In a way I don't know what to make of
Mac's '
Rikae told me...' things. If he's a wolf, it wouldn't be very nice to use reasons like that.
He suspected
Menel for being too careful based on the three two-liners he had posted. I didn't find
Menel suspicious then nor did I now that I read through his posts so I don't really see where
Mac's coming from. Besides
Menel is a rather easy day 1 target.
He found everyone more or less innocent (or unknown) but
Brinn and me who
Rikae warned him about, and
Menel. I don't like his
Menel suspicion very much. It looks like it was enough for him to came up with someone he could vote before leaving without any actual reasons.
In the post where he said he has to vote soon he also said this:
Quote:
Would anyone please act very, very suspicious within the next half hour?
|
It trips my radar. It looks like what a wolf could say as they know most people (excluding the cobbler whom they don't want to kill) are innocent yet need to come up with proper suspicions. Saying that doesn't make
Mac a wolf but it's scary nonetheless.
When
tgwbs agreed with
Mac about
Menel being too careful but accused
Mac of carefulness & not explaining his thought process at the same time, he replied:
Quote:
What thought process?
|
I don't think I would have been suspicious of this otherwise but
Boro accused me the same a while ago because
Macwolf had done it. However I think our cases were different - I denied having a case against someone as I had merely been bringing up points against them while commenting on the day's happenings (plus there was a whole lot of misunderstanding concerning which post was talked about), but here
Mac denies having any thought process as for why
Menel seemed careful. Yes it's sometimes hard to elaborate, especially if it's a gut feeling, but he could at least have tried instead of downplaying suspicions like that.
He voted
Menel with the resolution he had shown since the beginning. It looks like he had just in the beginning decided to chase
Menel because he was easy enough.
Quote:
Yeesh... once I have to vote early and believe that you auditioners are smart enough to not do something terribly foolish, and then that.
*shakes head*
|
Okay then there's this. He explained it was a half-joke already but still I don't like it, just because I can remember a couple of
Macwolves having the same I-told-you attitude.
He apologized
Menel, saying he sounded very innocent later with his responses to
Mac's vote. For the reference, here are all
Menel's posts after
Mac's vote:
170,
177,
187,
203. What exactly made him sound more innocent there?
Mac asked
Boro why he thought his vote for
Menel was an easy way to slide by the day. At least I had no problems realising what
Boro meant.
He analysed day 1's votes. I won't bother quoting the whole thing here but if someone wants to see it, here's a
link. I disagree on
sally's retraction being somehow innocent-looking. Also a baddie would do it to avoid suspicion.
I don't understand this:
Quote:
Aganzir's vote for Nogrod is consequent - she suspected him for a long time. Not suspicious, unless her suspicions before were fabricated.
|
Just what's the point in saying the part after the comma? I think it should be self-evident anyway, and besides he couldn't know if my suspicions were fabricated until either I was dead or my role revealed by the seer so I can see no reason why he said it unless to keep some random suspicion on me.
When I said I was growing suspicious of him because of those comments, he replied vaguely:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac
But Aganzir, we've been wolves together once: you know that, when evil, I give every effort to appear the exact same way I do when innocent...
|
This doesn't actually even answer to the thing I said, ie that he reminded me of a wolfish
Mac. He just circumvents the question by saying that as a wolf he tries to be just like when innocent. So what? Maybe it's just bad luck on my part but I can't remember any innocent
Mac saying the things that first set off my alarm.
He didn't suspect me despite me bringing up points against him. Okay my points weren't very big but still. I don't know if he just found me innocent or if he wanted to avoid attention (not that he'd be afraid of me but negative attention is negative attention and can work as a foundation for larger suspicion). I can remember an innocent
Mac retaliating to my suspicions, but I also remember an innocent
Mac finding the ever-suspicious me innocent.
On day 2 she found
Fea's vote suspicious bet decided to let her be because he thought
phantom would figure her out sooner or later. He also found
Brinn's vote suspicious and said he was a bit suspicious of
tgwbs earlier but his posts since had looked innocent.
He thought
Boro was innocentish and commented on his vote for
Mac by 'Fair reasoning, fair placement.'
His main suspect was
Gwath. After having a look at him he concluded that he has posted very little of substance and wondered if a critic tried to appear more helpful. He found
Gwath's vote careless because of getting the bandwagon rolling. Mind you,
Gwath had two suspects, and I think he had more of a reason to suspect
Nog than
Lari. Should he have voted her then, or come up with someone completely different? And what does it matter if he gets the bandwagon rolling? At least someone he suspected got lynched, and I'm rather certain
Nog would've been lynched even if it wasn't for
Gwath's vote.
Mac is right, though, that
Gwath didn't post about anyone else but those two. Nonetheless,
Gwath as well as
Menel are always rather easy to suspect, and I can't say I particularly like
Mac gunning for those.
Of
Ilya (whom he later ended up voting) he had nothing to say except that she had too many quotes. He also found her vote a throwaway. As the day went on
Ilya started having some suspicions against
Mac on grounds that weren't the best I've seen, which partly explains his later decision to vote her.
As for
Mac's vote analysis, I think somebody also mentioned it but he didn't analyse those people who retracted to save
Nog until later.
Nog's innocence doesn't make those people innocent and I can see no reason to exclude the saving attempt from the analysis.
Also, why did my vote placement look evil? Because I voted after other people had said they didn't want
Nog lynched?
Later on day 2 his main suspects were
Fea and
Gwath and he was also suspicious of
Ilya and
Brinn. If you don't count the throwaway vote thing, he didn't give proper reasons for suspecting
Ilya until later.
