Visit The *EVEN NEWER* Barrow-Downs Photo Page |
|
08-23-2017, 04:51 PM | #1 | |||
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,720
|
Chapter 1: Of the Beginning of Time
This is the first draft of the chapter 1 Of the Beginning of Time. The shift of the material from the Ainulindalë into this chapter and the split of this first chapter was discussed in the thread about the Ainulindalë. The shift is as well the reason why some of the changes have already been discussed and why there is kind of a mess with the editing marker in this chapter.
Our text basis would be that of Ainulidalë D given in HoME 10. But it is not much left of it. The text is rather amalgamated from Myths Transfromed, Ainulidalë D, Later Quenta Silmarillion and Annals of Aman. Therefore all snippets that are used have a source info at their beginning. We have four three groups of changes: General changes given in the text below and discussed in the thread ‘General changes in TftE’. These changes are taken up here and marked in the text as changes (e.g. {Úrin}[Húrin]), but they are not indicated by "editorial markers". For the general changes please look into the Thread ‘General changes in TftE’. AINU-zz these were numbered by Antione, when the passages were still part of the Ainulindalë. I will stick to these editing marker for consistence reference. I have renumbered all the other changes with BoT-zz Some conventions of our writing: Normal Text is from the basic text that is mentioned above. Bold Text = source information, comments and remarks {to be deleted} = text that should be deleted, for a better readability I have in this file crossed the text out. The forum does not support crossed out text. [ ] = normalised text <source > = additions with source information example = text inserted for grammatical reason / / = outline expansion Normally if an inserted text includes the beginning of a new § these is indicated by a missing “>” at the end of the § and a missing “<” at the beginning of the next. But the source information is not repeated before each §. But sometimes the new § was taken as a new add and handled accordingly. Quote:
BoT-01: If my memory is correct this title was agreed upon in the chapter structure thread were we discussed the split. The alternative was ‘Of the Beginning of Days’ from Sil77. BoT-02: We begin here with a long part from Myths Transformed. It serves nicely as introduction and is the latest source for all this time. As long as it fits to the flat Earth cosmology that we are working in it should be useable. BoT-03: In this editing it can be seen that Ainulindalë was our basis text. Since what we skip at the beginning was replaced with the more elaborated and later account from MT. BoT-04: The §§ 25-27 of the Ainulindalë are used in the corresponding chapter of TftE. The global decision to skip Ælfwine leads to the farther changes in the beginning of this passage. BoT-05, BoT-06 and BoT-07: Here AAm does provide some more fitting and phrases and some more details. BoT-08: MT has here the most specific detail that Melkor was driven into the void outside Arda. BoT-09: I think it important to tell that Melkor all the time desired Arda. BoT-10: We are back to our basis text now. BoT-11: An addition from an more arcane source. But nonetheless worth considering. BoT-12: The seven great Ones of Arda are replaced in the Valaquenta the nine Aratar the high Ones of Arda. Therefore the passage here is skipt. AINU-09 and AINU-10: The famous ‘Yavanna’ as a tree passage. For the long winding discussion leading to this editing look into the Ainulidalë thread. BoT-13: Here we skip the end of the Ainulindalë with its short description of the first Battle and the frame story element of Ælfwine bring Pengolodh to speak farther and jump the beginning of Pengolodh detailed description of the first War. BoT-14: LQ has a bit more of details here. BoT-15: The feast on Almaren is best descript in [/b]AAm[/b]. BoT-16: I added here the information what it meant that the Spring of Arda was marred. BoT-17: The search for Melkor, when the signs of evil are seen is a new element introduced in MT. But for me at least it makes a lot of sense. BoT-18: This Element is more difficult. It comes clearly from a round earth version. It would nonetheless be nice if we could hold it. At least it is clear in all later writings