Quote:
Originally Posted by A Little Green
It would be. More than the fact that you voted Kath, though, I'm unnerved by how you first urged the Pitchwaggon on and then washed your hands as soon as it actually began to happen. Maybe I've been fixated on that, but nothing has made me change my mind, either. These latter Days, then, I'm not sure what to make of the fact that each Day you seem to have someone you get into a heated argument with (whether it was you who started it or the other I don't know), and those tend to end up dead. It confuses me more than causes suspicion, though.
|
I meant to make a note of this but forgot. But you reminded me.
Oh, wait going back to the half-analysis of
Nerwen yesterday, I did. With the Pitch stuff, I think
Nerwen came more of as a standard
Lommy flip-flop and not trying to step away from it. There is a difference between what I would call a rambling
Lommy flip-flop and trying to wash your hands clean of it.
I mean, to me.
Nerwen saying:
Quote:
|
On the other hand, his cases on both of them were sound enough, by Day One standards– and someone had to get the ball rolling
|
Pointing out that suspicions had to start from someone and Pitch did in fact get them started. And..
Quote:
|
I was pointing out his perhaps opportunistic choice of targets– so yes, I suppose that's "casting suspicion". Is that a problem?
|
Here saying
Pitch did target 2 people (
Bom and
G55) who normally do look suspect early, and it's something that
Pitch would know.
I think it looks quite different than
Inzil who clearly did try to back away the next day from vote. Then at the same time also make sure to point out he started the
Pitch voting.