
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sarmisegethuza
Posts: 1,058
|
I was thinking about their choice this same day! Great minds think alike
I really wonder if there are some things that could invalidate such a choice; can you claim that you were drunk (or mad, or under spell, etc) when you made it and then have another go at it? is forced decision a reason to invalidate it? And if you can't invalidate it, can you at least get a second "life" in Middle-Earth, like Luthien & co? I have an evil feeling the answer to all this is no. |
09-16-2006, 09:15 AM | #25 |
Pile O'Bones
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 11
|
The whole point of the choice is that it is irrevocable. Elros was a Peredhil who chose to live as a mortal, albeit with a much extended life-span. Elrond chose to be among the immortal. The choice was then only extended into Elronds family. Why; because to choose the mortal path meant death in ME, to choose the immortal meant that at some point in time your life would continue in Aman, whether there was a time limit on your arrival in Aman is mere conjecture. The decision to become mortal is akin to the choice of Luthien; who chose to live a second life as a mortal and to die indeed, leaving the circles of the world forever.
__________________
for Sauron took to himself the name of Annatar; the Lord of Gifts |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|