Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
View Poll Results: Is Eru God? | |||
Yes | 43 | 66.15% | |
No | 22 | 33.85% | |
Voters: 65. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-16-2005, 11:03 PM | #41 | ||
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Umbar, but before the corsairs took over. (Ave Maria University, FL, USA)
Posts: 632
|
Quote:
Quote:
In short, I agree with what lmp has already stated, so that's how I'll vote.
__________________
Gone for lentSeeyou at Easter! (And on Sundays too, maybe.)
|
||
11-17-2005, 02:32 AM | #42 | ||
Princess of Skwerlz
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: where the Sea is eastwards (WtR: 6060 miles)
Posts: 7,500
|
Quote:
Saucy, your precise and concise summary of the possibilities hits the nail on the head. I agree completely, though I suspect we aren't coming at the conclusions from the same point of view. Quote:
The mythology of Middle-earth is a lovely alternative, taking some variant points of view into consideration (such as making the Valar include elements of both pagan Gods and Judeo/Christian angels), but it cannot fit into Jewish and Christian theology. It is fiction and I enjoy it very much, but I do not attempt to reconcile it with my real life belief.
__________________
'Mercy!' cried Gandalf. 'If the giving of information is to be the cure of your inquisitiveness, I shall spend all the rest of my days in answering you. What more do you want to know?' 'The whole history of Middle-earth...' |
||
11-17-2005, 03:34 AM | #43 | |
Corpus Cacophonous
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A green and pleasant land
Posts: 8,390
|
Quote:
__________________
Do you mind? I'm busy doing the fishstick. It's a very delicate state of mind! |
|
11-17-2005, 09:00 AM | #44 |
Messenger of Hope
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In a tiny, insignificant little town in one of the many States.
Posts: 5,076
|
I don't really have to write anything any more. I was going to yesterday, trully I was, but right at that moment, Pop said it was time to go home. . .so we left and that means leaving the computer.
Anyway, if you want my view of the matter, you can go back and read Firefoot's post (except about Frodo. . .I've no qualms about that). In short - Eru is much like God, but there are differences which can not be over looked. But so many people have voiced what I think is right that I don't see much point in writing it again. -- Folwren
__________________
A young man who wishes to remain a sound atheist cannot be too careful of his reading. - C.S. Lewis |
11-17-2005, 09:01 AM | #45 |
Shady She-Penguin
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In a far land beyond the Sea
Posts: 8,093
|
It seems that the no-party are louder and better and longer-worded in their theories. I just wonder where are all the yes-people, since it's now 10-10 and most of the posts on this thread are by no-people.
I myself voted for "yes" without thinking so much about it, but now some of you (lmp, Lalwendë, Estelyn etc.) have made me think more about the issue. Advise: never vote in a BD poll without thinking the thing from as many aspects as you can . Anyway, I'd probably still say "yes", because I think the question as "Did Tolkien mean Eru to be God?" Of course we can debate endlessly only about the meaning of the question, but since Fordim refuses to explain the question, we must interpret it as we want to, or so says my logic...
__________________
Like the stars chase the sun, over the glowing hill I will conquer Blood is running deep, some things never sleep Double Fenris
|
11-17-2005, 09:55 AM | #46 | ||
Itinerant Songster
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Edge of Faerie
Posts: 7,066
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
11-17-2005, 10:15 AM | #47 |
Gibbering Gibbet
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beyond cloud nine
Posts: 1,844
|
Ah, and so as always we end up discussing the question the poll is asking rather than debating an answer to it. We could set up our own parliamentary democracy! (I call the Speaker's Chair!)
