Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
02-24-2006, 08:07 PM | #241 | |||
Laconic Loreman
|
Quote:
Sauce, if you find lmp pulling a wolfish blind over our eyes I will put my trust in you. But, being able to know where lmp is coming from I'm inclined to believe he is telling the truth. Of course, I would not put it pas lmp trying to trick us...but falling under heavy suspicion, when you know you are innocent, but everyone is attacking you...you just have the feeling of giving it up and not caring what happens to you. You just get the, ok go ahead and lynch me, you will all see your flawed ways when I'm innocent...I hope you get what I'm trying to say. Coming from lmp's situation before, you just get a sense of giving it up. So, that's I now find it hard to pull the platform from under him. It could very well be a clever wolvish trick, one I would not put past him of doing, but I certainly understand where he is coming from. Quote:
Quote:
Who I am suspicious of right now... Aiwendil: Farael has made some intriguing posts and I keep on coming back to the same thing I've noticed and others have noticed...Aiwendil's been cleverly getting us to look at lmp, without making a full commitment saying he's a wolf. Spawn and Eomer: When the game progresses and innocents are dying I suspect those that take a semi-vocal/leader role. You know they just seem so insightful, and willing to help, it's hard to suspect them, but it's hard not to when it's innocents getting lynched instead of wolves. The quiet ones are also falling into my suspiciouns. Glirdan, Kath, and Formendacil, anytime we start getting to where the quiet ones slip out of discussion and aren't mentioned I get worried. There is likely a wolf that is low key and is sort of cast-aside/forgotten about. The no-vote of Kath I have a hard time figuring out too. Yes, I know she wasn't around for a lot of the day, and she didn't want to make a random vote (perhaps she's got a different philosophy then me, but I always think everyone should vote). It looks wolfish because: 1. By staying out of voting she doesn't get her hands dirty in the lynching of an innocent. It looks innocent because: 1. Lhuna's fate was already sealed, so her vote wouldn't hold any difference in the outcome. 2. Wanting to make a logical vote, and not pull a name out of the air and vote, because of her absense. So if for my list right now: Aiwendil Spawn Eomer Kath
__________________
Fenris Penguin
|
|||
02-24-2006, 08:07 PM | #242 | |
Corpus Cacophonous
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A green and pleasant land
Posts: 8,390
|
Day 1 Lhuna voters (in order)
The Saucepan Man Eomer of the Rohirrim dancing spawn of ungoliant Well, I was wrong about Lhuna obviously. But she did look the most likely to be a Wolf to me at the time. Eomer drew her level on 2 votes with Gil-Galad, Glirdan and Boro. An understandable vote, perhaps, given that it was sensible to keep the voting tight, so as to make it difficult for the Wolves. But it could also have been a Wolfish attempt to put four innocents (assuming Glirdan and Boro are innocent) ahead in the voting. Dancing spawn put her on 3 votes, ahead of Boro, Glirdan and tar-ancalime (on 2 votes each), at a time when Gil was on 4 votes. Not sure what that tells us, but it could again have been aimed at promoting innocents as the main candidates for lynching. Day 2 Lhuna voters (in order) Glirdan Eomer of the Rohirrim Anguirel mormegil littlemanpoet I still think Glirdan's early first vote for Lhuna on Day 2 looks un-Wolfish. Lhuna attracted the third highest number of votes on Day 1 and was therefore a possible contender for lynching on Day 2 at the time Glirdan voted for her. An early vote can attract suspicion. An early vote for someone who is later lynched and proved innocent moreso. Conversely, therefore, I think that Glirdan's vote speaks in his favour. Eomer is the only villager to have voted twice for Lhuna and one of only three villagers to have voted twice for known innocents (Glirdan and morm are the others). So that immediately makes him look suspicious to me. Which makes me wonder whether a Wolf would have voted so riskily two Days running. Then again, an Eomer-Wolf would surely be a bold Wolf. Dancing spawn brought up some good points concerning Eomer yesterday and I think that it may be worth looking back over his posts and spawn's analysis of him. Anguirel was innocent although his vote, putting Lhuna ahead as it did, would otherwise have looked suspicious today. Now mormegil, like Eomer, has voted twice for known innocents and his vote for Lhuna put her 2 votes ahead of anyone else. So that all makes him look quite suspicious. However, there's not much else to go on at the moment on morm and I still have the feeling that, if lmp is a Wolf, morm is probably innocent. Littlemanpoet's vote was the one that sealed Lhuna's fate. Or was it? No, it wasn't. He voted last, at a time when Lhuna was on 4 votes and he was on 3. So Lhuna was already facing the gallows when he voted. Now, if lmp is a Wolf, why would he vote for an innocent who was guaranteed to be lynched? Why not place a "safe" vote elsewhere, or even a Wolf-on-Wolf vote? Quote:
So lmp remains my prime suspect. But, if there were two Wolves among the Lhuna votes, I have a feeling that Eomer might fit the bill.
