Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
01-09-2002, 07:04 PM | #1 | ||
Wight
|
Questions
I have quite a few questions to ask.
There was a discussion earlier about the Istari and why they were sent to Middle Earth instead of having the Valar go and beat up Sauron. There were some good reasons. First off, if they had used their power to defeat Sauron, the lands around Mordor would end up being a pit of lava. Secondly, and this is the best reason, is that it brought the peoples of Middle Earth together. It turned out to be a very good decision on Manwes part and everything turned out to be for the best because the Ring was destroyed and so on. But I have a question. When Melkor openly declared himself to be against the other Valar, they realized that they had to do something about it. He was one of them and it was their problem. There was a good reason why they would have to do something about it too. And that is that they were the only ones who could have destroyed Melkor. The elves going to fight Melkor themselves was a bad thing because the Valar knew that he could not be defeated forever. Even if the elves had beaten Melkor, his spirit would have come back. Eventually, I think, the elves would have lost no matter what. So the Valar doing something about it was inevitable. Eventually, they go to Thangorodrim to rid Middle Earth of evil for once and all. But some of the evil survives - most importantly Sauron. They go back to Aman satisfied that they have done the right thing... even though some things ended up for the worst like The Silmarills. Then, after a while, they realize that Sauron is back. Here is the weird part. They all of the sudden decide it is not their problem. Why? At the council, it is asked if the Ring could be brought to the West (meaning bring it to the Valar), but Elrond and Gandalf both agree that this is Middle Earths problem and they should have to deal with it. I dont think they would have said that if the Valar didn't think the same thing. Now I understand that sending emissaries like the Istari was a very good thing and helped Middle Earth in more ways than one. But why should mortal peoples have to do all the hard work in destroying Sauron. Just because Sauron made a ring in Middle Earth doesn't mean it is supposed to be their problem to deal with. The Valar didn't do their job right by leaving Sauron their to take the place of Melkor. And then when they know help is needed they send some puny wizards to do what they will in the struggle against Sauron. That does not seem very logical. Sauron was invincible almost. Besides by getting extremely lucky (cant put enough enphasis on how lucky), the Istari could never have done anything but show people what to do before being killed by Saurons armies. Why did the Valar never help? Did they know that things would turn out the way they did? I understand fate has alot to do with what happens in Ea, but it doesn't always turn out for the best. And I have a question about Mandos. He knew what would happen, didn't he? He has insight into things that will "come to pass" as Galadriel would put it. So why didn't he tell Manwe that they should have attacked Melkor first before the Noldor did in the First Age when he escaped from Aman? In the end, more damage was done than need be. If they had just gone out in the first place and whooped Melkor, I dont think things with Feanor would have turned out the way they did. Then the men could have had a free Middle Earth to live on. The only problem with this is the Silmarills would have come back. I know this would create a big commotion in Aman about whether Feanor would give the Valar the Silmarills or not, but I think things would have turned out alright unless Feanor decided to stay in Middle Earth with his precious jewels. But I wont go into that because it is not a question. And to go even further into this, why didn't Mandos tell Manwe to keep Melkor locked up? If he knew alot about the future, he obviously knew that Melkor would still be evil. Then Feanor could have made the Silmarills in peace and they would be jewels that were good instead of being a source of evil. And why did the dominion of man have to come? I dont understand why the elves faded in Middle Earth when in the beginning they were meant to live on that very land. Did it have to do with the sun? I remember an elf saying "All things under the sun must pass". I think it was in LOTR when the fellowship was in Lorien. And just to get things straight about immortality on Aman. The elves say (in Numenor) that if Men tried to come to Aman they would not be immortal. Quote:
to Lewis on the matter. Quote:
Silmarill for a while. It said he aged much faster because of the jewel alone. I dont know how this all fits into Men and immortality, but I can guess. If Men went to Aman they COULD prolong their life, but it would be torturous to them. Eventually they would want to die. I just want to know am I right? And also, elves were immortal because that is the way they were born. So why does the elf say to the Numonereans "For it is not the land of Manwe that makes its people deathless, but the Deathless that dwell therein have hallowed the land." What does this mean? It seems to say that elves hallowing their land makes them deathless, but that is not right. I know I have to be reading something into it that is wrong, so I would like some explanation. For my final question, what is the Barrow Wights email? Thanks for all your future answering. More questions to come later. Sorry about the weird look of my post. I had to copy it into my email because I couldnt post for a while for some reason I dont know. [ January 09, 2002: Message edited by: Elendur ]
__________________
Son of Isildur. |
||
01-09-2002, 08:43 PM | #2 |
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 259
|
So many questions, so little time [img]smilies/smile.gif[/img]
I do not believe that Mandos was allowed to reveal all of the fait of Arda, I believe I read somewhere that Illuvitar prohibited him from telling Manwe and the other Vala everything. Manwe must have hoped that Melkor had really reformed and I guess Mandos must have thought/known that waiting to beat up Melkor was for the best. As for the question as to why the Valar didn't just go and capture Sauron imidiatly, it says in the Silmarillion that seeing the fall of his master Sauron humbled himself before Eonwe and asked for forgiveness. But since Sauron was of the same order as Eonwe, Eonwe said Sauron had to go to Aman to be pardoned. Sauron chickens out and goes and hides. I don't think that the Valar were able to find Sauron and with Belriand sinking and all the destruction going on I guess they just thought it was best to leave him. By the time Sauron declared himself openly again, the Valar would have had to do more damage to ME to get him again. Plus as you pointed out they probably knew it was going to turn out better if the ring was kept in ME. Even without the ring Sauron probably would have overcome ME, so it makes sense that the Valar wouldn't want to take it. As for the why the elves had to fade, I think it is just a quality of ME itself. It says everything fades quicker in the appendix of The Return of the King (Ex: The span of men’s lifetime’s gets shorter and shorter). As for Aman, I think it is similar to Lorien in that time doesn't have the same affect as it does in ME. It actually says that Beren dies quicker because he is exposed to the light of the silmarill. I guess men can’t handle the differences in the passage of time. I do not know what Barrow Wight’s e-mail is. Hope this answers some of your questions, and I'm sure someone will point out if any of my info isn't completely correct. [ January 09, 2002: Message edited by: Thingol ]
__________________
Yet the lies that Melkor, the mighty and accursed, Morgoth Bauglir, the Power of Terror and of Hate, sowed in the hearts of Elves and Men are a seed that does not die and cannot be destroyed; and ever and anon it sprouts anew, and will bear dark fruit even unto the latest days. |
|
|