The One Ring: A Thing of Beauty?

[Sardy]

Not so much as question as a topic for discussion. It occurs to me that whereas the three Elven rings are things of neary unsurpassed beauty (and I am less certain of the physical appearance of the seven and the nine), The One Ring is a simple gold band. Even under the duress of fire when the black verses are displayed, it remains a thing of utilitarian "plainness."

What does this say of it's maker's asthetic tastes? While I can see a certain industrial bent to Sauron (I would attribute this mindset more to Saruman, however) it also seems to me that he is one to enjoy striking fear into the very hearts of his enemies with both his appearance and his pyrotechnics: the Great Eye, for just one example...

Surely in crafting his accomplishment to beat all accomplishments, a little more flair might've been in order?

Any thoughts?

[The Might]

Why?
The Ring served his purpose, it allowed him to control the bearers of all the other Rings. Why put some fancy stone on it?
Personally, I think it would have made more sense to have it made out of mithril rather then gold, but as we see the material doesn't really count either, since it can't be destroyed by anything but the fires of Mount Doom.
Not sure why the other Rings had gems actually, maybe just to look nicer.

[Estelyn Telcontar]

In "The Shadow of the Past" (FotR), we read what Gandalf reports about Déagol's finding of the Ring:

...there in his hand lay a beautiful golden ring; and it shone and glittered in the sun so that his heart was glad.
Sméagol... strangled him, because the gold looked so bright and beautiful.

Then, in the same chapter, we read of Frodo's impression of the ring's appearance:

The gold looked very fair and pure, and Frodo thought how rich and beautiful was its colour, how perfect was its roundness. It was an admirable thing and altogether precious.

Modern design has shown that beauty can be in the shape of an object, even without any adornment. Additionally, in this case the metal itself appeared beautiful to the beholder. I wonder if that was a trick of the Ring? Did it enchant its viewers to think it beautiful, or was it so perfectly formed that it was indeed beautiful? If so, that is interesting: in Tolkien's writings, evil does not normally appear to be beautiful - unless it deceives.

[Morwen]

"The Nine, the Seven, and the Three," he said, "had each their proper gem. Not so the One. It was round and unadorned, as it were one of the lesser rings; but its maker set marks upon it that the skilled, maybe, could still see and read." (my emphasis)

Gandalf recalling the words of Saruman, FotR, The Council of Elrond

It would seem that the One is purposefully plain so that a casual observer would not identify it as one of the great rings.

Originally posted by Sardy

Surely in crafting his accomplishment to beat all accomplishments, a little more flair might've been in order?

Well it is the One Ring to rule them all. The accomplishment IMO is that it exists. Let the Elves adorn their rings with whatever gems they liked. The One was still more powerful.
Besides I don't know that lack of a gem stone would make the One less beautiful. It is I suppose a matter of taste. There is a beauty in its simplicity after all, a perfect circle, "it looked to be made of pure and solid gold".

[The Sixth Wizard]

I think the lack of a gem adds to its pulling power. If it displayed its power openly, one might think to fight it, but as it is unadorned, it feels as though it is part of the holder, always at the back of his mind, the holder is unable to break free of its perfection and unrelenting conformity.

Ooh, big words there Sixthy.

[Bêthberry]

It harkens after the difference between an engagement ring (jewelled) and a wedding ring (plain). It's the second that is binding.

[Boromir88]

Very good topic Sardy. I think Esty is on to something and poses some good questions:

I wonder if that was a trick of the Ring? Did it enchant its viewers to think it beautiful, or was it so perfectly formed that it was indeed beautiful?

I think we can say it's a bit of both. As a band of gold it would hold some beauty and attraction to it. However, the One Ring is nothing specially 'beautiful' it is a simple band of gold, therefor it is mostly the deceit of the Ring.

in Tolkien's writings, evil does not normally appear to be beautiful - unless it deceives.

