Quote:
|
=Sleepy Ranger: Its 7pm GMT.
|
Thanks. Clear now.
Quote:
=THE Ka: Though, I am a bit at lost at what to be. Last time I was an Empirical Philosopher, and that worked beautifully. Hmmm... Well, since I'm sort of a Thomas More at times (you can't catch me Henry if I don't say anything! ) I think I will be a laywer. But... then again, I can mix it with Psychologist and be extremely happy.
There. That's what I'll do.
Moreish Pavlovian Psychologist
|
But is there really any difference between, say John Locke or La Mettrie, and a pavlovian psychologist? So not really altering your role anyways?
Which brought me a thought of being myself a post-structuralist musician, having a maxim of "there's nothing behind the score, just notes being notes" - and you can think how that sounds!
