Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
10-10-2008, 01:32 PM | #1 |
Doubting Dwimmerlaik
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Heaven's basement
Posts: 2,466
|
Otho and Lobelia Apply for a Mortgage
Been rereading The Fellowship of the Ring as part of the hundredth reread. What struck me as odd this time through, though maybe it's just me, is that when Otho and Lobelia try to burgle Bag End from the 'there and back again' Bilbo, Otho is only 31 and Lobelia is 23 years in age. Didn't Hobbits come of age at the magical number of 33? Was Otho premature?
Also, oddly enough, though Otho was 8 years older than Lobelia, they both expended exactly 102 years on this Middle Earth. Quite a coincidence, or just convenient?
__________________
There is naught that you can do, other than to resist, with hope or without it.
|
10-10-2008, 09:41 PM | #2 |
Gruesome Spectre
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Heaven's doorstep
Posts: 8,037
|
I would guess that the Hobbit's Coming of Age at 33 wasn't yet conceived by J.R.R.T at the time of The Hobbit.
He didn't know he would one day be writing a sequel, and I'm sure that when he did get around to writing FOTR he probably never considered the ages of Otho and Lobelia to be overly significant, minor characters that they were.
__________________
Music alone proves the existence of God. |
10-11-2008, 08:19 AM | #3 |
Cryptic Aura
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 5,996
|
They probably applied for one of those subprime mortgage specials. Not only did they not need a large down payment, they didn't have to be at the age of majority and that led to all kinds of delinquency.
__________________
I’ll sing his roots off. I’ll sing a wind up and blow leaf and branch away. |
10-12-2008, 05:46 AM | #4 |
A Mere Boggart
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: under the bed
Posts: 4,737
|
Maybe a Hobbit 'coming of age' just meant something different in The Shire than it does to us. It's not as if they have longer childhoods or much longer lives anyway. The traditional British 'coming of age' point, at 21, is pretty meaningless anyhow as most things you need to be an adult to indulge in become legal at the age of 16, 17 and 18. I can't think of anything which is or ever has been legalised at the age of 21?
__________________
Gordon's alive!
|
10-12-2008, 07:59 AM | #5 | |
Gruesome Spectre
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Heaven's doorstep
Posts: 8,037
|
Quote:
It would appear that "33" for Hobbits was similar: a status change and a sign that the standards of conduct demanded by society were now different.
__________________
Music alone proves the existence of God. |
|
10-12-2008, 08:21 AM | #6 |
Curmudgeonly Wordwraith
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ensconced in curmudgeonly pursuits
Posts: 2,509
|
I would say this is another example of Tolkien having to forcibly marry two dissparate stories into the semblance of a single seamless narration. One doesn't get the impression that the Sackville-Bagginses are giddy teen newlyweds in The Hobbit.
__________________
And your little sister's immaculate virginity wings away on the bony shoulders of a young horse named George who stole surreptitiously into her geography revision. |
10-14-2008, 10:28 AM | #7 | |
Pilgrim Soul
Join Date: May 2004
Location: watching the wonga-wonga birds circle...
Posts: 9,458
|
Quote:
However I imagine it would have been the legal majority and voting age that surely Tolkien was thinking of. Personally 21 wasn't meaningless for me since my family were traditionalists and I got some serious jewellery
__________________
“But Finrod walks with Finarfin his father beneath the trees in Eldamar.”
Christopher Tolkien, Requiescat in pace |
|
10-14-2008, 10:41 AM | #8 |
Doubting Dwimmerlaik
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Heaven's basement
Posts: 2,466
|
That all said, then why is Frodo's 33d birthday such a big todo?
__________________
There is naught that you can do, other than to resist, with hope or without it.
|
|
|