Quote:
Originally Posted by wilwarin538
It's Lottie's that bugs me. She had done this whole 'check' system, and ended up voting for someone that had no 'checks' for anything, rather than one of the people she had given 'wolf checks' for. Here's the post:
So there were 3 of us who had a 'check' for wolf, but when she voted none of us had votes so maybe she didn't want to throw away a vote. But she seemed to really think Fea could be the cobbler, though later said she'd almost definitely not vote for her. So why vote for someone who had no 'wolf' checks, over someone who had four 'cobbler' ones? At the time she voted, voting for Fea would not have been a throwaway. Oh, I know now you're saying 'but she sealed TEWs fate, she mustn't be a wolf', but when she voted Boro had basically said he'd be voting for TEW, and I had recently said I was planning to before I changed my mind. So it could still be a wolf on wolf.
I don't know, out of the 4 votes for him, this one is the fishiest.
|
I didn't vote
Fea for the same reason I didn't vote
Agan,
Boro, or
Wilwa - even though they all had "wolf" checks, they also had "innocent" checks. In short, they were being noticeable.
Now, something I noticed - if
TEWie thought he'd be lynched, he could well have voted his packmate to try and make whichever one survived look better. I'm not saying this makes
Fea a wolf; it's a random thought that popped into my head. Or he could have been trying to deflect attention away from a packmate who was on the chopping block; but again, this could well be a random, nonsensical thought.
As for
Boro, he's not acting like the
Boro-wolf I've played with, and I'm inclined to trust him.
Agan posts too many words, but she seems innocent, too.
EDIT: xed with Greenie