The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum


Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page

Go Back   The Barrow-Downs Discussion Forum > Middle-Earth Discussions > The Books
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 01-05-2004, 06:14 AM   #1
metropolis_part_one
Pile O'Bones
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 25
metropolis_part_one has just left Hobbiton.
Sting Do you think the Fourth Age really was worse?

When the One Ring was destroyed the Three lost their power too, undoing a lot of the work the Elves had done in ME (like Lothlorien). Also the Elves finally left for good. It seems to me that the Fourth Age was supposed to contain less 'enchantment' and magic. I think this was partly meant to show the price that was payed for undoing Sauron - the world was forever changed. But do you think this makes the Fourth Age 'worse'? The magic of the Elves in the Third Age had grown stagnant and as it says in the Silmarillion, they attempted nothing new but clung on to old ways. They just tried to 'preserve' the world, unchanging, as in Lothlorien. It just seems to me that Middle Earth had 'outgrown' the Elves, and that they were no longer needed in it. So was it for the best that they left and their magic faded, or was this an occasion for lament as seems to be supposed?
__________________
For forty days and forty nights
They rode through red blood to the knee
And they saw neither sun nor moon
But heard the roaring of the sea
metropolis_part_one is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:46 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.