__________________
Do you mind? I'm busy doing the fishstick. It's a very delicate state of mind! |
|
02-24-2006, 08:52 PM | #243 | ||
Corpus Cacophonous
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A green and pleasant land
Posts: 8,390
|
Quote:
I realise that, in my analysis of lmp's vote for Lhuna, I did not take account of the fact that Kath could yet have voted. however, it would have made no difference. Lhuna's fate was sealed by the time lmp voted for her. Quote:
And while Farael's posts may be intriguing as far as Aiwendil is concerned, they have not exactly been helpful in many other respects. He has focussed almost entirely on one villager. There are (currently) 13 other villagers, and three Wolves on the loose. It seems to me that he would better serve the village by looking for all of them, not just the one that he thinks he has found. Indeed, the more I think about it, the more I think that it would be a fairly sensible Wolfish tactic to concentrate on one target, for that way he does not risk incriminating his Wolfish colleagues and avoids incriminating himself when innocents are lynched. His single-minded pursuit of Aiwendil has enabled him to avoid much suspicion to date and seemingly rather given him a cloak of innocence. Of course, he will look bad if Aiwendil is lynched and found to be innocent, but perhaps it is intended that he will then serve as a sacrifice to cover his fellows. Now, I need to take a look at Eomer. I am not going to be around much tomorrow, so I want to collect my thoughts tonight as much as I can.
__________________
Do you mind? I'm busy doing the fishstick. It's a very delicate state of mind! |
||
02-24-2006, 09:11 PM | #244 | ||
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: abaft the beam
Posts: 303
|
Quote:
That's what I've thought since Day 1. (Really! What, you don't believe me? ) Farael's accusations are either based on a refusal to understand Aiwendil's sometimes subtle reasoning and willingness to consider several viewpoints and shades of gray (which style, as I have found to my own detriment, can be taken as a refusal to commit to one line of thinking), or they are totally unfounded. Nothing about Aiwendil's posts has made me think "Wolf!" This is not to say, though, that I want to write off Aiwendil as innocent. He has me stymied; but Farael's crusade against him reflects much more poorly on the accuser than on the accused. Now, to dancing spawn. Remember Day 1? When I thought that long post was a little suspicious? I backed off, both because of her calm response and because it didn't bother anyone else. But now? Now? I'm starting to look back at it. She's successfully set up a little feud with Eomer, which led Boromir to post this: Quote:
I also don't want to overlook mormegil. He's been flying under the radar for the entire game. I have nothing more concrete than that, but he's making me nervous. I"m not ready to let up on Garin yet, either--he could easily be hiding behind his personality, hoping to slide by on "Oh, he's just being Garin." Where does this leave me? To be honest I'm at a loss. I haven't got any likely innocents at all--perhaps I'm becoming a little paranoid. I'm going to wait and see, while watching Farael, Eomer, and spawn very carefully. I'm going to think hard about lmp's sacrificial stance today (sacrificial la--er, wolf?) I'm going to continue to suspect Garin. And all of this while trying hard not to forget the rest of the village--as I said, I haven't seen anyhting that screams "innocent."
__________________
Having fun wolfing it to the bitter end, I see, gaur-ancalime (lmp, ww13) |
||
02-24-2006, 09:21 PM | #245 | |
Itinerant Songster
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Edge of Faerie
Posts: 7,066
|
Quote:
|
|
02-24-2006, 09:27 PM | #246 | |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: In hospitals, call rooms and (rarely) my apartment.
Posts: 1,538
|
Quote:
I have exposed my doubts on the Aiwendil-LMP situation. Aiwendil is quick to raise some suspicions and even quicker to exonerate him... which has me thinking is likely a well thought-out wolfish plan. What I find most intriguing is that he actually has some suspects (other than LMP) from which he demands answers... and yet any comments from LMP seem to erase his thoughts. Of course, we could be dealing with a very empathic innocent villager, but I think I have a plan to put forward It is still early and we are many innocents. Now is the time to take on risks, because the more we wait, the more difficult and costly it will be should we make a mistake. Now, I assume we all agree that LMP's behaviour has been far from easy to gauge. He will continue to be a distraction as days go on. I will leave it to others who have been paying closer attention to LMP to dig up information against him, if they feel like it, as I don't have time to do it myself right now. But given that my suspicions of Aiwendil are based mostly on his 'relationship' with LMP, today I would be in favour of lynching LMP. That would give me some information on Aiwendil and worst case scenario, we get rid of the most controversial villager so far. Yet I'm not saying let's condemn LMP just yet, I would appreciate it if someone (other than me) analised his behaviour. I dont have time to do it right now and I doubit I will have time tomorrow I realize you could think this as a response on those criticizing me for going after Aiwendil only but.... if you think about it, this would be an excelent way of digging up even more information about Aiwendil
__________________
I prepared Explosive Runes this morning. |
|
02-24-2006, 09:48 PM | #247 | |
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: abaft the beam
Posts: 303
|
Quote:
But the second half of your statement is, while a little cold-blooded, intriguing. Get rid of those people who are muddying things. Back on Day 1 lmp told me that too much clarity could only help the wolves to hide. I couldn't disagree with this more. I think that smokescreens and side arguments are perfect wolf hiding places. You're absolutely right that if we're going to take any risks (i.e. lynch someone we're not sure is a wolf), it's got to be today. I think the only defensible reason for doing something like this is to eliminate someone who's not contributing, who's generating confusion, or who seems to be obscuring things deliberately. Someone who's making it more difficult to find the wolves. The test wouldn't be "wolvish/non-wolvish;" it would be "useful/non-useful." I'm not sure I like this idea (is it yours or mine at this point?) enough to run with it all Day, still less if I like it enough to try to organize a lynching around it, but I'd like to put it out there: Is there anyone whose absence would make our job easier, regardless of whether or not they turn out to be innocent?
