Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
04-06-2005, 02:41 PM | #1 | ||
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
|
Narn i Chîn Húrin 3: The End of the Narn
This is the first draft of an expaned version ot the Story of Túrin Turambar NA. Our basis text is: Unfinished Tales; part 1; The First Age ; chapter 2: The Narn i Hîn Húrin (Narn). All additions from other sources are marked.
For a easier discussion the text will be devided into three parts: 1. The Fostering of Túrin: Reaching from the intro to the Narn until the end of Dor-Curathol 2. Beleg & Falivirn: Takes the story until the Fall of Nargothrond 3. The End of the Narn Part 1 corrospondes more or less to the part of the Narn given in Unfinished Tales up to the big break at the end of Of Mîm including what is given in the Appendix to the Narn Part 2 does fill the break in the Narn as given in Unfinished Tales. In this part only we will try to take up parts of the old Lay of the Children of Húrin. Part 3 is the End of the Narn as given in Unfinished Tales. And there is not much to add or to change in this part. In addtion one thread will hold the general changes. We have 4 groups of changes: NA-zz: General changes given and discussed in the list below. These changes are taken up in the text, but they are not indicated by "editorial markers" NA-RG-zz: These changes are semi general. They are normaly forced by a change in the nomuclature but could within the lines of a poem that are added not dealt with by simple replacment. The changed nomuclature is listed but not numbered with the general changes below. NA-SL-zz: Changes done to make the storyline fit to the later sources. These editorial markers are also sometimes used when a change was not made that could or should be considered and discussed in view of the stroyline of a later text. NA-TI-zz For text that is takenin from other sources since it was left out in the version given in the Unfinisched Tales. NA-EX-zz For expansions taken from some other source to make the story more detailed. This also includes some changes made in the expansion, and texts takenin which I marked for easier reference. Some conventions of my writing: Normal Text is from the basic text that is mentioned above (when I change the basic-Text it will be mentioned) Bold Text = source information, comments and remarks {example} = text that should be deleted [example] = normalised text, normaly only used for general changes <source example> = additions with source information example = text inserted for grammatical or metrical reason /example/ = outline expansion Normally if an inserted text includes the beginning of a new § these is indicated by a missing “>” at the end of the § and a missing “<” at the beginning of the next. There are not much changes in this last section. Therefore the amount of text given here is equally small. Quote:
NA-EX-59: It might be better to skip the sentence right before that insertion but I am not sure if that is really needed. NA-EX-60: This is the only place were I did insert the wearing of the Dragon-helm into the later story. This might be to conservative but I sought it would work together with NA-EX-61. NA-EX-61: The additions made here are risky since we have no clue how Tolkien would have dealt with the scene. But I followed the note in the Appendix of the Narn as good as I could. NA-EX-62: We have already discussed the need of this change in WH were Aiwendil did remark that the word Talbor would not be understand if it is nowhere defined. Here now is the place to define it, but I found my self cheated by my memory. I thought that in WH we had an actual statement how this would have been done here but all I could find was this: Quote:
In addition to the numbered points there is a further case that must be considered: “Then they lifted up Túrin, and saw that his sword was broken asunder. So passed all that he possessed.” This sentence isn’t quite correct if the Dragon-helm is considered. The Helm could be considered as not in Túrins possession but only a item loan by his elder to be given to his heirs. But that is very artificial. If we name the Helm here (“Then they lifted up Túrin, and saw that his sword was broken asunder. So passed all that he possessed NA-EX-61.5<editorial addition save the Dragon-helm of Dor-lómin>.”) it would be very strange not to mention its further placement. We know that Tolkien planed for a time to return the Helm to Húrin while he came in contact to Brethil. But in Wh we decided that this is an unworkable plan or was skipped by JRR Tolkien while writing the text of WH. Thus on the one hand we cannot say that it was buried with Túrin and we can not say it was left in Brethil since we saw no way to in cooperate that into WH. I do not know any good way out of this dilemma that would not be a fan-fic. (I can envision a nice story-line were the helm was taken to Menegroth by Mablung in the hope that Morwen might be found and were Húrin received it there from Thingol or from Mablung himself. But that is pure fan-fic.) The more I think about this the more tend to try again to in cooperate the Helm into WH. Respectfully Findegil |
||
01-18-2006, 06:30 PM | #2 | ||||
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
|
NA-EX-61: I don't doubt that Tolkien would have re-written this dialogue quite differently; but we are constrained to make the minimal change. I think that perhaps we could just leave it at:
Quote:
Quote:
