Reading and commenting at the same time...
Loslote, please, next time you interpret my posts in an obscure way, can you put the numbers of the posts there so that I can find them and explain? I'm very annoyed at my computer and a radio channel called Groove FM and the last thing I need is a wishy washy case on me which I can't even defend myself against because it is unclearly presented. /end rant
Ok sorry but that really irked me. Now off to actually reply the stuff which I feel I should reply to or where I feel you were misrepresenting me:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loslote
Post 19: Here she switches her positions entirely. Suddenly she's suspicious of Mac, but not of Nog or Mnemo. Where'd that come from?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by me
Mac is getting weird and jumpy. (Ha! Fourth jumpy wolf!) Nog, on the other hand, seems more reasonable.
Only the fact that Mnemo is gathering more and more suspicion is making me doubtful: like I've been telling people who never listen to me (:P), if someone who is not shouting a wolf is lynched with too much of a consensus s/he's probably an innocent.
|
=> representation doesn't really do justice to me.
Mac's and
Nog's behaviour changed a bit, so I notified it, but it doesn't mean I changed my mind about them. And I certainly was still suspicious of
Mnemo, just slightly worried because so many others were feeling (or "feeling") the same way.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Los
Post 31: Admits that Nienna was probably innocent after her death is assured; she seems to have gotten this from the fact that Nienna was, in fact, lynched? I'm not following that one..
|
"Admits"? Huh, that sounds quite bad. And I got that from
Shasta voting her; I just got this sudden feeling she must be innocent since
Shasta voted her. I'm not claiming that makes sense, I just got a feeling like that and posted it. And I do suspect
Shasta himself.
Err sorry
Loslote, don't take this personally, I mean not to bash you as a person, or diss your merits in this game (after you got us a wolf!) but I just feel you're misrepresenting me which does not make me exactly happy. I believe you're innocent* and thus not purposefully making a case that seems really silly (at least to me) but I just think you're not tight (obviously

) and grasping at straws.
*although there is the possibility that
Los and
Pitch are both wolves, but that would be really suicidial of them and easily found out, so it doesn't really make sense.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nogrod
Talking of Mr. Agreeable... there's quite little he suspected and thus there's probably quite little to read from his posts - which doesn't mean we should just not check his posting as well. We should actually read closely what he has said of other people. But I think it might be even more enlightening to see how others related to him - especially when there was something like a suspicion on him which then suddenly disappeared. So how did it actually fade? I remember myself suspecting him but soon realising basically no one suspected him anymore and then I decided to focus on others - but was it just his sweet-talking as Mr. Agreeable or were there anything outside of what he said himself that triggered the change?
|
If I have time, I will look at his and
Mnemo's interactions with people so that I may form a sort of consistent picture - that would be interesting. I myself dropped my suspicions of
Pitchwife after a few people had argued that his and
Mnemo's interactions seemed unfellowish and I took their arguments as plausible, especially as I had gradually felt les and less bad about
Pitchie. And once I had decided to consider him innocent for the time being, there was nothing that would've changed my mind...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shasta
"Nogrod has quite good points against Pitchie, but I still wonder about him too." Lommy, when you say "him", which "him" are you referring to? Pitch or Nog?
|
I was referring to
Nog. (That was like "
Nogrod has good points that make me suspect
Pitch, but I still suspect
Nogrod as well".)
It's a pity
Loslote gets only one dream, not only for the obvious reasons, but also because I was thinking it would've been a brilliant bluff if she'd been a secret normal seer and she would've claimed to be a secret limited seer. Oh well.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brinn
It was a mistake to lynch Nienna, she was the easy lynch, the most obvious suspect usually turns out innocent, blah, blah, blah.
|
I (obviously) agree it was a mistake, but really,
Sally was much more like "the obvious suspect" of the Day than her if you ask me. Speaking of which, I'm still quite torn about
Sally. She's weird.
Nogrod's replies to
Mac are weird, but then again,
Mac is weird himself. Gar. Actually, if I have time, I would like to have a look at those two. They're been playing nice quite easily and they give me bad vibes every now and then but then I forget about it always... I think they merit a closer look.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac
The reason for suspecting you (at least for me) is mostly your horrible voting record (yesterDay it was just sketchy, now it's pretty evil).
|
Yes, the voting record, and your general manner, popping in just for a while and using at least 50% of your energy to defending yourself. This Day has been much better, though; I liked your summary. But I still suspect you.
*needs to think about various stuff*