Good point, as Galadriel says:

'And you?' she said turning to Sam. 'For this is what your folk would call magic, I believe, though I do not understand clearly what they mean; and they seem to use the same word of the deceits of the Enemy.'~The Mirror of Galadriel

The Ring itself is one of these 'deceits of the Enemy':

'It was part of the essential deceit of the Ring to fill minds with imaginations of supreme power.'~Letter 246

The Ring was already deceitful in the way that it made people believe with the Ring you can have 'supreme power' and get what you want. For example, if Boromir took the Ring he could march a great host to overthrow Sauron and beat him. And Sam could turn the horrid Gorgoroth into a giant and beautiful garden, all he had to do was claim the Ring. That is one of the 'deceits' of the Ring.

If we read how the Ring appears and looks, we see I think as Sardy wonders; what is so unnaturally beautiful about it? And as TM quotes the One Ring looks as if it's one of the lesser rings. What Tolkien does do is use a rich language (to the masterful skill that he is able to do) to make the Ring look like something it really isn't...as splendid and 'awing' object to look at. You could even say he is not only trying to deceive the characters in his story, but he's also trying to deceive his readers!

Taking the descriptions Esty has provided, the Ring is described as if it is one of the 7 wonders of the world:

...there in his hand lay a beautiful golden ring (1); and it shone and glittered in the sun (2) so that his heart was glad.
Sméagol... strangled him, because the gold looked so bright and beautiful (3).

1. The One Ring was indeed beautiful. As it is a piece of gold, it should have some sort of attraction and beauty to it. However, does this mean that this 'band of gold' is the greatest thing since sliced bread? I don't believe so, I think it is an ordinary and simple looking ring, but the Ring tricks and deceives it's victims.

2. The ring 'glittered in the sun.' So it was a shiny ring, nothing really spectacular about that. Gold does glitter in the sunlight. It probably makes it look pretty, but there is nothing unusually beautiful about the Ring shining in the sunlight.

3. This part is from Smeagol's perspective. Smeagol strangled Deagol because the Ring 'looked so bright and beautiful.' Now, I think that this is Smeagol under the power of the Ring. He is already lost to the Ring and under it's hold; hence why he kills for it.

The gold looked very fair and pure, and Frodo thought how rich and beautiful was its colour, how perfect was its roundness. It was an admirable thing and altogether precious.

Again here we have the 'gold looked very fair and pure.' (In Frodo's eyes) So, it looked like it was pure gold and it was pretty...still nothing spectacular stands out about the Ring's 'beauty.' The rest is from Frodo's perspective, and this is right before he contemplates throwing the Ring into his fire and possibly injuring the Ring. Frodo can't bring himself to do it because when he looks at the Ring, it is so perfect, admirable and precious. In Tolkien's Letter to Milton Waldman (I'll be paraphrasing here)...Tolkien says that 'so great was the Ring's power of lust it was beyond the strength of any will (even Sauron's); to neglect it, injure it, or cast it away.'

The Ring appearing 'perfect' and 'precious' to Frodo was right before he was thinking about tossing it into his fire...hmm can we say that this is the power of the Ring and not the actual appearance of the Ring? I think so. As it is only then when the Ring looks 'perfect' to Frodo, so 'perfect' that he can't bring himself to throwing it in his fire.

So, from the descriptions of the Ring we are given, I come to believe that it is an ordinary band of gold. It's simple, it's plain (as the script on it has disappeared), it's ordinary, there is nothing special about it's beauty. It glitters in the sun...so does all gold and shiny objects. It's shape is 'perfectly round,' I would hope a ring is round and not a square or something (it is from Frodo's eyes that the Ring is 'perfectly round' - remember that). So, when we get down to it, as a band of gold, it would hold value and therefor have some attraction to it. But to say if this 'band of gold' is specially beautiful...so pretty in fact that someone killed over it, Bilbo had trouble letting it go, and Frodo couldn't bring himself to throwing it in his fire. I would have to say it's not, it's a plain band of gold. It is the very power and deceit of the Ring (as Esty touches upon) that makes the Ring look more than what it actually is. I also think Tolkien uses language to the great skill that he does, to not only deceive Frodo and Smeagol into believing the Ring is this precious and perfect object, but also deceive his readers. He uses rich language to make the readers also think this One Ring is an object with a great and special beauty to it. But, when you get down to it, and read the descriptions there's nothing special about the Ring at all...it's a plain band of gold. It deceives and appears to be something more beautiful than what it actually is.