__________________
Having fun wolfing it to the bitter end, I see, gaur-ancalime (lmp, ww13) |
|
02-24-2006, 09:49 PM | #248 | |
Itinerant Songster
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Edge of Faerie
Posts: 7,066
|
Quote:
|
|
02-24-2006, 09:59 PM | #249 | |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: In hospitals, call rooms and (rarely) my apartment.
Posts: 1,538
|
Quote:
tar-ancalime, You started from my idea and moved a little in your own direction. Not that there is anything wrong with that. I don't think we should make it a policy to go after the useless folk, specially because as I argued before, wolves would just have to appear useful and they'd save their foul skins. Yet this time I think that LMP's death would be more useful than his life. If anything, he is mudding up the water, while it's almost heart-breaking to see him post the way he has, and almost giving up his own life for the sake of the village... I don't buy it. He might be a villager resigned to his fate(Eru knows it has happened to.... my soul in other incarnations) but his behaviour is very troublesome. From what I hear, he has the potential to be a very good contributor to the village and so far, he has only created controversy. I'm sorry LMP, but your death will clear the waters some And Tar-ancalime, I can't get Aiwendil lynched today, I haven't gained enough support... that's why I'm trying other tactics. Sort of like politics if you think about it. I can't get away with what I want so I'll compromise, support other ideologies if in turn it will help me gain support for mine. And if we find LMP to be one of those fiends, who will look at me in the eye and say Aiwendil is not?
__________________
I prepared Explosive Runes this morning. |
|
02-24-2006, 10:10 PM | #250 | ||||
Corpus Cacophonous
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A green and pleasant land
Posts: 8,390
|
I thought that dancing spawn had made some fine points about Eomer, and I was right. I addressed Eomer's votes above. Here's what else struck me on looking through his contributions.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
But why did you address that question specifically to me? Spawn noted that it seemed odd, and I am inclined to agree. Quote:
To be fair, he does accuse Farael (#178). And, while I agree with what he says, Farael was a fairly safe target, having largely been deemed innocent for his attack on Aiwendil. When spawn makes her case (#190), Eomer responds rather defensively (#193), pointing out the ways in which he claims to have helped the village. In fact, he has offered very little in the way of substance so far. He also tries to defuse her argument by drawing a difference between "suspicion" and "accusation", and later claims that he has suspected people (#200). Actually, Eomer, I would say that you have raised suspicions without really driving them home. All in all, Eomer is certainly beginning to look suspicious in my mind. And now tar-ancalime is seeing collusion between spawn and Eomer. Hmm, I'll have to think about that. But tomorrow. Right now, I'm whacked. PS I agree, Farael, that lynching lmp could be quite revealing. Quite possibly about Aiwendil, but also about mormegil, Boro (who has backed off from him today - I'm not discounting that possible Wolf-on-Wolf vote), and now quite possibly you too. I have already gone back over his posts myself and he looks pretty suspicious to me, but I don't have any time now to do a full analysis. I might have a chance tomorrow, but I can't promise anything. Or perhaps, given that I might otherwise be accused of trying to "influence" the village ( ), people should look back themselves and make up their own minds.
__________________
Do you mind? I'm busy doing the fishstick. It's a very delicate state of mind! |
||||
02-24-2006, 10:12 PM | #251 | |
Corpus Cacophonous
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A green and pleasant land
Posts: 8,390
|
Quote:
__________________
Do you mind? I'm busy doing the fishstick. It's a very delicate state of mind! |
|
02-24-2006, 10:50 PM | #252 | |
Laconic Loreman
|
Aiwendil, I think we always have to consider why someone like Sauce is still alive. The way I've always seen things (and debate with me if you like) why would the wolves kill someone who can be a big influence over the village if that person hasn't caught on to a wolf? Understand what I'm saying?
There's no reason for the wolves to kill someone like Sauce if he hasn't lynched a wolf yet. Once a wolf goes down then I would expect Sauce (or someone like him) to be a prime wolf kill at night. But, there's no reason for the wolves to kill an influential player, that knows innocents will be willing to trust his judgement if he/she hasn't found a wolf. Of course someone like Sauce who can be so influential (whether he intends to be or not) makes a scary wolf player. Quote:
One thing I will make clear though, before I depart again...Let's not turn this day into a lmp bandwagon voting (I'm speaking to you innocents out there). It tells us nothing if we have lmp accumulating a wide majority of the votes. By jumping onto the lmp train will only help the wolves and gives us no insight into today's voting.