At any rate, Esty has already pointed to what I meant with the question: what do you think? If the question were what did Tolkien think the answer would be pretty obviously "yes" -- Tolkien intended Eru to be the Christian God (as Tolkien saw him). So we once again come to this: which should govern our interpretation -- authorial intent (Tolkien intended Eru to be God, so He is), or personal response (Eru doesn't seem like God to me, so he is not). And as always, I am caught somewhere in between.... Insofar as Tolkien clearly created Eru as an image of God, and inasmuch as M-E seems to run according to fairly strictly laid out Christian morality (as interpreted by Tolkien) then I would go for the yes side. But, insofar as Eru does not reflect my own view of what God is or may be, and inasmuch as I interpret the moral vision of Middle-Earth as reflecting some fairly pre-Christian notions of honour and doom (OE dom) then I would like to answer no. So to Roa and Saucy, who are both demanding I vote (quite justly) I will only say that I think I need to read some more responses and arguments before I can decide. Why do you think I start these polls? I genuinely want to see what people have to say to help me figure out where I stand... ...well, except for that whole Balrog-wings thing. They clearly have them and they clearly work, no need for discussion. Oh, and Elves' ears -- they're not pointy.
__________________
Scribbling scrabbling. |
11-17-2005, 10:32 AM | #48 | |
La Belle Dame sans Merci
|
Quote:
Seriously though, you pose a tough question. If you were to ask "Is that flower pink?" you could look at it and say "Why certainly, and a lovelier shade of whitish-red I've never seen." (note that this question does not work on blind men) But the question you ask, Professor Hedgethistle, is more along the lines of "Is that small Irish man clad all in green with a shillelagh in his hand and a wee pile of gold in his pocket a leprechaun?" In order to answer that, you must first contemplate "Well... are leprechauns real?" You know that the little Irishman is there, just as we have Eru to work with. The problem is trying to correlate what you've got to what you aren't entirely sure about. Do you see the dilemma? So if you were saying "Does Tolkien think that Eru's God?" I'd say "I think so, yeah." But since you're asking me, I have to put forth the point that well... perhaps both Eru and God are fictional creations/projections, so maybe they are the same. Then again, maybe I'm as blind as the man who can't see pink.
__________________
peace
Last edited by Feanor of the Peredhil; 11-17-2005 at 11:26 AM. Reason: grammar error |
|
11-17-2005, 10:36 AM | #49 | |
Shady She-Penguin
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In a far land beyond the Sea
Posts: 8,093
|
Quote:
__________________
Like the stars chase the sun, over the glowing hill I will conquer Blood is running deep, some things never sleep Double Fenris
|
|
11-17-2005, 12:09 PM | #50 | ||
Corpus Cacophonous
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A green and pleasant land
Posts: 8,390
|
OK, a vote ...
Quote:
But, since Fordim has already implicitly accused me of fence-sitting (unreasonably, in my view, as I was simply seeking to determine the nature of the question that I was being asked to answer ), I dare not risk further such lawyer-baiting taunts. The fact that Tolkien most likely intended Eru to represent his God, or rather an aspect of his God, is irrelevant as far as I am concerned since I have complete freedom to interpret the relevance and applicability of Eru to me. And, since aspects of Eru (like, I might add, some aspects of God in our world as presented by a number of faiths) are at odds with my conception of God (assuming that he exists), then I will have to answer the question, as originally posed and subsequently clarified, in the negative. Quote:
But I shall let it pass.
__________________
Do you mind? I'm busy doing the fishstick. It's a very delicate state of mind! |
||
11-17-2005, 12:22 PM | #51 | |
La Belle Dame sans Merci
|
Quote:
That's another comment I have: Fordim, you realize that all of our answers, besides having different concepts of "God" behind them, will be coming from people who side very strongly with certain critical theories, whether they know it or not? It's already been nudged at on this thread: the way people believe that literature should be interpreted is going to have a big effect on whether or not they think that ME's god is "our" God.
__________________
peace
|
|
11-17-2005, 12:31 PM | #52 | |
Corpus Cacophonous
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A green and pleasant land
Posts: 8,390
|
Quote:
Oops. Two cans of worms, having been duly opened by lmp and Fea, are liberally emptied all over the thread by Sauce ...
