I have to go to class in about 10 minutes, so I'm voting now. And since no better candidates have come forward:
++Loslote
No, she has not been back to explain her vote, and she probably won't return toDay. But even if she does return, I have doubts there will be much explaining considering in the posts before her vote she kept saying she suspects
Lommy, but doesn't have a reason for it. She'd probably call it a gut feeling or something like that, but at this point we're beyond gut feelings and unreasoned suspicion. With eight pages of posts, surely everyone should have at least some reason to suspect somebody. With perhaps the exception of those majorly lacking in time. Which I don't think is the case with
Loslote, because then I don't think she would've even bothered to summarise
Lommy's post. I still don't understand why that summary is even there, if there is no conclusion made from it...or if there is, she's not sharing it which is silly since the conclusion is more important than the summary itself.
If I had time, I'd respond to
Sally's analysis of me since I find some points rather flawed, but unfortunately I really must go, so it'll have to wait until toMorrow. Btw dear, while
Sally can be rhymed with,
Stan is such a better name for rhyming. For example, if you were named
Stan, I could write a poem about
Stan and the
Saucepan Man. So there.