__________________
Fenris Penguin
|
|
02-24-2006, 11:11 PM | #253 | ||
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
|
Farael wrote:
Quote:
Matters are a bit different toDAY. For again on DAY 2 LMP had a sudden change of heart near the end of the DAY - and one that brought him more into line with public opinion. Perhaps he's simply being suggestible. But LMP is clever, and I doubt that he would be so easily swayed. So toDAY, LMP is certainly one of my top suspects. I think that lynching him toDAY might not be a bad idea at all. (I suppose now you'll accuse me of flip-flopping . . .) Call me stubborn if you must, but Garin also still looks distinctly wolvish to me. He's voted for Boromir twice now, but with little apparent reason. The only clear charge against Boromir that I can gather from Garin's posts is that Boromir defended himself when Anguirel attacked him. Garin looks to me like a wolf trying to play it safe by going after a single victim. . . . which brings me to Farael. SPM has made a good point about him - namely, that what he's doing looks like an excellent tactic for a wolf. Pick a single target and go after him relentlessly. It would have several advantages for a wolf: 1. it's unexpected; 2. it will probably be deemed "bold" and perhaps "over-bold" (but is it really?); 3. the wolf thereby avoids getting engaged in any discussion outside his specific, chosen topic. Of course, Farael has backed off a bit toDAY and is now discussing other villagers. A "flip flop"? I would certainly be well within my rights to make the same charge against him that he made against me. But of course I don't think it's unreasonable to change your mind from time to time. I'll be interested to watch Farael now, though, and see how he fares when he's not just attacking me. My other suspect from yesterday was Formendacil. He still looks suspicious to me. He's been fairly quiet, which may mean he's trying to "fly under the radar". I do understand and sympathize, though, that he's not feeling well. I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt for the moment. The Saucepan Man wrote: Quote:
As for everyone else - I'm afraid I've spent far too much time examining the few that I suspect and far too little looking at everyone else. In particular, I want to go back and take a closer look at Spawn, Eomer, and Kath - about whom others have made some interesting points. To summarize, then, I'd say that my top suspects at this point are: LMP Garin And my not-so-top suspects (but suspects nonetheless) are: Formendacil Farael SPM Edit: crossed with Boromir |
||
02-24-2006, 11:15 PM | #254 | |
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ciudad de Lago del Sal
Posts: 331
|
Quote:
I'm inclined to always think you are an ordinary villager, but that could be a dangerous assumption.
__________________
I am a sick man ... I am a spiteful man. I am an unpleasant man. I think my liver is diseased. Fyodor Dostoevsky "Notes From the Underground" |
|
02-24-2006, 11:23 PM | #255 | |
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ciudad de Lago del Sal
Posts: 331
|
Quote:
If Boro ends up being innocent you are allowed to condemn me. Our dearly departed Anguirel suspected Boro on both days and only voted for Lhuna because Boro hadn't a chance of being lynched that day. You reasoning is very specious. If I was a wolf I wouldn't vote so early against someone who seems to have turned his gaze onto someone else and thusly raise his ire. Edit: I'm starting to regret I already voted, by the way. I just need to help someone move to a new apartment real-time tomorrow so I am not sure If I could get back at a later date. This might be the last you hear from me although I hope to put up a substantial post before then ... no promises. Moving is a very unpredictable thing. I know this is a strange edit but I might need to triple post if I can find the strength to stay up a little longer.
__________________
I am a sick man ... I am a spiteful man. I am an unpleasant man. I think my liver is diseased. Fyodor Dostoevsky "Notes From the Underground" Last edited by Garin; 02-24-2006 at 11:39 PM. |
|
02-24-2006, 11:46 PM | #256 |
Itinerant Songster
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Edge of Faerie
Posts: 7,066
|
I see SPM's post #250 addresses some of the same things I've been finding.
After having read through many, many posts, I've arrived at the following conclusions. The following individuals are clearly innocent based on their thoroughgoing contributions: Innocent: SPM Boromir Tar-ancalime Spawn Aiwendil The following individuals are probably innocent, based on their less than thoroughgoing contributions. Probably innocent: Celuien (reasoned and helpful - the seer issue is a red herring) Farael (forthright and trying to do his part) Formendacil (harder to say, but his defense for Day 1 voting seemed reasonable and persuasive) Glirdan (started to seem suspicious at first, but began to seem more helpful and contributing) Kath (on the strength of believing in me) Mormegil (I would have him on the 'clearly' list except that he accused for one person then voted for another on Day 2) That leaves three individuals about whom I have not been able to conclude clear or probable innocence: Suspicious: Garin Eomer Nilpaurion Felagund 1. Whom have the known innocents suspected besides each other? Lhunardawen: Garin, Tar-ancalime (2) Anguirel: Boromir (2) Holbytlas: Tar-ancalime (1) This was not as helpful as I had hoped. 2. Who has defended whom? ....are there any patterns? Celuien gives a reasoned defense of Aiwendil against Farael. The defenses are all reasoned. Not much help here. 3. Who has accused whom? .... are there any patterns? Yes. The primary pattern is that the werewolves have been able to avoid the spotlight because of all the accusations flying. The werewolves, I believe, have not accused anybody. Except for in one case: Spawn's post # 190, in which she sifts through Eomer's words, revealing a lot of dicey stuff. See point 9 below. 4. Who has voted for whom? .... any patterns? -Eomer's Day 1 vote for Lhuna came 2nd after the trusted SPM's; safe - meanwhile his reasoning is, shall we say, dubious. Eomer's Day 2 vote for Lhuna also came 2nd, after Glirdan's. -Garin's vote for Boromir was 3rd out of 4; as suspicious as possible, if anything can actually be told from such votes; by itself, it means little. Taken with other evidence, it helps to reveal Garin's possible furriness. -Nilp voted for Farael on Day 1. It is likely that one of the werewolves did cast the first and only vote for someone. On Day 2 Nilp voted for the innocent and now killed Anguirel. Having voted during the Day for the man you decide to kill that Night is perhaps a potentially costly mistake. 5. Who has suspected someone then backed off? Why? SPM is declaring in no uncertain terms that I'm a werewolf. If he fails to vote for me, he should be suspected. 6. Who has built up a case against someone then switched to vote for another? Mormegil built up a case against me on Day 2 then voted for the known innocent Lhuna. However, he has otherwise shown himself to be a helpful villager, contributing in his usual in depth fashion. 7. Who has tried to appear helpful without being? Eomer. See point 9. 