NA-EX-62: I think it's fine to put the name here. After all, we must artificially insert it either here or in WH, and I don't see any reason to prefer one over the other. So it seems to me that putting it in at the first reference to the stone is more natural. Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
01-19-2006, 05:52 PM | #3 | |||||
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
|
Quote:
NA-EX-62: That point is done then. Are you fine with NA-EX-59 and NA-EX-60? NA-EX-61.5: Yes your solution is simple and effectiv. But still I tend to bring the story of the Dragon-helm to the point were Tolkien left it. And that would mean to mention that Húrin recieved it back in the end. The draft outline reads for me like the startingpoint for WH. Okay the story developed much while it was actually written. But is not "They will not admit him - saying that the Halethrim do not wish any more to become enmeshed in the shadow of his kin" what Manthor doth before his death. I see some possible points to mention Húrin recieving the Helm: Version 1: Just here were Túrin died: Quote:
Quote:
Version 3: During the Moot: Quote:
Quote:
Respectfully Findegil |
|||||
01-27-2006, 03:04 PM | #4 | |
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
|
Quote:
I have given the matter of the Dragon-helm some more thought. It still seems to me that the note in which the Helm is given to Hurin was superceded by WH. The crucial point, it seems to me, is that in the original note the new lord of Brethil gave the Helm to Hurin. I don't think there can be any doubt that at this stage, that lord was imagined to be sympathetic to Hurin and that the Helm was given in friendship; if some other story lay behind the gesture, I'm sure this would have been mentioned. The introduction of Hardang makes the note obselete, in my opinion. I certainly acknowledge that it's possible that Tolkien would have re-introduced the Helm had he continued WH. But this is just one of many cases where there is something Tolkien might have done. Moreover, it seems to me very likely that, had he still envisioned the Helm coming to Hurin, he would have mentioned it in one of the outlines for the continuation of WH. So it looks like I'm still against giving the Helm to Hurin. |
|
01-27-2006, 05:43 PM | #5 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
|
NA-EX-61.5: I can understand your point. And I must admiss that non of my own tries was fully statisfaying for myself. So we will take your suggestion and skip simply the sentence "So passed all that he possessed."
It seems we are done with this chapter for the moment. It is a pity that in the moment are only two of us are active. I fell that in this way we can not produce anything final. Nevertheless I will produce a new version of the text as soon as I get a bit of time for it. Happily the project had been going so slow that I was able to keep up with the changes discussed here. I only must make a final check if I have done all the changes. Are we going on in the same way with Beren & Luthien? Respectfully Findegil |
01-28-2006, 09:30 PM | #6 | |
Late Istar
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,224
|
Quote:
I suppose Beren and Luthien is next. I will take a look at that thread as soon as I get a chance. |
|
09-11-2015, 11:44 AM | #7 | |
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Tol Morwen
Posts: 358
|
In my version, the Helm of Hador is buried along with Gurthang - I don't see any other way of incorporating the fate of the Dragon-helm inside the story (actually I do, but all the other versions seem rather unsatisfactory to me).
__________________
Quote:
Last edited by Arvegil145; 09-11-2015 at 12:16 PM. |
|
09-12-2015, 05:31 PM | #8 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
|
But for burying the Dragon-Helm with Túrin no evidence whatsoever is found in Tolkiens writing.
Respectfuly Findegil |
09-13-2015, 11:24 AM | #9 | ||
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Tol Morwen
Posts: 358
|
Quote:
Also, since Túrin wore the Helm when he killed Glaurung, I don't think it unlikely that the Helm was buried along with Túrin - and moreover, it would be a fitting end of the House of Hador - its greatest heirloom buried for ever alongside the heir of Dor-lómin. Of course, as you said, there is no textual evidence for that, but I simply had to find a fitting way of resolving the fate of the Helm of Hador - besides, every other attempt at resolving its loose end would be a concoction too - my no better than the rest.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
09-14-2015, 03:36 AM | #10 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,721
|
Your analyses of the textual situation is perfect, but you conclusion is wrong.
To be clear: Your interpretation of the facts is as good as that of anyone else. But what we put into our text is not what we think that most like happend. If we finde out that an issue is unsetteled by JRR Tolkien, we will not write any hint of what we think happend in our text. Instaed we have to write our text in a way that every possible solution will stay possible. Ambivalent wirting is what we Need, not inovative writing. Respectfuly Findegil |
09-14-2015, 05:29 AM | #11 | |
Shade of Carn Dûm
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Tol Morwen
Posts: 358
|
You are right. But I simply could not resist (at least in my version) to let such an important thing unresolved. But, as I said, you are right - and it should be excluded from your version, of course.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|