that stopping time form causing changes (as with the Rings of Power) was considered a sin (a deed against the design of Eru). The building of the Lamps might already have come near to such a deed. BoT-19, BoT-20 and BoT-21: For this § Three sources are mixed. Choosing from each the most detailed part. AINU-11: Back to the basis text. But we have to remove the frame story elements here. BoT-22: This is based on the maps, where after the fall of the lamps the three different continents Aman, Middle-earth and the Land of the Sun are build out of the full symmetric single land mass around the See of Almaren. BoT-23, BoT-24: This sounds a bit redundant, but I what is given as action after the darkness and confusion seems worth the mix. BoT-25: The text here was based on an older version of the story where Melkor attacked at once and build Utumno after the battle. There fore editorial change. BoT-26: The Info about Angband is missing from the other used sources. And with that we also give the information that from this time on Sauron was no longer a spy for Melkor among the Valar, but openly sides with Melkor. I think that many of these changes were already discussed in the Ainulindalë thread, before we decided to move the first War to the beginning of the Quenta Silmarillion. The chapter as it stands know as well interferes with the rest of the original first chapter Of Valinor and the two Trees. Therefore I will not waited for the discussion of this chapter to be finished but posted that chapter as soon as I find the time to prepair the draft. Respectfully Findegil |
|||
08-23-2017, 10:36 PM | #2 | |||
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
|
Thoughts
Having read through the changes, I have only a few comments:
In the second paragraph, the [sic] is in reference to the grammatically incorrect "being." it should be "beings" plural. In the next paragraph: Quote:
BoT-15: This addition is fine, but: Quote:
BoT-18: This is indeed a problematic section for several reasons. It references a change in light which has not yet happened (as everything is still lit in unchanging day, and the only ill that has happened is the corruption of Melkor) and thus feels out of place. If it were to be included it should be moved to after the fall of the lamps. Even so, I think it too closely tied to the round earth version to be included, as it references day and night, and the sun and moon, long before such things existed. Therefore, I think it is best and safest simply to remove it. BoT-20: This addition is fine but: Quote:
AINU-11: This entire segment until BoT-23 does not fit here. It pretty clearly refers to the original war of the Valar in Arda, as Melkor is said just after this to flee in the darkness and confusion after the fall of the lamps. Thus this whole section should be moved earlier. I would have it replace BoT-05,as it fits in quite nicely. Those were the only things I noticed, the rest was quite wonderful! |
|||
08-24-2017, 07:05 PM | #3 | |||
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,720
|
Arcus Calion worte:
Quote:
Children of God -> Children of ?: I agree that God should be changed. But I think that Children of Ilúvatar is the most natural replacement, or was it your desire to keep a difference by taking Eru? BoT-15: What about: '..., and Vána robed her in her {flowers}[signs of spring], ...'? BoT-18: As said in my comment, I am also hesitating with this addition. Probably we can work it into the chapter of the making of the sun and the Moon. What about using such a reduced version here: Quote:
AINU-11: I am not that sure, which conflict is here discribed. But nonetheless I agree to chift the §. But I would not repalce BoT-05 but arange the texts differntly: Quote:
Findegil |
|||
08-24-2017, 08:12 PM | #4 |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
|
I agree with all of those changes, they all look good.
|
09-23-2017, 04:34 PM | #5 | ||
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,720
|
I found an addition worth considering while working on The Making of the Sun and the Moon ... chapter:
Quote:
In addition I found a better place to use a later part of BoT-17. So we must skip it here: Quote:
Respectfully Findegil Last edited by Findegil; 09-23-2017 at 04:39 PM. |
||
09-24-2017, 09:13 PM | #6 |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
|
agreed.