__________________
Do you mind? I'm busy doing the fishstick. It's a very delicate state of mind! |
|
11-17-2005, 12:33 PM | #53 |
Dread Horseman
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Behind you!
Posts: 2,743
|
Non-existent? Fea, you've clearly overlooked the infamous Canonicity thread -- all fifteen pages of it. Mwahahaha indeed.
|
11-17-2005, 12:38 PM | #54 | ||
La Belle Dame sans Merci
|
Quote:
EDIT: looks like I've got me some reading to do. Good thing I finished my homework already. EDIT #2: Quote:
__________________
peace
Last edited by Feanor of the Peredhil; 11-17-2005 at 12:42 PM. |
||
11-17-2005, 12:57 PM | #55 | |
Messenger of Hope
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In a tiny, insignificant little town in one of the many States.
Posts: 5,076
|
Quote:
Are people here sure that's what Tolkien meant Eru to be? Are you positive that it is a direct parralel, as well as he could make it? I'm not so certain. Anyone in the Christain faith knows that God's greatest thing was to send Jesus to earth and do the most difficult thing in the world for us measly human beings. But Tolkien wrote about Frodo Baggins, a tiny, poor, bewildered hobbit take the burden most of the way - and then even fail in the end. Eru let it happen like that. He didn't send his own son to do it, which he might've had it been a direct comparison. You want a god of an invented world who's meant to be God, read C.S. Lewis' Chronicles of Narnia. (The Sacrifice is both in The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe and in The Silver Chair. I'm sure many of us have invented worlds of our own and written about them, right? Well, recently, I've been running into problems. I need a god who can over look things so that everything doesn't run wild and go by chance and so that people actually have something to look up to when they're run down and completely broken by the cruel course of life. I don't want to write about a god who is actually God because that would be taking the assumption that I knew enough about God to actually write a fiction like that. Of course, if I should ever decide to put a god in, I'm going to fashion him after God, but I'll never try to claim or to write him as though he were God. I'm thinking that's more what Tolkien did. He's made very stark differences between God and Eru. . .I don't think he would have done that if he had wanted Eru to be God. Of course truths are going to show through Tolkien's work. It's impossible to avoid that. But he didn't like allegories, so he's not going to write one! -- Folwren
__________________
A young man who wishes to remain a sound atheist cannot be too careful of his reading. - C.S. Lewis |
|
11-17-2005, 01:04 PM | #56 | |
Corpus Cacophonous
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A green and pleasant land
Posts: 8,390
|
Quote:
... but that's for another thread. *One can of worms duly filled and sealed tight*
__________________
Do you mind? I'm busy doing the fishstick. It's a very delicate state of mind! |
|
11-17-2005, 01:16 PM | #57 | ||||
Dead Serious
|
Quote:
I guess it depends on how you think Eru REALLY works in Middle-Earth, and on how God really works in Real life. Quote:
Furthermore, as regards Frodo, yes he was given a very heavy burden. We are all given heavy burdens. Fail in the end? Of course Frodo failed. Catholicism teaches that we are all imperfect, flawed beings. However, you will note that his QUEST succeeded. The Ring was destroyed. Divine intervention? You decide. The results are the same. Finally, Frodo did receive his reward. And in this life even. Quote:
I'm don't intend any offence or sarcasm by this, but I am literally asking: how can we know WHAT Tolkien intended unless we go by what he wrote. And what he wrote says that the Lord of the Rings is a fundamentally Catholic work. It's God, therefore, must be a fundamentally Catholic God. Furthermore, as regards "stark differences" between Eru and God, I am inclined to disagree. I do not think that Eru is nearly as cold or distant as you think, although I will agree that He is not SHOWN as a major player in the books- much the way God is not shown as a major player in the history books, although that does not mean that He was not present. Any other differences between God and Eru can be put down to YOUR conception of God conflicting with TOLKIEN's conception of God. No one on this earth can truly KNOW God in His entirety, or even incompletely. Therefore, any presentation of God, be it in art, literature, or whatnot, can only be the presentation of what ONE PERSON knows of God. Quote:
And, if it is to be "real and true" history, it must contain the "real and true" God.