8. Who is riding others' waves? No one enough, not even my three suspects, except perhaps in voting. 9. Who is playing both sides against the middle? -Garin, as I have described earlier. -Eomer: "I guess anything can be construed as wolvish." "Formy but probably not Formy." "Morm but probably not Morm; please explain, sir." See Spawn's post #190. 10. Who's choices for innocent and suspicious seem dubious? -SPM's and Celuien's suspicion of Tar's vote of Eomer seems a bit dubious. -Eomer's suspicions of Spawn, Tar, and Morm seem dubious ... to me; for those individuals seem reasonable, helpful, and innocent. -Glirdan's post # 130 looks rather suspicious, especially in retrospect. Lhuna is "Definitely at the top of my list." .... to lynch? That is my only suspicion against Glirdan. 11. Who asks questions the answers of which help the werewolves? Aiwendil in post # 7, question #1; answers to this question aid the werewolves in knowing what not to do. On the other hand, his other 2 points are good ones. 12. Who defends self too much? -Celuien's "joking" defense against Morm's random accusations, placing the eye of suspicion on tar & Ang (who is innocent) -Me. -Eomer's defense (in post # 205) against Spawn's accusation (#190) seems rather shrill. General observations. 1. Nilp is not suicidal; that in itself is suspicious! 2. Eomer's assertion that werewolves are going to be timid is mildly suspicious, and effectively countered by the innocent Anguirel. 3. SPM: "Nilpaurion Felagund: Most likely innocent, in my view. He knows why." What is this supposed to mean? 4. SPM's litmus test against "seer talk" is looking more and more arbitrary the further we get into this holocaust. (EDIT: sorry, just noticed this is duplicated by point # 8) 5. When people are accused/suspected by more than one fellow villager, the likelihood of "getting defensive" seems to increase exponentially with each additional suspector. This is human nature. We should be more suspicious of someone who is too smooth. 6. Aiwendil's suspicions of tar-ancalime call into question my general sense that she's trying to do her part as an innocent. I still think he's reading too much into her posts, because she has contributed solid discussion. 7. Boromir's post #113 is solid, very solid. We all would do well to 'textbook' it for the rest of this holocaust....except for his suspicions of me, of course. 8. It's looking clearer and clearer to me that the "seer" discussion as a litmus test is a red herring and should be treated as such, especially since I find those in Boro's post #116 list as the top suspects in that regard, not to be very suspicious at all. 9. Nilp's post # 123 analysis of Day 1 vote looks reasonable on the surface, but seems flimsy upon retrospect. 10. I have never found the voting record by itself to be a persuasive tool for judging guilt or innocence, at least not until very late in the game, because there are simply too many possible variables and reasons for a person to vote for someone else, especially those "most incriminating" votes. Frankly, it seems that SPM's public service to the rest of us is more a mind-game he does for the fun of it than being useful; how many times as he been accurate in his resulting suspicions based on those voting record deductions? 11. Why does Glirdan answer Aiwendil's questions on how to catch a werewolf so late? I think it was Spawn who suggested (rightly) that such a question (#1) is more help to the werewolves than the innocents. In Conclusion: I believe that the three who fall under my suspicious category are very likely our three werewolves. This has been by process of elimination, after reading all the way through to post #138, by which time I had arrived at my working hypothesis as to who was either clearly or probably innocent. That left three individuals unaccounted for. I was already rather familiar with Garin's posts, and Nilp's, but not Eomer's; so I went back and read his, and discovered a lot of the same points Spawn made. Last edited by littlemanpoet; 02-24-2006 at 11:54 PM. |
02-25-2006, 12:14 AM | #257 | |
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ciudad de Lago del Sal
Posts: 331
|
Quote:
I respect that Boromir has taken me off his suspicious list but that will definitely suit him when I am lynched and proven ordinary. I really want to give LpM benefit of the doubt but turning on someone who is definitely not going to vote for him today is rather transparent, Nice try Wolfie. I don't want to cast around anymore pronouncements without the proper documentation, I just know that one or two of my detractors is a wolf. I also know one or two of those ignoring me is a wolf--they don't want to get entwined if their wolf friends can rally the village against me. I suggest the village lynch littlemanpoet who seemed anti-Boromir until the bluff failed. I might be awake a liitle bit more, we'll see.
__________________
I am a sick man ... I am a spiteful man. I am an unpleasant man. I think my liver is diseased. Fyodor Dostoevsky "Notes From the Underground" |
|
02-25-2006, 12:39 AM | #258 | ||
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: abaft the beam
Posts: 303
|
now wait just a cotton-pickin' minute
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Having fun wolfing it to the bitter end, I see, gaur-ancalime (lmp, ww13) |
||
02-25-2006, 12:48 AM | #259 | |
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ciudad de Lago del Sal
Posts: 331
|
Quote:
EDIT: spelling
__________________
I am a sick man ... I am a spiteful man. I am an unpleasant man. I think my liver is diseased. Fyodor Dostoevsky "Notes From the Underground" Last edited by Garin; 02-25-2006 at 12:57 AM. |
|
02-25-2006, 02:38 AM | #260 | |||||
Maundering Mage
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,648
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Now having said that I would like to address the ridiculous question of 'why is SpM still here'. Realize old friend that what I say I do so with the highest respect to you. But what makes SpM so great? Why should the wolves kill him so soon? He's intelligent, yes but is he infallible? No of course not. He is often wrong, as am I. He's a mover and shaker, if you'll forgive the expression, but I weary of the tedious question of why he and some others make it past night 1. Could he be a wolf, yes of course but just because he has survived doesn't make him one. There are many that are equally intelligent but aren't questioned as to why they are still alive. I believe, that wolves might leave him around knowing that this insane question will inevitably be asked. Now if we have no actual evidence against SpM let's drop it. Disclaimer I am not defending SpM, per se, what I am doing is trying to dispel the tired notion that any longevity in SpM equals Lupinity (is that a word?) But honestly I've seen nothing out of the ordinary from him at all. Quote:
Now of course I could be wrong but I think I've nailed at least two wolves in this scheme and will not back down today. Quote:
++LMP While I suspect him to be a wolf I think that if he is innocent, which is improbable, his death will tell us much more. Remember that if there is a tie it better be LMP who reaches the vote count first.
