"Bid Aragorn remember the words of the seer, and the Paths of the Dead." Elrond |
Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
Marileangorifurnimaluim On Tolkien's famous essay... 03-19-2004, 07:21 PM
davem I can't argue with any of... 03-20-2004, 03:37 AM
Marileangorifurnimaluim Actually I haven't read it.... 03-20-2004, 04:19 AM
The Squatter of Amon Rûdh It's published in The... 03-20-2004, 06:21 PM
davem here:
... 03-20-2004, 08:42 AM
|
03-19-2004, 07:21 PM | #1 |
Eerie Forest Spectre
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Buried in scrolls of fanfiction
Posts: 798
|
On Tolkien's famous essay regarding Beowulf
Tolkien's essay on the then-artifact Beowulf has become, in itself, an artifact. One must squint to recall that there was once a day when Beowulf was so dismissed that it required such an ardent, erudite and thorough defense, replete with the requisite quotes in Latin, Old English and dusty references to the Aeneid - all those sorts of things that impress scholarly minds. Tolkien stood up to such a resounding chorus of objection that he was forced to reframe the entire plot of Beowulf in terms of a more acceptable story line, that of Oswald, and then rebuild the tattered remains of Beowulf, image by image, for the tight imaginations of his opponents, until it was clear that the poem could not have been written any other way. Odd indeed that a writer, a poet in particular, should be told posthumously "no, you should not have written that" or "no, you should not have written it that way." This sort of back-seat driver annoys me to this day, and for that reason alone I applaud his effort. Thank you, Professor Tolkien, I look forward to your essay on those who don't look up when the light turns green, or forget to use their turn signals. Would that these also become such an artifact as the vehement objections to Beowulf's value as an artistic work. Now, at least, it is considered a poem with an artistic integrity all its own; whether or not our more moldy scholars like it is beside the point.
I fear that my dissection of Tolkien's essay can be summarized as a Siskel & Ebert's "two thumbs up." But such is the power and the passion of the author that I am utterly convinced. Of course Beowulf's battle with the dragon must be counterbalanced with another dragon as his death. Anything less would have diminished him. Of course Beowulf had to fight a dragon rather than an ordinary foe. How else could he have been a hero, rather than simply another impressive leader in a line of many? Anything less and his fame would have been extinguished by the conquest of time. By killing the evil dragon, spawn of Cain, Beowulf rose above the mere rampaging primitives and became worthy - in the eyes of the poet - of his Christian ancestors. Beowulf the hero combined in a form of alchemy the heathen nobility and the Christian mystic, implying that despite their ancestor's ignorance, they had always struggled against the forces of darkness. They merely lacked the means. Tolkien does not say this, but Beowulf could not have conquered the dragon through any more sophisticated method than his bare hands, and the sharper weapons of a latter time could never have completely availed him. Because he was, in this poem, of an earlier, more primitive era. His assault had to be noble, but of necessity crude, to contrast with the poet's enlightened age. This, frustratingly, does not suffice to describe the force of Beowulf and the dragon, and does not begin to touch the sadness and implications of fate throughout. It is the nature of the poet to be understood intuitively, confoundingly compelling, despite the head-scratching of the surgeons who attempt an autopsy on the words. Bravo to Tolkien and any writer who assumes that mystery is essential, even more so the one who can preserve that mystery while describing it. A butterfly is more than the sum of its parts. Likewise the dragon. - Maril
__________________
Deserves death! I daresay he does... And some die that deserve life. Can you give it to them? |
|
|