__________________
I prefer history, true or feigned.
|
||||
11-17-2005, 01:30 PM | #58 | |
La Belle Dame sans Merci
|
Quote:
__________________
peace
|
|
11-17-2005, 01:32 PM | #59 | |
Gibbering Gibbet
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beyond cloud nine
Posts: 1,844
|
Quote:
As to Eru-as-Tolkien's-God...if you want to see where he got Him just have a read through Beowulf. Squatter would be able to explain this much better (and in far more informed a fashion) than I, but the God we find in Beowulf is definitely the Christian God, but one who: a) never seeks a personal relationship with his creation(s), b) doesn't get directly involved with the battle between good and evil, c) stands by and allows the most horrific monsters to ravage the land, d) stands by as the people who destroy those monsters are themselves destroyed by the task, e) nobody prays to or worships in a church, but everybody sings about and praises with their bards, and f) is embraced by a culture and a people who believe whole-heartedly that the real meaning of life is found in the acts we do while alive, not where we go when we die, and that honour (how one is spoken of by others) is more important than conscience (how one thinks of oneself). That's why I have no problem seeing Eru as Tolkien's version of God. This might also explain why Tolkien had a particular love for Mary (as did many people in the "Dark Ages"), insofar as she provides a much more merciful and personal, even human, presence than God: the "world-cyning of Middeneard" (my spelling is all off there -- where is Squatter?)
__________________
Scribbling scrabbling. |
|
11-17-2005, 01:50 PM | #60 | |
Dead Serious
|
Quote:
However, if they know God at all, then surely they have to reconcile their knowledge of Him with the way He is presented in the Old Testament, right? Well, if you accept that the God of the Old Testament is the God of today, then how hard is it to accept the "God of Middle-Earth" as the God of today?
__________________
I prefer history, true or feigned.
|
|
11-17-2005, 01:53 PM | #61 | |||
Shade of Carn Dûm
|
***WARNING: An other oversized, not very informative post***
SpM:
Quote:
Quote:
It's so true! Just look at the title of this thread; Is Eru God? And do we have a good answer? No! Back to the Question As some of us interpret Fordim's question as what Tokien meant Eru to be, I believe that question can not be answered by us. As Formendacil said, who are we to know what Tolkien was doing? Therefor that question is quite meaningless to me. The question what do you think Tolkien meant or or do you think Eru is God is the only questions we can answer, and that's up to each and everybody. I doesn't matter how many differences or similarities we find between Illuvatar and the Christian God. We can't decide what Tolkien intended them to mean, if it meant anything. The fact that God inspired the creation of Eru is obvious, but where the limit of inspirated by and being God is drawn is quite diffuse. And we must remember that what Prof. T tried to create was not a historical document but a mythology. If we say that Eru is God, is Zeus God? Or Odin? I know there's a difference as Eru is a god from fiction, but he was still supposed to be a god of an alternative mythology. To go in on details in the behaviour or apperance of God and Eru is, according to me, wrong in discussing this question. There will always be similarities and differences. It's better to look at it from a wider perspective, not compare them act by act. And overall, there's a lot of thing alike for the two, but that's only natural. To say that they're the same because of that is impossible. And to say that Tolkien must have created Eru as the image of God just because of his own religious believes is a questionable reasoning. I bet there's a lot of christian writers out there who has created gods that do not resemble God. Folwren described his problems of creating a god that was not God in his post, but still he wants someone like him. God is our view of a good God of obvious reasons and when trying to create a good god, he ends up as something not to far away from our own. That, I believe, was the case in Tokien's god. Fordim: Quote:
__________________
Three switched witches watch three Swatch watch switches. Which switched witch watch which Swatch watch switch? He who breaks a thing to find out what it is has left the path of wisdom ~Lurker...