__________________
“I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo. "So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us.” |
|||||
02-25-2006, 03:06 AM | #261 | ||
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: abaft the beam
Posts: 303
|
Quote:
Care to comment, either SPM or Nilpaurion?
__________________
Having fun wolfing it to the bitter end, I see, gaur-ancalime (lmp, ww13) |
||
02-25-2006, 03:53 AM | #262 |
Mischievous Candle
|
I'm in a haste, so I'll say only a few things now.
1) No summary today. You talk so much that I have hard time keeping up anyway, and I can't be around toDay as much as I had hoped. Yes, pretty convenient, you think, for me to disappear just when people are getting suspicious of me, but my weekends just are like that. 2) Nilp is innocent. 3) The way Eomer responded to my accusations (or is it suspicions?) looked even more wolvish to me, and I shall come back to analyse that as soon as I can. 4) I think it's generally a good idea to look at those toDay, who have avoided the spotlight thus far.
__________________
Fenris Wolf
|
02-25-2006, 06:41 AM | #263 | |
Energetic Essence
|
Oh dear!! Ang is dead! Everyone who enjoys my music is being killed off one by one.
I must answer one short thing that Lmp has asked abaout me already: Quote:
All I have to say is that I am greatly confused at the moment. I shall be back later after a more thorough analysis of the posts toDay.
__________________
I'm going to buy you a kitty, I'm going to let you fall in love with the kitty, and one cold, winter night, I'm going to steal into your house and punch you in the face! Fenris Wolf
|
|
02-25-2006, 07:33 AM | #264 |
Mischievous Candle
|
Eomer is still looking wolvish to me, and because my time is rather limited toDay, I must just complete my case against him instead of taking a wider look at the village which is a pity. Well, anyway:
#193 - Eomer's first reactions to my case. He's appearing friendly... "Thanks for the analysis, spawn, because it makes me look pretty good! " ... and seems to be trying to disregard the points I made of him. "I don't think I've been the least helpful person here, as has been reinforced by a couple of other villagers (whom I thank)." If some other villagers think that Eomer is helpful, it means that I can't suspect him of being a werewolf? Then he asks me to check out the differences between suspecting and accusing. "Anyway, a good post nonetheless; and I certainly won't ask people to stop asking questions of me. It's about time someone queried me. " ~Eomer Well, looks more like a fake smile to me, because this is what happens when I go on and say that I might vote for him: #200 - "To put it bluntly: I have suspected people, so to suspect me on the basis of not suspecting is totally contrived and false." Eomer is taking attention away from the essence of my theory by clinging to his belief that I've confused the words 'suspect' and 'accuse'. Just because of that, he tries to say that my whole theory is totally contrived and false. #205 - "I'm very confident I could insert the names of many other villagers in place of Eomer in her analysis and end up with a similar result." Actually, I can't think of any and that's why I wanted to analyse him in the first place. Can you, Eomer, give me an example? "I hope to quiz you on that tomorrow, Spawn, because I think there's a bit of selectivity in your choice of target today." What's this, then? Something that begins with the word 'knee' and ends with the word 'jerk'? I thought I was welcome to question you... my mistake. "Has anyone investigated you yet?" Not much, really. I remember you saying earlier that maybe tar-a and I might be worth keeping an eye on, but you left it at that. I'm also concerned of tar-ancalime. As Nilp said, her vote for Eomer might have been a wolf voting for another. She is excellent at wiggling herself out of tricky situations (like the flip-flop accusation) and that's why I'm still worried. I also disagree with Sauce on the significance of Holby's vote in this matter. If tar-a is a wolf, maybe she got scared that Holby was the Seer and had dreamed of her and the wolves wanted to take her out before she could dream more. Nightly kills aren't always frame-ups. However, I don't have time for analysing her toDay, so that's it about her. I'll be back at least to vote (most likely for Eomer), but I try to come to talk with you before that if I only can.
__________________
Fenris Wolf
|
02-25-2006, 07:48 AM | #265 |
Auspicious Wraith
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 4,859
|
Messy argumentative post coming up
I'm surprised. I really am. I will do my best to respond to the suspicion placed on me today. I will say that it's funny how only one person really suspected me in the first two days and then — overnight — many villagers are mentioning my name.
