Quote:
Originally Posted by tumhalad2
The problem is that they would argue that Tolkien is doing exaclty the same thing, equating evil with technological progress and good with the simple, hobbitic lifestyle.
|
I guess I didn't make myself clear: what I was trying to say is that as well as being simplistic in itself, this model does not represent reality in that the world is
not just divided into two camps of "the old" vs "the new".
For example– very many people who consider themselves left-wing and therefore socially progressive are
highly suspicious of technology, medicine and science in general. Where do they fit? (Note that Tolkien has always been beloved of hippies.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tumhalad2
This of coarse is in fact an assumption on there part-they assume Tolkien is making some sort of social statement. However, it may not even be this concious...they would and do say that regardless of Tolkien's intentions the work is inherently infused with these "conservative" "bad" "backward" ideas, that yes they equate at least with antiprogress and badness.
Therefore, they (Im using 'they' a lot) say that Tolkien's book, regardless of his intent, is inherently backward, conservative, and that anyone who thinks otherwise is a 'retard'(to quote the star wars board)!!
This subtle argument is the most difficult to tackle.
|
Not really. What they seem to be saying is that no work which does not actively promote their own particular views can be taken seriously.
Frankly, I think that's a pathetic attitude– and I
am a humanist!