|
|||
11-17-2005, 02:24 PM | #62 | ||
Itinerant Songster
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Edge of Faerie
Posts: 7,066
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
11-17-2005, 02:29 PM | #63 |
Spectre of Capitalism
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Battling evil bureaucrats at Zeta Aquilae
Posts: 987
|
One Small Voice, One Man’s Opinion
As I have voted, I see now that it is incumbent upon me to defend that vote. And as most of you know I have never been able to shy away from a debate that has a hint of religion in it. :P
Although I find Estelyn’s points well made, I must politely disagree with her conclusion. I have always thought of the God of Middle-Earth as being a reasonable representation of the God Who Is. I base most of that thought on the words of Eru at the beginning of The Silmarillion, where He states (in my own paraphrase) that He is the ultimate Author of the Theme and the Music whence Ea sprang, and that none could alter that music in despite of Him – that those who attempt to do so will only find themselves the instruments of Eru in creating yet greater things which the errant creature had not intended. Additionally, I do not find the presence of Eru in Arda to be so far off as some describe. It is apparent that the hand of the Creator in Middle Earth, as in our real world, is ever-present and guiding events so that good eventually triumphs over evil, even though we may not see that Hand except in retrospect. I find it in the statement of Gandalf (himself an emissary) to Bilbo at the end of The Hobbit that his adventures were not solely for his benefit, that he is only a small hobbit in a very large world. I find it in the existence of predictive prophecy in some places (e.g. Malbeth the seer, Galadriel, others). I find it in the use of a good-hearted but weakened Frodo and a deranged and self-consumed Gollum in combination to be the destruction of the great evil of their day. It all sounds so, if you will, like God, like something He would arrange. Just as in our real world we do not see overt and obvious miracles taking place everywhere, so it is in Middle-Earth -- even the wizard Gandalf seems to rely mostly on his great wisdom and not on supernatural power. In both worlds the Power that rules over creation uses people, imperfect, unlikely people, to accomplish His ends. Though He is not oft mentioned in Middle Earth, perhaps it is because all consciously or unconsciously recognize His presence and His working – it is understood by all and therefore there is no need to make constant reference to it, like the air we breathe – it’s a given. Though there are those like Melkor/Morgoth or Lucifer/Satan who attempt to overthrow or thwart His purposes, it is in both worlds a vain effort. Though my post is not as scholarly as some, it is my opinion, and having held that opinion has increased my enjoyment of LOTR immensely. I may not change any minds – it is, after all, one small voice, and one man’s opinion
__________________
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. ~~ Marcus Aurelius |
11-17-2005, 02:35 PM | #64 | ||
Sword of Spirit
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oh, I'm around.
Posts: 1,401
|
Quote:
But, on the same note, I believe that Eru is like God. When I think about what Eru does, I am thinking of what God would do. So they are very similar in many respects, but the fact that they are different in even the minutest detail makes the answer no. I don't know if I explained that very well. Eru is God: Impossible. Eru is like God: Definite. Quote:
__________________
I'm on a Mission from God. |
||
11-17-2005, 02:41 PM | #65 | ||
Messenger of Hope
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In a tiny, insignificant little town in one of the many States.
Posts: 5,076
|
Formendacil, before I answer your smashing post in reply to my post, I have to ask you, and the other people who know the answer, a question.
You said, and I'll fetch is so we all know what I'm talking about: Quote:
As for your Quote:
Anyway, to get back on track - once I get an answer to this Mythology question, or whatever you want to call it, I'll have something more to say on the actual question of whether Eru is God or not. -- Folwren
__________________
A young man who wishes to remain a sound atheist cannot be too careful of his reading. - C.S. Lewis |
||
11-17-2005, 03:23 PM | #66 | |
Gibbering Gibbet
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beyond cloud nine
Posts: 1,844
|
Quote:
|
|
11-17-2005, 03:24 PM | #67 |
Doubting Dwimmerlaik
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Heaven's basement
Posts: 2,466
|
Love threads like this; a joy to read and by gosh even makes me think!