About Lhuna: I was wrong. I thought there was a good chance that she was a wolf, and I was wrong. The whole Oh Glirdan! You're probably innocent but what can I do? act appeared very wolvish to me. I was just as wrong as several villagers; it just so happens that my target's identity was revealed before theirs. SPM follows Spawn's lead and makes a case against me (I wonder if this was arranged last night). He mentions that my suggestion that wolves will be slightly 'timid' and 'extremely friendly' was worrying, as it's problematic to assume wolf-categories. I agree with this, but neither Spawn nor SPM point out that I said Please debate with me in that post. Day One — let's get talking, please! It was hardly the cleverest post but I don't think it's worth all this bother. Re. Addressing the question of unity between Tar and Spawn to SPM: SPM had previously said that Tar's random vote for me was odd, especially considering her suspicion of Spawn. I addressed it to SPM because I thought he'd be the villager most likely to care and respond (which he did, eventually). About my supposed 'mild suspicions' of Formendacil and Mormegil: I was (and I know I'll be jeered for saying this) trying to be helpful. Yes, that's right. I was trying to be a help to the village. You see, while a lot of people are going crazy and throwing around rash accusations hither and thither around LMP, Boromir88, Garin, etc. I've been staying out of that mess and looking at the slightly less obvious villagers. I do see how that can be seen as wolvish, think that if you will; but I will absolutely not apologise for not screaming accusations. I raise suspicion without 'pressing it home'? I'm sorry but I do not understand what's being asked of me here. My main target for the first two days was Lhuna. I was content with my target then, and happy enough to question others. Today, though, I do have a new target. Oh yes, I wonder if you can guess who it is... Farael was a safe target? Blimey. You suggest a new way of looking at things and you get people jumping at your throat. I guess that's Werewolf for you. The most wolvish thing about me was indeed my shrill defence at Spawn's accusation. That's just the way I am, though. I can't help but come across as a bit of a *insert obscenity here* when playing this game. One more point, and this is something I resent highly. This continued allegation that I am being unhelpful. What exactly can I say to that? Have I caught a wolf? No. So, in that way, I guess you could say that I haven't offered great help to this poor village. So, at the risk of sounding sarcastic, I urge all villagers to flock to the exceedingly helpful dancing spawn of ungoliant and trust to her judgment; considering how very helpful she has been to you all. Again, I can't help but come across as annoying, pedantic and exasperated when I defend myself. But this wave of suspicion has me somewhat perplexed. More soon.
__________________
Los Ingobernables de Harlond |
02-25-2006, 07:52 AM | #266 | ||||||
Corpus Cacophonous
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A green and pleasant land
Posts: 8,390
|
I haven't got a lot of time, so just a quick response to some points that have been raised for now.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Back later with my thoughts on everyone.
__________________
Do you mind? I'm busy doing the fishstick. It's a very delicate state of mind! |
||||||
02-25-2006, 08:07 AM | #267 |
Auspicious Wraith
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 4,859
|
All you have, Spawn, is the 'feel' of my posts, and I can hardly argue against that. However:
Trying to disregard your points? No: I have answered them all (I think). 'If other villagers think Eomer is helpful it means I can't suspect him?' Um, what? What are you talking about? Classic example of taking anything I say and twisting it to make me look bad. Other villagers have said that I've made a couple of good points: that's fact. Why are you trying to make this look as if I'm shoving you away? I welcomed your questioning. Fake smile? Whatever. I'm one of the more excessive smiley users on the Barrowdowns. Difference between suspicion and accusation, does this block the essence of your theory? The 'essence of your theory' Spawn, is that I haven't really suspected anyone. I answer this by saying that I have only accused one person (Lhuna) but have suspected others. This is the entire crux of the matter. Your theory rests on that point because it is the major point — the essence of the theory, if you will. That is why it is contrived and false. Yes it has a couple of attractive whistles and bells, but the theory itself is contrived. About saying that there was 'selectivity in your choice of target', that was a clumsy way of saying that you could have made such accusations about a number of villagers. Which I hold to, and I will post evidence later today. Spawn, how's this for knee-jerk? I think I'll be voting for you today. Hopefully we can at least dispell this theory that you and I are working together. Why will I vote for you? Think of the word 'hypocrisy', and also consider what effect your rather weak case against me has had today. Oh my Lord, he's so shrill.
__________________
Los Ingobernables de Harlond |
02-25-2006, 08:19 AM | #268 | |||
Itinerant Songster
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Edge of Faerie
Posts: 7,066
|
Quote:
This game is cooked. I want out. Please vote for me. ++littlemanpoet |
|||
02-25-2006, 08:27 AM | #269 | |
Laconic Loreman
|
Quote:
Backing away from suspicions from someone isn't a flip-flop here, you're bound to go back and forth through Werewolf. It's the reversals of going a long with public opinion that I think is flip-flopping and most suspicious. Not because you are able to understand the reasoning of your "suspected/accused" person(s) and therefor don't see them as suspicious as you at first did. Being tunnel-visioned (:ahem: Garin ) and going after a soul person until he is lynched is something that I've never embraced....But I guess we all bring our own ways of doing things, which makes it of course interesting. Garin, I will say, with your suspiciouns, you are way off track and it will only hurt the village if you are indeed an innocent villager because if I'm lynched (not saying I particularly feel I will) you will probably be lynched the day after.
__________________
Fenris Penguin
|
|
02-25-2006, 08:34 AM | #270 | |
Laconic Loreman
|
Quote:
Edit: I've come to the conclusion that either Spawn or Eomer are probably another wolf in crime. The wolves yesterday would have to know that lmp would be facing death today. I doubt Eomer and Spawn are both wolves, playing this team of just accusing eachother back and forth, but there may be one wolf in there playing a long to get attention away from lmp. (IF lmp turns out to be a wolf I will certainly be taking this into deeper consideration).
