Quote:
Originally Posted by Lomzy
I think it's either a scheme or a joke between friends and in both cases I advice to ignore it.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aganzy
Greenie - maybe you should calm down and ignore Boro and phantom?
|
First thing - I don't think I was in a state that would have required calming down. Second thing - although only concentrating on those two is surely dangerous, I can't ignore two players completely, either. That seems very unwise. You wouldn't advice me to ignore
Gwath, or
Kath (I'm a poet! Hooray!), or
Mith. I won't purposefully ignore anyone or anything. I don't see the point in that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Qwath (love that name!), underlining mine
Surely, Boro, you could "test" the village without risking the life of one of our better players?
|
Dunno why but calling scheming, complicated, attention-seeking players our better players annoys me.

No, but honestly, I don't think making things complicated and doing all sorts of ploys necessarily means being right more often or being more efficient in catching wolves.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boro
By the way, you can't trust someone's promises, but you can trust votes...and see I already voted so you are already safe from me.
|
Sorry but I don't buy this. As if you didn't know or expected that whoever it was who you said this to didn't know that the votes are retractable. Smells of a purposeful attempt to mislead another player.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aganzy
McC (although if he's planning to be quiet himself while saying the silent ones should be lynched first, I'm going to vote for him)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aganzy
Grr are you really going to lynch him on day 1 just because he's Boro?
|
So you'd be ready to lynch
McCaber just because he plays like he always does but are angry when people are about to lynch
Boro for being
Boro?