"However, refusal to share thoughts isn't generally the greatest way to help innocents." ~
Shasta in #291.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shasta
Persons of Interest (re: possible fairytale characters gone wrong)
Aganzir: I think she's still mad at me for last game. Also, her comment about Lommy in her first post today rang a bell for me. It was a nice, shiny bell. A "For Whom The Bell Tolls" type bell.
Gwath: Given that I voted Boro yesterday to be consistent... no, you're not allowed to call me a hypocrite! That was yesterday! This is today! And I feel like he stole my reason from yesterday to hide that his vote is bandwagon-worthy.
Nerwen: I really, really, really think she's innocent. Obviously this means she is evil and should be lynched ASAP, according to my performance last game. Faulty wiring in the head, and mist in the crystal ball, I'm telling you.
Fea: She's under my radar. She's NEVER under my radar. What's going on?!
McCaber: Under my radar (as usual). I want to lynch him (as usual). However, I'm going to push past my prejudice (as usual) and vote someone else (as usual).
|
I don't see
Mith here.
#299 he votes and miscounts the vote tally. I suppose you wanted to keep your vote amongst those already voted for. But why not
Fea whom was on your "possible fairytale characters gone wrong" list? Or why not vote for someone you actually found suspicious?
As well given what you said to
Gaurcrist in #291. Where are your reasons for voting
Mith? You gave reasons why you
wouldn't vote for
Boro and
Eomer.
X'd since my last post.