Quote:
Originally Posted by Nogrod
What Roa did was something I have called "A Devil's Advocate" -view over someone. Looking at someone's posting with the evil eye, trying to see any suspicious things you could find and gathering them to a summary. She has done that before, and I have done those - not to speak of the master of the art Spawn... I guess we all have done those as both innocents and villains. So making of them does not make one suspicious, but the reactions to them do count.
|
I certainly agree with the last point. As for whether the making of the analyses renders Roa suspicious, I would welcome hearing from her why she chose Esty and I. I have not looked back, but my recollection is that she posted her analysis of Esty, then posted a list identifying Esty and I as “probable Wolves”, then went on to analyse me. I get the impression that she had decided (for whatever reason - possibly virtuous, possibly malign) that Esty and I were her suspects for toDay and then went on to analyse us with that in mind.
Someone (Ang?) mentioned before that her timing (Daybreak and Dusk) were fortuitius for a Wolf. And, if she is a Wolf, she has used that to her advantage. She seems to have had a large hand (paw?) in setting today’s agenda.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mithalwen
Wouldn't actually kill him for being a lawyer .... but it has to be born in mind that lawyers are trained to present cases.......
|
Oh, I’m no glory-seeking fancy-dan advocate. Simply a corporate background boy. However, I do rather pride myself on being able to present convincing positon papers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anguirel
I know. Am voting unhelpfully and feeling generally a bit inert and cavalier.
|
Hehe. I almost labelled you as “cavalier” rather than “profligate” before, but did not because I feared you might take it as a compliment.
Phantom, are we ever actually going to get some serious analysis from you, or are you still in dark-man-of-mystery mode?