Tolkien may have patterned Eru after his knowledge and understanding of the Catholic God, yet to say that Eru is the God of Adam, Noah and Moses is a bit of a reach. Even when imagining that the Sil and LotR are history, I have a hard time reconciling Eru with the God of the Old Testament. As an example. the Ainur and Maiar aren't angels but more like relatives - cousins. Now think about it. Unless you misinterpret Genesis 6:1-4, angels do not have offspring with humans. Melian and Thingol's daughter marries Beren. And there are some Christians that believe in a preAdamic race of humans that were before the Fall. Are the peoples of ME these people? Or all they all post-Adam? I have a tough time reconciling either. Anyway, not to offend, but my point is that if you label Eru as Christian, then you have to buy the whole meal, not just sample from the buffet and call it dinner.
__________________
There is naught that you can do, other than to resist, with hope or without it.
|
11-17-2005, 03:26 PM | #68 | |
Illustrious Ulair
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In the home of lost causes, and forsaken beliefs, and unpopular names,and impossible loyalties
Posts: 4,240
|
I think its clear that Tolkien did not distinguish between Eru & God. The fact that he translated the prayers that were most significant to him into his own languages (Our Father, Ave Maria, Litany of Loreto, etc) points towards this, & many of the comments he makes in the notes to the Athrabeth confirm it.
Nevertheless, Eru is a character in the Legendarium, so its valid to question how close Eru is to God. Tolkien's own theology was perhaps slightly 'idiosyncratic' - or at least had a strongly 19th century feel to it, which many modern Christians may not agree with entirely. The problem with the way the poll is phrased is that it doesn't distnguish as to whether we are being asked what Tolkien intended or what out own opinion is. What Tolkien intended is not open to opinion - he intended what he intended & nothing else. What we feel is nothing but personal opinion & I don't see what we gain in terms of our knowledge of Tolkien's creation by stating our personal beliefs. EDIT As we know, the languages came first & the stories were created to provide a setting for them. Therefore the languages have primacy. If Tolkien translated various Christian prayers into Elvish are they part of the Legendarium? Was this an attempt by Tolkien to integrate his Christianity into his mythology? I don't think we can dismiss what he did as merely an accademic exercise (translating primary world texts into Elvish) because of the value & significance those particular prayers had for him: (I've bolded the ones he translated). Quote:
__________________
“Everything was an object. If you killed a dwarf you could use it as a weapon – it was no different to other large heavy objects." Last edited by davem; 11-17-2005 at 03:56 PM. |
|
11-17-2005, 04:03 PM | #69 | |
La Belle Dame sans Merci
|
Quote:
__________________
peace
|
|
11-17-2005, 04:12 PM | #70 | |
Wight
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: the Lepetomaine Gambling Casino For The Insane
Posts: 157
|
Firefoot brings up a question I came here to make a thread on.
Quote:
I, prefer to believe the former for the same reasons that I dislike the idea of fate, I like to believe that one really does his own work, and really averted failure and dislike the idea of being controlled, even by a perfect being (what fate is). throw some talk around
__________________
I support...something. |
|
11-17-2005, 04:13 PM | #71 | |
Illustrious Ulair
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In the home of lost causes, and forsaken beliefs, and unpopular names,and impossible loyalties
Posts: 4,240
|
Quote:
I haven't actually come down on one side or the other. I was simply saying that the comparison is a valid one, not that it is correct. |
|
11-17-2005, 04:18 PM | #72 | |
Messenger of Hope
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In a tiny, insignificant little town in one of the many States.
Posts: 5,076
|
Quote:
And won't somebody please answer my question? I'm unable to write anything until I know whether or not he did write it to be a myth. As it is, I won't be posting anything important again until tomorrow evening - at earliest! -- Folwren
__________________
A young man who wishes to remain a sound atheist cannot be too careful of his reading. - C.S. Lewis |
|
11-17-2005, 04:36 PM | #73 | ||
Shade of Carn Dûm
|
alatar:
Quote:
Quote:
And to you Folwren: I'm not the right person to answer your question, but I think he meant it to be a mythology of Great Britain. He was somewhat envious of the nordic people and others for their extensive mythology and collection of stories and myths. England has no own mythology. Sure, there's old tales and myths, but they're often not originally english. His "universe" were meant to be the mythology he missed in his own country. That's my opinion...