__________________
Fenris Penguin
Last edited by Boromir88; 02-25-2006 at 08:41 AM. |
|
02-25-2006, 08:45 AM | #271 |
Auspicious Wraith
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 4,859
|
The hypocrisy of the lady Spawnowen
Yes, that's right: thy noble ancestor, forever beloved by the house of Eomer, would be ashamed of you.
#41- Big long list of what's happened so far. Mildly suspects Celuien. *Spawn suspected Eomer on basis of his mild suspicion* #57- Midly suspects Lhuna. *Spawn suspected Eomer on basis of his mild suspicion* #85- Thinks there are good points against Aiwendil and tar-ancalime....but they don't look very suspicious. *Spawn suspected Eomer on basis of his mild suspicion and then taking it back* #94 (and #41)- She puts on the helpful villager cloak, expresses her disdain for all the Seer talk, and urges her fellows to find the wolves. *Spawn suspected Eomer for appearing helpful* -She votes for Lhuna. (Funnily enough, like Eomer.) #177- Mildly suspects Glirdan. *Spawn suspected Eomer on basis of his mild suspicion. #179- Laments the wasted Seer talk. Let's find wolves= be helpful! *Spawn suspected Eomer for appearing helpful* -Begins suspicion of Eomer. That's pretty much what her game was up until she began to suspect me. It is quite funny how similarly we were playing, Spawn. Now, and here's the important bit, there's nothing suspicious in what Spawn did there! Her very strong attack on me for doing something very similar to what she was doing is positively laced with hypocrisy. Now, from the One yesterday, we have: Saucepan Man and littlemanpoet channeling her thoughts, and Mormegil. Actually, Mormegil I am less worried about because I merely seem to fit into his scheme. However, it is the other two I am concerned about. I believe that littlemanpoet is a wolf, regardless. I have been following all discussion though I haven't commented on all of it. Actually, I might have to vote for him today anyway to save my own neck. Lucky Spawn. Without a vote for you today I'm not sure many other villagers will give my arguments against you time. But there are a few days left in this village yet. There's a distinct possibility that Spawn is not a wolf; but her hypocrisy and SPM's repetition of her points has me worried.
__________________
Los Ingobernables de Harlond |
02-25-2006, 08:51 AM | #272 |
Itinerant Songster
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Edge of Faerie
Posts: 7,066
|
I'm a werewolf. Lynch me.
|
02-25-2006, 08:56 AM | #273 |
Auspicious Wraith
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 4,859
|
Ok, I might not be back later.
LMP supposedly wants to die, and the village does not want him around. I had thought he was a likely wolf especially after that first post today but his last post with his vote for himself has me doubting somewhat. This would turn out to be the greatest bluff in Werewolf history if he's let off. He won't be though. In any case, I fear receiving a few votes today and I certainly don't want to die. ++LITTLEMANPOET Even if he is a wolf it appears that I'll be suspected for that vote. Spawn, you still have a chance to avoid my vote tomorrow but you are going to have to meet that charge of hypocrisy, which I think is very pertinent.
__________________
Los Ingobernables de Harlond |
02-25-2006, 09:09 AM | #274 |
Energetic Essence
|
Grrrr!!! I'm such a confused villager!!! I really don't know what to think of that vote. It seems awfully Nilpish, yet I don't think Lmp would do something that drastic. It's just not his style. Mind you, it could very well be that he's a Wolf and by him telling us he's a Wolf, he thought that he could pull it off and make us not vote for him or he's a Wolf and very suicidal. I don't know what to do....
__________________
I'm going to buy you a kitty, I'm going to let you fall in love with the kitty, and one cold, winter night, I'm going to steal into your house and punch you in the face! Fenris Wolf
|
02-25-2006, 09:18 AM | #275 |
Everlasting Whiteness
|
Quite honestly I think lmp voted for himself because, whether he is a wolf or an innocent, he is thoroughly disgusted with the way SPM and Nilp, and to some extent Lhuna, behaved at the beginning of the game, and I'm not sure that I disagree.
Basically that is cheating.
__________________
“If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world.” |
02-25-2006, 09:19 AM | #276 | |
Itinerant Songster
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Edge of Faerie
Posts: 7,066
|
Quote:
And thank you, Eomer. |
|
02-25-2006, 09:19 AM | #277 | |
Maundering Mage
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,648
|
Quote:
As for me I wouldn't recommend doing it but...Meh.
__________________
“I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo. "So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us.” |
|
02-25-2006, 09:23 AM | #278 | |
Laconic Loreman
|
Quote:
__________________
Fenris Penguin
|
|
02-25-2006, 09:24 AM | #279 | |
Itinerant Songster
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Edge of Faerie
Posts: 7,066
|
Quote:
And it also happens to generate extracurricular discussions like this, which I could be doing after the game on the main thread. But I'm angry enough at this that I'm posting here anyway. And thanks for voting for me, Morm. If I had been privy to Nilp's, Lhuna's, and SPM's (and your) secret veteran code, I'd have played the game differently. There. That's the real issue. Not a level playing field. Lynch me. |
|
02-25-2006, 09:26 AM | #280 |
Energetic Essence
|
Well, now that I reread your previous post Lmp (I think it was post #268), I'm inclined to agree. However, this does not mean that you should quit, no matter how crooked this is. However, it was right out in the open for all of us to see so it's not really cheating. But now I'm not sure what to do...
However, if you want out, I'll help you. ++Littlemanpoet
__________________
I'm going to buy you a kitty, I'm going to let you fall in love with the kitty, and one cold, winter night, I'm going to steal into your house and punch you in the face! Fenris Wolf
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|