Quote:
Originally Posted by Boromir88
Though, I still think the key is why Nerwen wasn't killed, and why you...would Izzy have gotten rid of someone who would likely vote against her, to keep you and Gwath, but also make her look more guilty by killing Nerwen? Or is Gwath hoping to use Nerwen's strong suspicion against Izzy, to vote for her, and put this game away?
|
I've been going over and over it in my head, and I just don't know. At first I was astonished that
Shasta got it, but now I can see reasons why
either of them might have killed him rather than me: a
Gwathwolf could be using my suspicion of
Izzy; an
Isawolfkya could have been afraid that killing me would point straight to her.
However– a
Gwathwolf shouldn't have had too much trouble getting someone other than himself lynched anyway.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nogrod
Now this is an interesting reaction to someone making plain pure sense and weighing the different possible scenarios... An innocent - even if one that would end up suspected by that kind of analysis - wouldn't react that way, I'd suppose. "Nice try"?  |
An innocent who wasn't
Izzy. Attacking anyone who looks at her sideways is actually one of her trademarks.
Really, though, if it were anyone else but
Izzy in the dock I wouldn't be hesitating... but this is a player with a history of acting in a
horribly suspicious way
as an innocent.
I think– note that I'm
only meaning this in the context of WW! – she has a genuine problem with understanding how she appears to others.
CF: her comments toDay:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Isabellkya
If you think I'm the "best choice" then show/prove it.
And no, I've haven't done anything in my power to look suspicious.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Isabellkya
I think "logically" it would be Gwath the mutineer and Nerwen the probable Cobbler; if you believe Greenie's claim.
If you were paranoid, and trying to delve into conspiracy-land Nerwen would be the Mutineer - and both Gwath and I as the innocents.
|
EDIT:X'd since Brinniel at 1276