I think we must wait till
Fea's role is revealed to get a clear image of his suspicion. Wolf-on-wolf (or wolf-on-cobbler) is a possibility, especially if they had a reason to assume
Fea had been dreamed of. I would imagine a cobbler
Fea to be rather good at making her identity known to the wolves and a wolfish
Mac to be quite good at catching the hints, and in that light his
Fea suspicion could be an honest one. More on that after
Fea's death.
Some twenty minutes before deadline
Mac posted a small case against
Ilya. I could agree with it but there were some things I don't really like. He found her
not too convincing defence of
Gwath suspicious because he was also suspicious of
Gwath.
Here's
Ilya's defence he was referring to. Of course I now have the benefit of knowing
Ilya was innocent, but I don't think her comment was suspicious.
What kind of connection did you see between
Ilya and
Brinn,
Mac?
He voted
Ilya on day 2, saying he could sense a last-minute bandwagon against him. I'm not going back to check every post from day 2 but as far as I'm aware only
Ilya and me considered voting him seriously. Wolves usually tend to overestimate the amount of suspicion against them and that comment doesn't feel very good.
After some day 1 suspicion against
Mac,
tgwbs moved him gradually towards his innocent category which could speak in favour of
Mac. However he was still listed as somewhat suspicious at the beginning of the day although not very close to the most suspicious end. In an earlier post
tgwbs had said he didn't find
Mac especially suspicious.
Dreaming of an innocent
Mac might explain
tgwbs's suspicion against me. On day 1 he called my points against
Mac good whereas on day 2 he didn't like my suspicions against him anymore. There are many other dream candidates, though, but his opinion makes me feel a bit more uncertain about
Mac.
In his analysis of
tgwbs's posts,
Mac reached the conclusion that he had probably dreamed of
Fea and me and found us both baddies. Of course I am biased when talking about this as I am pretty certain of my own innocence, but I think he seems to be a bit too quick to jump to conclusions, being even ready to suggest a double lynch.
Quote:
However, he definitely dreamt of Fea. Anything else is inconceivable. It is also quite inconceivable that tgwbs wrote one known-to-him baddie on the same line with an only suspected baddie. Therefore:
Night 1: Fea
Night 2: Aganzir
|
And by the way, there's still a chance he didn't dream of
Fea but was just suspicious of her for other reasons (and was probably right). I don't know how likely that is but there is no way he could say for certain that I'm a baddie, and his putting me together with
Fea makes me think he didn't dream of her either. Just because I don't think either that any seer would ever say a dreamed of baddie and someone not dreamed of are equally suspicious. You can call this a poor try if you wish but you shall see, you shall see.
Mac has been pursuing the
Fea-and-
Agan-are-guilty thing the whole day. He said if
Fea and I are fellows I let go of
Fea to save myself. Not exactly true because I found her suspicious already yesterday (to which
Mac answers by saying it could be wolf-on-wolf). Also, he didn't believe me when I told I hadn't really comprehended
tgwbs seemed to suspect me and the likely dreamed of baddie
Fea just as much, and said omitting it from my post & pretending
tgwbs didn't think so & hoping no one else would notice it was what he'd do as a wolf. Well, I was telling the truth. I'm not perfect believe it or not.
Mac accused
Boro of being either malevolent or blinded by
tgwbs's headache-talk for suggesting his first dream might not have been a wolf. I think he's overreacting. It's a bit dangerous to be so sure he's right. He wants to get
Fea and me lynched and is rather persuasive about it - I think he looks too certain to be innocent. And if
Fea is the cobbler she's done her duty or is needed no more & can be sacrificed since the critics already killed the seer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mac to Fea
Given the evidence against you, a genuine statement of innocence and surprise would probably have been the only thing that could have saved you. Now only a miracle could. 
|
Does that apply to me as well? I can tell you why I didn't make a genuine statement of innocence & surprise after
tgwbs's death - it never occurred to me that he could have dreamed of me since he was suspicious of me. You're accusing
Fea of that but
what if she's innocent and thought the same as I did? And regardless of
Fea's role I don't like that accusation. If she had actually done it you'd be saying now, 'She's
Fea, she can easily pull that off. I would be much more willing to believe her if she wasn't trying to convince us about her innocence now.'
If there was any doubt about
Fea being tgwbs's dream,
Mac countered it eg by asking how the seer could have made it clearer that he wanted
Fea lynched. His certainty about
Fea's guilt added to his willingness to double lynch don't look very good on him. It looks as if he actually
knows Fea is a baddie and wants the result of the lynch to not be too bad for his team. There are after all rather high chances that the other lynchee would be innocent.
He tries to justify it by saying that if
Fea is the cobbler, lynching her is just what she wants us to do. But when has
Fea actually been declared the cobbler? Yes she could be, but she could also be a critic. Or innocent.
In
Mac's opinion I would be a good double lynch candidate along with
Fea, but he's also willing to listen if someone comes up with someone better. So it's practically all the same to him who we lynch as long as it is a double lynch? If he really thought tgwbs had dreamed of me & found me guilty, wouldn't he be much more enthusiastic about getting me lynched? Yes I know it would be difficult to organize a double lynch but still. Or is he just wavering because he knows I'm innocent?
All in all I'm feeling quite bad about
Mac.
I have a feeling I'm getting flu & I'm quite tired so I'm going to sleep.
I hope
Mac appreciates this because it took me ages to finish.