... and still continuing.
Volo: Now here's a tough one! Very hard to get a reading. My family has played with his family twice. On the first time my grandpa' was a lycantrophe and would have liked to make a billion cases against him but as he was a major asset for my grandpa' he left him be and was finally "betrayed" by him and died to the benefit of the village... Last time my father found a hint clear enough to go for lynching his father and that one actually was a wolf. But as I believe people get smarter by every generation, I'm not sure if this one of the line of his family is as easy to pick up as his father was.
He goes after
Mac in his first post (#23):
Quote:
|
May I ask how did you manage to cross-post with Lommy? It does seem somewhat thingy to say so much so early, like we have seen before . But then again, he didn't actually say much thingy stuff, seems pretty honest to me, even if too much.
|
without actually saying anything. But excusing his own possible early vote.
On #29 he still keeps going after
Mac with not the best of reasons:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mac
True. But there are always 'alpha innocents', who are knowledgable, helpful and indispensible. Lynching those is the joy of the things at night.
|
"Hmm... I don't really agree with you. They can be really misleading. But I hope you don't suggest being one yourself yet? Anyway I somehow don't like the tone of your talk."
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mac
Not always. The waggoneers will usually be closely examined the next day.
|
"Wasn't that already said?"
|
Also his vote was somewhat dubious, or what do you say:
Quote:
Ok, this might be nearly as random as Gil's vote, but here it goes.
++Macalaure, too much explaining talk. Just like Boromir last game. I hope I don't make a big mistake here as Mac really is a usefull guy if innocent.
|
So just giving the air of making a "random" vote, but still he had already coherently suspected
Mac with his earlier posts, as you can see. It should be noted that he defended Lommy consistently too.
All this might be looked as thingy behaviour or just a still newcomer trying to find a style of play... Not good, I say, but not the most suspicious either, or then is. I must see the rest before making any judgements about people...
PS.
Volo: you have one retraction possibility! So your vote is not final! Think about it!