__________________
Three switched witches watch three Swatch watch switches. Which switched witch watch which Swatch watch switch? He who breaks a thing to find out what it is has left the path of wisdom ~Lurker...
|
||
11-17-2005, 05:10 PM | #74 | ||
La Belle Dame sans Merci
|
Quote:
For anybody who has read The Saga of the Volsungs, Tolkien borrowed extensively from it, including things like a magic ring that pretty much dooms anybody who comes in contact with it, the return of a king, the slaying of a dragon from a fissure below... Perhaps he also borrowed Odin who was the head honcho, theistically thinking, and who was not at all against occasionally stepping in to balance out fate a bit. Odin broke Sigmund's sword (which was, amazingly enough, reforged), Eru nudged Gollum into the volcano. Not the best comparison, but just a thought that I'd had. Eru would still be a god, he just wouldn't be "The" god. Quote:
__________________
peace
|
||
11-17-2005, 05:46 PM | #75 | ||
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Someday, I'll rule all of it.
Posts: 1,696
|
Fea's right- it's just a book.
As I said, I refuse to get involved in a religious debate over a work of fiction, but my veiws on the similarity between Eru and God were nicely stated by Thenamir. That being said, I find it irrelevant.
As Fordim clarified: Quote:
Quote:
__________________
We can't all be Roas when it comes to analysing... -Lommy I didn't say you're evil, Roa, I said you're exasperating. -Nerwen |
||
11-17-2005, 06:46 PM | #76 | ||
Cryptic Aura
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 5,997
|
Quote:
The other difficulty lies in deciding what weight to give works unpublished in Tolkien's lifetime. |
||
11-17-2005, 10:13 PM | #77 |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Someday, I'll rule all of it.
Posts: 1,696
|
I'm not really an authority on the unpublished works, so I think the question of their importance, again, goes to his intent. Were they unpublished because he didn't want them to be, or because he simply didn't have enough time? If it is the latter, then I think they should carry nearly the same weight of the published.
Also, if LotR was meant as a pre-history for our world, then it would stand to reason that Tolkien would keep at "meshable" with our reality as possible. There was never a stage of his life in which Tolkien wasn't Catholic, believing the Christian God to be part of our reality. Of course, I'm arguing the supposed intent of a dead man, so this is really just blowing smoke.
__________________
We can't all be Roas when it comes to analysing... -Lommy I didn't say you're evil, Roa, I said you're exasperating. -Nerwen |
11-17-2005, 10:14 PM | #78 | ||||
Corpus Cacophonous
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A green and pleasant land
Posts: 8,390
|
Quote:
Quote:
And what's with the Capitalisation of the "Few"? Dang! This tangent has the capacity to tie me up for weeks. I knew that I should have let it pass ... Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Do you mind? I'm busy doing the fishstick. It's a very delicate state of mind! |
||||
11-17-2005, 10:20 PM | #79 |
Ghost Prince of Cardolan
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Someday, I'll rule all of it.
Posts: 1,696
|
Certainly valid, Saucy, but hardly relevant to the question presented. I simple meant that in the context of the thread, it's meaningless. Such points are really just getting off topic. The question was "Is Eru God?" and the only person who would know for certain is Tolkien himself. Since he can't really answer that for us, we are left to discern what he thought on our own. Application of the text is a different subject altogether.
__________________
We can't all be Roas when it comes to analysing... -Lommy I didn't say you're evil, Roa, I said you're exasperating. -Nerwen |
11-17-2005, 11:04 PM | #80 | |
La Belle Dame sans Merci
|
Quote:
__________________
peace
|
|
|
|