|
09-25-2017, 06:35 PM | #7 | ||||
Wight
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 121
|
I'm new to this forum so I apologize if I am misinterpreting how to read the draft. Here are some suggestions:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
09-25-2017, 07:51 PM | #8 | |
Quentingolmo
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 525
|
Welcome gandalf! It's nice to have another person around besides me and Findegil! I think I've been driving him a little crazy haha
To answer your points in order: 1. The "their coming" refers to the Elves. So the days before the coming of the Elves. It is not redundant therefore. 2. However weird it feels for Tulkas to use fire to defeat Melkor, it is what Tolkien wrote in his latest version of the story (Myths Transformed). Who are we to question him? 3. Iluvatar gifted the light to Varda which she used to make the stars. She is always the star-maker, not merely a transporter. 4. The names were removed here because later on in the draft they are formally named in the body of the text: Quote:
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo. |
|
09-26-2017, 12:51 PM | #9 |
Wight
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 121
|
Haha, I can definitely imagine you two driving each other crazy. I'm currently a PhD candidate in electrical engineering, so my free time oscillates wildly depending on when I have conferences/reports/presentations. However, this project is something I definitely think is worth the time put into it. I will try to contribute as much as I can.
1. Ahh, got it, I mistook who "their" was referring to. 2. I saw in the FAQ that preference is typically given to the most recent writing by Tolkien, but I feel like many of his later ideas are fundamentally problematic. For example, the idea that the Earth was always round. I'm sure you guys have debated this, are you sticking with the idea of the Earth first being flat then being reshaped after the drowning of Numenor? Either way, Tulkas using fire is a pretty minor point; I'm fine with it. 3. Got it, I guess I misinterpreted the text. I like that idea a lot more. The concept that Varda was simply a transporter seriously diminishes her status. 4. Ahh, I see. Yes, then I agree with removing the references to the names originally. Random aside: I'm currently listening to the SilmFilm podcast by Corey Olsen (https://silmfilm.mythgard.org/). It's really interesting. |
09-26-2017, 01:48 PM | #10 |
King's Writer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,720
|
First of all welcome to this quite part of the Barrow-Downs gandalf85! The members of the project have always been thankful for any intrusion from outside, and as AcrusCalion has already mention additional opinions are very much needed at the time being. Feel yourself invited to post in any thread with the questions or suggestions that come to mind.
Since ArcusCalion answered most of your questions perfectly I only will add my to pence on Tulkas and the weilding of flame: I can understand your reservations. In the outline from Myths Transformed Tulkas is as well associated with the Sun being considered as the Valar of the Sun replacing Arien. But for me it makes perfect sense that Melkor in that war of the demiurgical powers is defeated especially in the field on which up to that point he only had specialised. Beside that Tulkas is descript as the 'good side of violence'. So we have to assume that in this war a lot of collateral damage occurred. About 2: Yes, that is what the project decided to do a long time ago: a realy falt earth until the drowning of Numenor at which point the earth was reshaped to be round. But none of us was around at that time. At that time only jallanite voted for a round earth version. I would have supported him, but when I joined the decision was long done and as today the choice in such fundamentel decisions is either to join and take these desisions as they are, or not to join. Two farther fundamental decision of this kind are: no frame story, that means all references to Eriol/Ælfwine have to be removed and no changes for reasons of 'style'. Respectfully Findegil Last edited by Findegil; 09-27-2017 at 09:42 PM. |
09-26-2017, 04:27 PM | #11 |
Wight
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 121
|
Thanks for the welcome Findegil! I personally would have voted for the flat Earth which was reshaped after Numenor was drowned. I just think it's a very unique and interesting part of the mythology. I know Tolkien's final words on the matter were that he preferred the Earth to always be round, but his primary issue seems to be that a flat Earth and the creation of the sun/moon is "astronomically absurd" based on our current understanding of science. However, I think the story of the creation of the sun and the moon is absolutely beautiful and it ties into one of the major themes in Tolkien's works. Even though the trees die and there is sadness, from this tragedy comes hope in the form of the sun and the moon. Also, the entire universe is absurd based on our understanding of science, so I don't buy into that argument. I can justify disagreeing with Tolkien because he spent his entire life working under the flat Earth principle and then it wasn't until very near the end of his life that he decided to change it, not because it makes the story more beautiful (in fact it does the opposite) but on a "scientific" basis.
The frame story is a more complicated question in my mind. I could probably be persuaded either way. Last edited by gandalf85; 09-26-2017 at 04:34 PM. Reason: not to double post |
|
|