If no one minds that I interject here again...
Quote:
|
I still have a hard time believing that. Only a young newbie wolf would use his additional information that carelessly.~Mac
|
Whether you think it's careless, or not, is irrelevant; you are attaching your emotions/opinions to the evidence. Since only a newbie wolf would be that careless, and
McCaber is not new to this, thus
McCaber is not a wolf.
That logic doesn't hold; if I said only a stupid dog would fall down the steps, and my dog is not stupid, therefor he would never fall down the steps. That statement would false, because my dog has fallen down the steps.
Just look at the evidence for what it is, no attached feelings or opinions, just look at it.
McCaber's had a squeaky clean voting record and has been right about everyone he's mentioned (until I pointed this out yesterday when I became the cobbler).
Would a careless wolf do that? I don't know would you consider me a careless wolf? Because it's more just an unconscious reaction than anything else, you can't just have this "turn off" switch that you have special information because you're a wolf. You have to constantly watch what you say and remind yourself "I don't know for certain." Also, it's a rather uncareless strategy in the regards of how long would it have gone unnoticed? I had no desire to look into
McCaber deeper until he tried to convince us he could be written off as a proven innocent. How many of the 5 suspicious people that
McCaber said should we have no difficulty in lynching/exonerating would have of turned up innocent before somebody did notice
McCaber's tidy record? How careless is it, when it's hard as hell to convince you this is not "weak" and "careless?"